使用功能锻炼和纤维化间质性肺疾病患者报告的预后预测生存结局的风险模型:一项前瞻性观察研究

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Respirology Pub Date : 2025-06-30 DOI:10.1111/resp.70076
Lan-Yan Yang, Hsin-Ting Yang, Yi-Hsuan Yu, Pin-Kuei Fu
{"title":"使用功能锻炼和纤维化间质性肺疾病患者报告的预后预测生存结局的风险模型:一项前瞻性观察研究","authors":"Lan-Yan Yang, Hsin-Ting Yang, Yi-Hsuan Yu, Pin-Kuei Fu","doi":"10.1111/resp.70076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Fibrotic interstitial lung disease (F-ILD) has high mortality, necessitating multidimensional staging to assess severity, predict prognosis, and guide treatment. However, the gender-age-physiology (GAP) index lacks patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and exercise test parameters, and traditional methods may miss complex variable interactions. The study aimed to develop a risk model of mortality in F-ILD using routine PROMs and exercise test parameters, and to compare the predictive performance with GAP staging system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between December 2018 and December 2022, 246 patients from the ILD Prospective Registry with at least 1 year of follow-up (excluding death) were enrolled. Baseline assessments included GAP, 1MSTS, 6MWD, mMRC, SGRQ, and SF36. A tree-based risk model was developed and validated with a 2:1 split. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression were used to estimate survival and hazard ratios, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The very-high-risk group (SGRQ > 34.5, 1MSTS < 21) had a significantly higher hazard ratio (HR = 5.13; 95% CI: 2.54-10.35) compared to the non-very-high-risk group. Their 1-, 2-, and 5-year mortality rates were 28.87%, 47.18%, and 82.42%, respectively, similar to GAP stage III but with narrower confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study developed a prognostic model for F-ILD combining PROMs and functional exercise data. The model, which includes the SGRQ, 6MWD, and 1MSTS, outperforms GAP staging, offering benefits like reduced patient fatigue and improved monitoring. Multicenter studies are needed to validate these findings.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06476470).</p>","PeriodicalId":21129,"journal":{"name":"Respirology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Model for Predicting Survival Outcomes Using Functional Exercise and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease: A Prospective Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Lan-Yan Yang, Hsin-Ting Yang, Yi-Hsuan Yu, Pin-Kuei Fu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/resp.70076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Fibrotic interstitial lung disease (F-ILD) has high mortality, necessitating multidimensional staging to assess severity, predict prognosis, and guide treatment. However, the gender-age-physiology (GAP) index lacks patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and exercise test parameters, and traditional methods may miss complex variable interactions. The study aimed to develop a risk model of mortality in F-ILD using routine PROMs and exercise test parameters, and to compare the predictive performance with GAP staging system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between December 2018 and December 2022, 246 patients from the ILD Prospective Registry with at least 1 year of follow-up (excluding death) were enrolled. Baseline assessments included GAP, 1MSTS, 6MWD, mMRC, SGRQ, and SF36. A tree-based risk model was developed and validated with a 2:1 split. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression were used to estimate survival and hazard ratios, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The very-high-risk group (SGRQ > 34.5, 1MSTS < 21) had a significantly higher hazard ratio (HR = 5.13; 95% CI: 2.54-10.35) compared to the non-very-high-risk group. Their 1-, 2-, and 5-year mortality rates were 28.87%, 47.18%, and 82.42%, respectively, similar to GAP stage III but with narrower confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study developed a prognostic model for F-ILD combining PROMs and functional exercise data. The model, which includes the SGRQ, 6MWD, and 1MSTS, outperforms GAP staging, offering benefits like reduced patient fatigue and improved monitoring. Multicenter studies are needed to validate these findings.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06476470).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respirology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respirology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.70076\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respirology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.70076","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:纤维化间质性肺疾病(F-ILD)死亡率高,需要多维分期来评估病情严重程度,预测预后,指导治疗。然而,性别-年龄-生理(GAP)指数缺乏患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)和运动测试参数,传统方法可能会错过复杂的变量相互作用。该研究旨在利用常规PROMs和运动试验参数建立F-ILD死亡率风险模型,并与GAP分期系统的预测性能进行比较。方法:在2018年12月至2022年12月期间,来自ILD前瞻性登记处的246名患者进行了至少1年的随访(不包括死亡)。基线评估包括GAP、1MSTS、6MWD、mMRC、SGRQ和SF36。建立了基于树的风险模型,并以2:1分割进行了验证。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线和Cox回归估计生存率和风险比,统计学意义为p。结果:极高危组(SGRQ为34.5,1MSTS)结论:本研究建立了结合PROMs和功能运动数据的F-ILD预后模型。该模型包括SGRQ、6MWD和1MSTS,优于GAP分期,具有减轻患者疲劳和改善监测等优点。需要多中心研究来验证这些发现。试验注册:该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06476470)上注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk Model for Predicting Survival Outcomes Using Functional Exercise and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease: A Prospective Observational Study.

Background and objective: Fibrotic interstitial lung disease (F-ILD) has high mortality, necessitating multidimensional staging to assess severity, predict prognosis, and guide treatment. However, the gender-age-physiology (GAP) index lacks patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and exercise test parameters, and traditional methods may miss complex variable interactions. The study aimed to develop a risk model of mortality in F-ILD using routine PROMs and exercise test parameters, and to compare the predictive performance with GAP staging system.

Methods: Between December 2018 and December 2022, 246 patients from the ILD Prospective Registry with at least 1 year of follow-up (excluding death) were enrolled. Baseline assessments included GAP, 1MSTS, 6MWD, mMRC, SGRQ, and SF36. A tree-based risk model was developed and validated with a 2:1 split. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression were used to estimate survival and hazard ratios, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.

Results: The very-high-risk group (SGRQ > 34.5, 1MSTS < 21) had a significantly higher hazard ratio (HR = 5.13; 95% CI: 2.54-10.35) compared to the non-very-high-risk group. Their 1-, 2-, and 5-year mortality rates were 28.87%, 47.18%, and 82.42%, respectively, similar to GAP stage III but with narrower confidence intervals.

Conclusion: This study developed a prognostic model for F-ILD combining PROMs and functional exercise data. The model, which includes the SGRQ, 6MWD, and 1MSTS, outperforms GAP staging, offering benefits like reduced patient fatigue and improved monitoring. Multicenter studies are needed to validate these findings.

Trial registration: The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06476470).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Respirology
Respirology 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
5.80%
发文量
225
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Respirology is a journal of international standing, publishing peer-reviewed articles of scientific excellence in clinical and clinically-relevant experimental respiratory biology and disease. Fields of research include immunology, intensive and critical care, epidemiology, cell and molecular biology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, paediatric respiratory medicine, clinical trials, interventional pulmonology and thoracic surgery. The Journal aims to encourage the international exchange of results and publishes papers in the following categories: Original Articles, Editorials, Reviews, and Correspondences. Respirology is the preferred journal of the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand, has been adopted as the preferred English journal of the Japanese Respiratory Society and the Taiwan Society of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and is an official journal of the World Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信