更年期,月经周期和皮肤屏障功能。

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Đurđa Cvjetković Nikoletić, David Ivanov, Olivera Levakov, Jelena Bulajić, Sonja Lukač, Vedrana Karan Rakić, Milana Ivkov-Simić
{"title":"更年期,月经周期和皮肤屏障功能。","authors":"Đurđa Cvjetković Nikoletić, David Ivanov, Olivera Levakov, Jelena Bulajić, Sonja Lukač, Vedrana Karan Rakić, Milana Ivkov-Simić","doi":"10.1111/srt.70203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are a limited number of studies describing the impact of the menstrual cycle and postmenopause on the skin barrier function, and existing research data are conflicting. The aim of our research was to investigate the impact of the menstrual cycle and postmenopause on the epidermal barrier function and its main biophysical parameters-transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and skin hydration (SH).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eighty-one female participants were included in the study, aged 18-65 years, of which 36 in the reproductive period (average age 27.06 ± 5.60 years) and 45 in postmenopause (average age 56.56 ± 4.37 years). TEWL and SH were measured during the ovulatory and mid-luteal phases in participants in the reproductive period, and on two occasions, 7 days apart, in posmenopausal participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean TEWL value was significantly higher in the mid-luteal phase (TEWL 2; 9.92 ± 1.37) compared to the ovulatory phase (TEWL 1; 8.87 ± 1.59). However, no significant difference in TEWL was observed between the two groups of participants. The mean SH value was significantly higher in the ovulatory phase (SH 1; 40.55 ± 7.80) compared to the mid-luteal phase (SH 2; 36.27 ± 7.42). Moreover, SH in the ovulatory phase was significantly higher in comparison to the postmenopausal group (40.55:36.27; p = 0.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study indicates a more functional epidermal barrier during the ovulatory phase, as evidenced by higher TEWL values and lower SH values compared to the mid-luteal phase. However, the differences between the two participant groups remain intriguing, as no significant difference in TEWL was observed between them, despite significantly higher SH values in the ovulatory phase compared to the postmenopausal group.</p>","PeriodicalId":21746,"journal":{"name":"Skin Research and Technology","volume":"31 7","pages":"e70203"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12206585/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Menopause, Menstrual Cycle, and Skin Barrier Function.\",\"authors\":\"Đurđa Cvjetković Nikoletić, David Ivanov, Olivera Levakov, Jelena Bulajić, Sonja Lukač, Vedrana Karan Rakić, Milana Ivkov-Simić\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/srt.70203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are a limited number of studies describing the impact of the menstrual cycle and postmenopause on the skin barrier function, and existing research data are conflicting. The aim of our research was to investigate the impact of the menstrual cycle and postmenopause on the epidermal barrier function and its main biophysical parameters-transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and skin hydration (SH).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eighty-one female participants were included in the study, aged 18-65 years, of which 36 in the reproductive period (average age 27.06 ± 5.60 years) and 45 in postmenopause (average age 56.56 ± 4.37 years). TEWL and SH were measured during the ovulatory and mid-luteal phases in participants in the reproductive period, and on two occasions, 7 days apart, in posmenopausal participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean TEWL value was significantly higher in the mid-luteal phase (TEWL 2; 9.92 ± 1.37) compared to the ovulatory phase (TEWL 1; 8.87 ± 1.59). However, no significant difference in TEWL was observed between the two groups of participants. The mean SH value was significantly higher in the ovulatory phase (SH 1; 40.55 ± 7.80) compared to the mid-luteal phase (SH 2; 36.27 ± 7.42). Moreover, SH in the ovulatory phase was significantly higher in comparison to the postmenopausal group (40.55:36.27; p = 0.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study indicates a more functional epidermal barrier during the ovulatory phase, as evidenced by higher TEWL values and lower SH values compared to the mid-luteal phase. However, the differences between the two participant groups remain intriguing, as no significant difference in TEWL was observed between them, despite significantly higher SH values in the ovulatory phase compared to the postmenopausal group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Skin Research and Technology\",\"volume\":\"31 7\",\"pages\":\"e70203\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12206585/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Skin Research and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.70203\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skin Research and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.70203","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:描述月经周期和绝经后对皮肤屏障功能影响的研究数量有限,现有研究数据相互矛盾。我们的研究目的是探讨月经周期和绝经后对表皮屏障功能及其主要生物物理参数-经皮失水(TEWL)和皮肤水合(SH)的影响。材料与方法:纳入女性81例,年龄18 ~ 65岁,其中育龄期36例(平均年龄27.06±5.60岁),绝经后45例(平均年龄56.56±4.37岁)。在生殖期参与者的排卵期和黄体中期测量TEWL和SH,在绝经后参与者中测量两次,间隔7天。结果:黄体中期平均TEWL值显著增高(TEWL 2;(9.92±1.37),与排卵期(TEWL 1;8.87±1.59)。然而,TEWL在两组参与者之间没有显著差异。排卵期平均SH值显著升高(SH 1;40.55±7.80)与黄体中期(SH 2;36.27±7.42)。此外,排卵期的SH明显高于绝经后组(40.55:36.27;P = 0.009)。结论:我们的研究表明,与黄体中期相比,排卵期的表皮屏障功能更强,TEWL值更高,SH值更低。然而,两个参与者组之间的差异仍然很有趣,因为尽管排卵期的SH值明显高于绝经后组,但他们之间的TEWL没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Menopause, Menstrual Cycle, and Skin Barrier Function.

