印度抗菌剂管理和手术部位感染监测的差距和机会。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Abhinay Tumati, Harjot K Singh, Divya Kewalramani, Manjari Joshi, Philip S Barie, Mayur Narayan
{"title":"印度抗菌剂管理和手术部位感染监测的差距和机会。","authors":"Abhinay Tumati, Harjot K Singh, Divya Kewalramani, Manjari Joshi, Philip S Barie, Mayur Narayan","doi":"10.1089/sur.2025.043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Surgical site infections (SSIs) constitute major yet preventable complications. Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are evidence-based interventions recommended to reduce SSI incidence, yet their implementation and impact in India remain poorly characterized. This study aimed to assess current ASP implementation and SSI surveillance practices in Indian hospitals to identify gaps and inform future interventions. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A prospective cross-sectional survey of five geographically diverse Indian academic medical centers was conducted between 2017 and 2021, assessing existing ASPs, surgical volume, SSI incidence and surveillance protocols, prevalence of multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDRO), and microbiology laboratory capability. Data were collected using REDCap® and analyzed for inter-center variations. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Three of five (60%) centers completed the survey. All reported SSI surveillance, with heterogenous monitoring frequency (i.e., daily to monthly). Two had formal patient safety and infection prevention committees; none had an ASP committee. Only one provided formalized education on pre-operative patient preparation or ASP principles. All had an accessible microbiology laboratory, but only one had pharmacy informatics to track antimicrobial agent utilization. Across hospitals, the mean (range) MDRO prevalence was as follows: methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> 3.9% (1.5%-11.5%); extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producers 32.7% (15.1%-57.4%); and carbapenem-resistance 16.0% (3.7%-30.0%). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> ASP implementation and SSI surveillance practices vary widely across Indian academic hospitals, with key gaps in committee oversight, clinician education, informatics infrastructure, and subspeciality-based data. High MDRO rates highlight the urgent need for standardized, scalable stewardship frameworks tailored to the Indian healthcare context. Multiple opportunities exist to address these gaps and combat antimicrobial agent resistance at a national level, but a lack of infrastructure poses barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":22109,"journal":{"name":"Surgical infections","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gaps and Opportunities in Antimicrobial Stewardship and Surgical Site Infection Surveillance Across India.\",\"authors\":\"Abhinay Tumati, Harjot K Singh, Divya Kewalramani, Manjari Joshi, Philip S Barie, Mayur Narayan\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/sur.2025.043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Surgical site infections (SSIs) constitute major yet preventable complications. Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are evidence-based interventions recommended to reduce SSI incidence, yet their implementation and impact in India remain poorly characterized. This study aimed to assess current ASP implementation and SSI surveillance practices in Indian hospitals to identify gaps and inform future interventions. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A prospective cross-sectional survey of five geographically diverse Indian academic medical centers was conducted between 2017 and 2021, assessing existing ASPs, surgical volume, SSI incidence and surveillance protocols, prevalence of multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDRO), and microbiology laboratory capability. Data were collected using REDCap® and analyzed for inter-center variations. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Three of five (60%) centers completed the survey. All reported SSI surveillance, with heterogenous monitoring frequency (i.e., daily to monthly). Two had formal patient safety and infection prevention committees; none had an ASP committee. Only one provided formalized education on pre-operative patient preparation or ASP principles. All had an accessible microbiology laboratory, but only one had pharmacy informatics to track antimicrobial agent utilization. Across hospitals, the mean (range) MDRO prevalence was as follows: methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> 3.9% (1.5%-11.5%); extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producers 32.7% (15.1%-57.4%); and carbapenem-resistance 16.0% (3.7%-30.0%). