颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术的术后物理治疗应用:美国实践模式分析。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005442
Justin M Lantz, William J Karakash, Andy T Ton, Andreas Remis, Henry Avetisian, David B Anderson, Yogi Matharu, Ram K Alluri, Zorica Buser
{"title":"颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术的术后物理治疗应用:美国实践模式分析。","authors":"Justin M Lantz, William J Karakash, Andy T Ton, Andreas Remis, Henry Avetisian, David B Anderson, Yogi Matharu, Ram K Alluri, Zorica Buser","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>Retrospective Cohort Study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe postoperative physical therapy (PostopPT) utilization patterns and evaluate predictors of utilization after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).</p><p><strong>Background context: </strong>ACDF is the most common cervical spine procedure. PostopPT may improve outcomes, but current usage and program characteristics are unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PearlDiver Database identified patients who underwent ACDF between 2010-April 2023. PostopPT utilization was assessed 7-365 days postoperatively. Demographics, comorbidities, and procedural characteristics were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression identified predictors of PostopPT utilization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 309,230 ACDF patients, 17.16% utilized PostopPT within one year. Among users, the average number of visits was 7.4, with mean initiation at 88 days (median: 61 d). PostopPT users were younger, had higher comorbidity burden, higher income, were more often female, and more likely to present with combined radiculopathy and myelopathy (P<0.001).Demographic predictors included commercial insurance (OR: 1.37), residence in the Northeast (OR: 1.35) or Midwest (OR: 1.31), income >$75,000 (OR: 1.17), female gender (OR: 1.14), and age <50 (OR: 1.10) (all P<0.001). Comorbidity predictors included fibromyalgia (OR: 1.37), osteoarthritis (OR: 1.30), obesity (OR: 1.29), depression (OR: 1.26), osteoporosis (OR: 1.19), ECI ≥4 (OR: 1.13), diabetes (OR: 1.08), and tobacco use (OR: 1.07) (all P<0.001). Procedural predictors included mixed myelopathy/radiculopathy (OR: 1.29), fusion ≥3 levels (OR: 1.22), orthopedic surgeon as provider (OR: 1.10), inpatient surgery (OR: 1.09), and two-level fusion (OR: 1.08) (all P<0.001).Patients with myelopathy alone were more likely to receive gait training, aquatic therapy, and group training, but less likely to receive manual therapy, electrical stimulation, hot/cold therapy, or ultrasound (all P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PostopPT usage following ACDF is limited. Distinct demographic, comorbidity, and procedural factors predicted usage. PostopPT programs varied in timing, frequency, and intervention type.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative Physical Therapy Utilization for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: An Analysis of Practice Patterns in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Justin M Lantz, William J Karakash, Andy T Ton, Andreas Remis, Henry Avetisian, David B Anderson, Yogi Matharu, Ram K Alluri, Zorica Buser\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>Retrospective Cohort Study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe postoperative physical therapy (PostopPT) utilization patterns and evaluate predictors of utilization after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).</p><p><strong>Background context: </strong>ACDF is the most common cervical spine procedure. PostopPT may improve outcomes, but current usage and program characteristics are unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PearlDiver Database identified patients who underwent ACDF between 2010-April 2023. PostopPT utilization was assessed 7-365 days postoperatively. Demographics, comorbidities, and procedural characteristics were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression identified predictors of PostopPT utilization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 309,230 ACDF patients, 17.16% utilized PostopPT within one year. Among users, the average number of visits was 7.4, with mean initiation at 88 days (median: 61 d). PostopPT users were younger, had higher comorbidity burden, higher income, were more often female, and more likely to present with combined radiculopathy and myelopathy (P<0.001).Demographic predictors included commercial insurance (OR: 1.37), residence in the Northeast (OR: 1.35) or Midwest (OR: 1.31), income >$75,000 (OR: 1.17), female gender (OR: 1.14), and age <50 (OR: 1.10) (all P<0.001). Comorbidity predictors included fibromyalgia (OR: 1.37), osteoarthritis (OR: 1.30), obesity (OR: 1.29), depression (OR: 1.26), osteoporosis (OR: 1.19), ECI ≥4 (OR: 1.13), diabetes (OR: 1.08), and tobacco use (OR: 1.07) (all P<0.001). Procedural predictors included mixed myelopathy/radiculopathy (OR: 1.29), fusion ≥3 levels (OR: 1.22), orthopedic surgeon as provider (OR: 1.10), inpatient surgery (OR: 1.09), and two-level fusion (OR: 1.08) (all P<0.001).Patients with myelopathy alone were more likely to receive gait training, aquatic therapy, and group training, but less likely to receive manual therapy, electrical stimulation, hot/cold therapy, or ultrasound (all P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PostopPT usage following ACDF is limited. Distinct demographic, comorbidity, and procedural factors predicted usage. PostopPT programs varied in timing, frequency, and intervention type.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005442\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005442","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计/设置:回顾性队列研究。目的:描述颈椎前路椎间盘切除术融合(ACDF)术后物理治疗(PostopPT)的应用模式,并评估其应用的预测因素。背景:ACDF是最常见的颈椎手术。poststoppt可能改善预后,但目前的使用情况和程序特点尚不清楚。方法:PearlDiver数据库选取2010年至2023年4月间行ACDF的患者。术后7-365天评估术后利用率。分析了人口统计学、合并症和手术特征。单因素和多因素logistic回归确定了术后使用的预测因素。结果:在309230例ACDF患者中,17.16%的患者在一年内使用了poststoppt。在用户中,平均访问次数为7.4次,平均起始时间为88天(中位数:61天)。术后停药使用者年龄较小,合并症负担较高,收入较高,多为女性,更有可能出现神经根病和脊髓病合并(P$75,000 (OR: 1.17),女性(OR: 1.14)和年龄)。结论:ACDF后术后停药使用有限。不同的人口统计学,合并症和程序因素预测使用。术后治疗方案在时间、频率和干预类型上各不相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Postoperative Physical Therapy Utilization for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: An Analysis of Practice Patterns in the United States.