Background: There are a limited number of studies describing the impact of the menstrual cycle and postmenopause on the skin barrier function, and existing research data are conflicting. The aim of our research was to investigate the impact of the menstrual cycle and postmenopause on the epidermal barrier function and its main biophysical parameters-transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and skin hydration (SH).

Materials and methods: Eighty-one female participants were included in the study, aged 18-65 years, of which 36 in the reproductive period (average age 27.06 ± 5.60 years) and 45 in postmenopause (average age 56.56 ± 4.37 years). TEWL and SH were measured during the ovulatory and mid-luteal phases in participants in the reproductive period, and on two occasions, 7 days apart, in posmenopausal participants.

Results: The mean TEWL value was significantly higher in the mid-luteal phase (TEWL 2; 9.92 ± 1.37) compared to the ovulatory phase (TEWL 1; 8.87 ± 1.59). However, no significant difference in TEWL was observed between the two groups of participants. The mean SH value was significantly higher in the ovulatory phase (SH 1; 40.55 ± 7.80) compared to the mid-luteal phase (SH 2; 36.27 ± 7.42). Moreover, SH in the ovulatory phase was significantly higher in comparison to the postmenopausal group (40.55:36.27; p = 0.009).

Conclusion: Our study indicates a more functional epidermal barrier during the ovulatory phase, as evidenced by higher TEWL values and lower SH values compared to the mid-luteal phase. However, the differences between the two participant groups remain intriguing, as no significant difference in TEWL was observed between them, despite significantly higher SH values in the ovulatory phase compared to the postmenopausal group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Skin Research and Technology
Skin Research and Technology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
95
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Skin Research and Technology is a clinically-oriented journal on biophysical methods and imaging techniques and how they are used in dermatology, cosmetology and plastic surgery for noninvasive quantification of skin structure and functions. Papers are invited on the development and validation of methods and their application in the characterization of diseased, abnormal and normal skin. Topics include blood flow, colorimetry, thermography, evaporimetry, epidermal humidity, desquamation, profilometry, skin mechanics, epiluminiscence microscopy, high-frequency ultrasonography, confocal microscopy, digital imaging, image analysis and computerized evaluation and magnetic resonance. Noninvasive biochemical methods (such as lipids, keratin and tissue water) and the instrumental evaluation of cytological and histological samples are also covered. The journal has a wide scope and aims to link scientists, clinical researchers and technicians through original articles, communications, editorials and commentaries, letters, reviews, announcements and news. Contributions should be clear, experimentally sound and novel.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信