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> ASP implementation and SSI surveillance practices vary widely across Indian academic hospitals, with key gaps in committee oversight, clinician education, informatics infrastructure, and subspeciality-based data. High MDRO rates highlight the urgent need for standardized, scalable stewardship frameworks tailored to the Indian healthcare context. Multiple opportunities exist to address these gaps and combat antimicrobial agent resistance at a national level, but a lack of infrastructure poses barriers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical infections\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical infections\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2025.043\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical infections","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2025.043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:手术部位感染(ssi)是主要但可预防的并发症。抗菌剂管理计划(asp)是一种以证据为基础的干预措施,被推荐用于减少SSI发生率,但其在印度的实施和影响仍不清楚。本研究旨在评估印度医院目前ASP的实施情况和SSI监测做法,以确定差距并为未来的干预措施提供信息。方法:在2017年至2021年期间,对五个地理位置不同的印度学术医疗中心进行前瞻性横断面调查,评估现有的asp、手术量、SSI发生率和监测方案、多重耐药菌(MDRO)的患病率以及微生物学实验室能力。使用REDCap®收集数据并分析中心间差异。结果:五分之三(60%)的中心完成了调查。所有报告SSI监测,监测频率不均匀(即每日至每月)。两个国家有正式的患者安全和感染预防委员会;都没有ASP委员会。只有一家提供了术前患者准备或ASP原则的正规教育。所有医院都有可访问的微生物实验室,但只有一家医院有药学信息学来跟踪抗菌药物的使用情况。各医院MDRO平均(范围)患病率如下:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌3.9% (1.5% ~ 11.5%);广谱β -内酰胺酶产生菌占32.7% (15.1% ~ 57.4%);碳青霉烯耐药16.0%(3.7% ~ 30.0%)。结论:印度各医院的ASP实施和SSI监测实践差异很大,在委员会监督、临床医生教育、信息基础设施和基于亚专科的数据方面存在关键差距。高MDRO率突出表明迫切需要针对印度医疗保健环境量身定制的标准化、可扩展的管理框架。在国家一级解决这些差距和抗击抗微生物药物耐药性存在多种机会,但缺乏基础设施构成了障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gaps and Opportunities in Antimicrobial Stewardship and Surgical Site Infection Surveillance Across India.

Background: Surgical site infections (SSIs) constitute major yet preventable complications. Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are evidence-based interventions recommended to reduce SSI incidence, yet their implementation and impact in India remain poorly characterized. This study aimed to assess current ASP implementation and SSI surveillance practices in Indian hospitals to identify gaps and inform future interventions. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional survey of five geographically diverse Indian academic medical centers was conducted between 2017 and 2021, assessing existing ASPs, surgical volume, SSI incidence and surveillance protocols, prevalence of multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDRO), and microbiology laboratory capability. Data were collected using REDCap® and analyzed for inter-center variations. Results: Three of five (60%) centers completed the survey. All reported SSI surveillance, with heterogenous monitoring frequency (i.e., daily to monthly). Two had formal patient safety and infection prevention committees; none had an ASP committee. Only one provided formalized education on pre-operative patient preparation or ASP principles. All had an accessible microbiology laboratory, but only one had pharmacy informatics to track antimicrobial agent utilization. Across hospitals, the mean (range) MDRO prevalence was as follows: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus 3.9% (1.5%-11.5%); extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producers 32.7% (15.1%-57.4%); and carbapenem-resistance 16.0% (3.7%-30.0%). Conclusions: ASP implementation and SSI surveillance practices vary widely across Indian academic hospitals, with key gaps in committee oversight, clinician education, informatics infrastructure, and subspeciality-based data. High MDRO rates highlight the urgent need for standardized, scalable stewardship frameworks tailored to the Indian healthcare context. Multiple opportunities exist to address these gaps and combat antimicrobial agent resistance at a national level, but a lack of infrastructure poses barriers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgical infections
Surgical infections INFECTIOUS DISEASES-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Infections provides comprehensive and authoritative information on the biology, prevention, and management of post-operative infections. Original articles cover the latest advancements, new therapeutic management strategies, and translational research that is being applied to improve clinical outcomes and successfully treat post-operative infections. Surgical Infections coverage includes: -Peritonitis and intra-abdominal infections- Surgical site infections- Pneumonia and other nosocomial infections- Cellular and humoral immunity- Biology of the host response- Organ dysfunction syndromes- Antibiotic use- Resistant and opportunistic pathogens- Epidemiology and prevention- The operating room environment- Diagnostic studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信