Study design/setting: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Objective: To describe postoperative physical therapy (PostopPT) utilization patterns and evaluate predictors of utilization after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

Background context: ACDF is the most common cervical spine procedure. PostopPT may improve outcomes, but current usage and program characteristics are unknown.

Methods: PearlDiver Database identified patients who underwent ACDF between 2010-April 2023. PostopPT utilization was assessed 7-365 days postoperatively. Demographics, comorbidities, and procedural characteristics were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression identified predictors of PostopPT utilization.

Results: Of 309,230 ACDF patients, 17.16% utilized PostopPT within one year. Among users, the average number of visits was 7.4, with mean initiation at 88 days (median: 61 d). PostopPT users were younger, had higher comorbidity burden, higher income, were more often female, and more likely to present with combined radiculopathy and myelopathy (P<0.001).Demographic predictors included commercial insurance (OR: 1.37), residence in the Northeast (OR: 1.35) or Midwest (OR: 1.31), income >$75,000 (OR: 1.17), female gender (OR: 1.14), and age <50 (OR: 1.10) (all P<0.001). Comorbidity predictors included fibromyalgia (OR: 1.37), osteoarthritis (OR: 1.30), obesity (OR: 1.29), depression (OR: 1.26), osteoporosis (OR: 1.19), ECI ≥4 (OR: 1.13), diabetes (OR: 1.08), and tobacco use (OR: 1.07) (all P<0.001). Procedural predictors included mixed myelopathy/radiculopathy (OR: 1.29), fusion ≥3 levels (OR: 1.22), orthopedic surgeon as provider (OR: 1.10), inpatient surgery (OR: 1.09), and two-level fusion (OR: 1.08) (all P<0.001).Patients with myelopathy alone were more likely to receive gait training, aquatic therapy, and group training, but less likely to receive manual therapy, electrical stimulation, hot/cold therapy, or ultrasound (all P<0.001).

Conclusions: PostopPT usage following ACDF is limited. Distinct demographic, comorbidity, and procedural factors predicted usage. PostopPT programs varied in timing, frequency, and intervention type.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信