结直肠癌术后监测的挑战:一个关键的评估和前进的道路。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Arunkumar Krishnan, Diptasree Mukherjee
{"title":"结直肠癌术后监测的挑战:一个关键的评估和前进的道路。","authors":"Arunkumar Krishnan, Diptasree Mukherjee","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.106965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A recent study by Sala-Miquel <i>et al</i> investigated the diagnostic effectiveness of follow-up strategies in patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) after surgical resection. This research highlighted the significance of using computed tomography (CT), colonoscopy, and tumor markers for the early detection of recurrence or metastasis. The findings indicated that strict adherence to follow-up protocols can contribute to decreased mortality rates among these patients. However, the study has several limitations that must be considered. It was retrospective and conducted at a single center, which may affect the generalizability of the results. Further, the absence of a control group and the exclusion of stage IV patients limit the study's applicability. Methodological issues, including insufficient adjustment for confounding variables, a lack of sensitivity analyses, and limitations in time-dependent covariate analysis, further constrain the conclusions' robustness. Moreover, while the study emphasizes the role of CT scans, it does not adequately address their potential risks and underrepresents the importance of colonoscopy. Future research should focus on multicenter, prospective studies that integrate personalized follow-up approaches and explore innovative technologies to enhance the efficacy of follow-up strategies in CRC management. By addressing these limitations, researchers can improve the applicability and impact of follow-up strategies in the care of CRC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"17 6","pages":"106965"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188550/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges in colorectal cancer post-surgical surveillance: A critical evaluation and path forward.\",\"authors\":\"Arunkumar Krishnan, Diptasree Mukherjee\",\"doi\":\"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.106965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A recent study by Sala-Miquel <i>et al</i> investigated the diagnostic effectiveness of follow-up strategies in patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) after surgical resection. This research highlighted the significance of using computed tomography (CT), colonoscopy, and tumor markers for the early detection of recurrence or metastasis. The findings indicated that strict adherence to follow-up protocols can contribute to decreased mortality rates among these patients. However, the study has several limitations that must be considered. It was retrospective and conducted at a single center, which may affect the generalizability of the results. Further, the absence of a control group and the exclusion of stage IV patients limit the study's applicability. Methodological issues, including insufficient adjustment for confounding variables, a lack of sensitivity analyses, and limitations in time-dependent covariate analysis, further constrain the conclusions' robustness. Moreover, while the study emphasizes the role of CT scans, it does not adequately address their potential risks and underrepresents the importance of colonoscopy. Future research should focus on multicenter, prospective studies that integrate personalized follow-up approaches and explore innovative technologies to enhance the efficacy of follow-up strategies in CRC management. By addressing these limitations, researchers can improve the applicability and impact of follow-up strategies in the care of CRC patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"volume\":\"17 6\",\"pages\":\"106965\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188550/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.106965\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.106965","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Sala-Miquel等人最近的一项研究调查了手术切除后非转移性结直肠癌(CRC)患者随访策略的诊断有效性。本研究强调了使用计算机断层扫描(CT)、结肠镜检查和肿瘤标志物对早期发现复发或转移的重要性。研究结果表明,严格遵守随访协议有助于降低这些患者的死亡率。然而,这项研究有一些必须考虑的局限性。它是回顾性的,在单一中心进行,这可能会影响结果的普遍性。此外,缺乏对照组和排除IV期患者限制了研究的适用性。方法学问题,包括对混杂变量调整不足、缺乏敏感性分析和时间相关协变量分析的局限性,进一步限制了结论的稳健性。此外,虽然该研究强调了CT扫描的作用,但它没有充分说明其潜在风险,也没有充分说明结肠镜检查的重要性。未来的研究应侧重于多中心前瞻性研究,整合个性化随访方法,探索创新技术,以提高随访策略在结直肠癌管理中的有效性。通过解决这些局限性,研究人员可以提高随访策略在CRC患者护理中的适用性和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Challenges in colorectal cancer post-surgical surveillance: A critical evaluation and path forward.

A recent study by Sala-Miquel et al investigated the diagnostic effectiveness of follow-up strategies in patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) after surgical resection. This research highlighted the significance of using computed tomography (CT), colonoscopy, and tumor markers for the early detection of recurrence or metastasis. The findings indicated that strict adherence to follow-up protocols can contribute to decreased mortality rates among these patients. However, the study has several limitations that must be considered. It was retrospective and conducted at a single center, which may affect the generalizability of the results. Further, the absence of a control group and the exclusion of stage IV patients limit the study's applicability. Methodological issues, including insufficient adjustment for confounding variables, a lack of sensitivity analyses, and limitations in time-dependent covariate analysis, further constrain the conclusions' robustness. Moreover, while the study emphasizes the role of CT scans, it does not adequately address their potential risks and underrepresents the importance of colonoscopy. Future research should focus on multicenter, prospective studies that integrate personalized follow-up approaches and explore innovative technologies to enhance the efficacy of follow-up strategies in CRC management. By addressing these limitations, researchers can improve the applicability and impact of follow-up strategies in the care of CRC patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信