围手术期放疗配合全身治疗对病理N2型鳞肺癌患者生存的影响。

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Respirology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-30 DOI:10.1111/resp.70078
Yongzheng Yao, Chang Liu, Fei Pei, Changqiang Zhang, Xiaoqing Cao
{"title":"围手术期放疗配合全身治疗对病理N2型鳞肺癌患者生存的影响。","authors":"Yongzheng Yao, Chang Liu, Fei Pei, Changqiang Zhang, Xiaoqing Cao","doi":"10.1111/resp.70078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The role of perioperative radiotherapy in squamous cell lung cancer patients with pathologic N2 remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to explore the effectiveness of preoperative radiotherapy (PRRT) and postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) on survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with pathologic N2 stage III squamous cell lung cancer who received PRRT combined with preoperative systemic therapy (PRST) or PORT combined with postoperative systemic therapy (POST) were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2000 through 2021. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used for the matching of patients (1:1 ratio). Overall survival (OS) was compared among the different groups by using Kaplan-Meier analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2132 patients were included and 344 patients were excluded. After PSM, 105 patients received PRST combined with PRRT while 105 patients received PRST alone; 446 patients received POST combined with PORT while 446 patients received POST alone. For PRST combined with/without PRRT, median OS for radiotherapy was 80 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 60 to 121), which was significantly longer than that without radiotherapy (40 months [95% CI, 30 to 70]; p = 0.016); and the hazard ratio for radiotherapy was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.46 to 0.92) compared with no radiotherapy. For POST combined with/without PORT, there was no significant difference between radiotherapy and no radiotherapy for median OS (34 months [95% CI, 30 to 42] for radiotherapy versus 41 months [95% CI, 34 to 51] for no radiotherapy; p = 0.17).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results revealed that PRST combined with PRRT significantly improved OS.</p>","PeriodicalId":21129,"journal":{"name":"Respirology","volume":" ","pages":"987-994"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Perioperative Radiotherapy With Systemic Therapy on Survival of Squamous Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Pathologic N2.\",\"authors\":\"Yongzheng Yao, Chang Liu, Fei Pei, Changqiang Zhang, Xiaoqing Cao\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/resp.70078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The role of perioperative radiotherapy in squamous cell lung cancer patients with pathologic N2 remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to explore the effectiveness of preoperative radiotherapy (PRRT) and postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) on survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with pathologic N2 stage III squamous cell lung cancer who received PRRT combined with preoperative systemic therapy (PRST) or PORT combined with postoperative systemic therapy (POST) were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2000 through 2021. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used for the matching of patients (1:1 ratio). Overall survival (OS) was compared among the different groups by using Kaplan-Meier analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2132 patients were included and 344 patients were excluded. After PSM, 105 patients received PRST combined with PRRT while 105 patients received PRST alone; 446 patients received POST combined with PORT while 446 patients received POST alone. For PRST combined with/without PRRT, median OS for radiotherapy was 80 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 60 to 121), which was significantly longer than that without radiotherapy (40 months [95% CI, 30 to 70]; p = 0.016); and the hazard ratio for radiotherapy was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.46 to 0.92) compared with no radiotherapy. For POST combined with/without PORT, there was no significant difference between radiotherapy and no radiotherapy for median OS (34 months [95% CI, 30 to 42] for radiotherapy versus 41 months [95% CI, 34 to 51] for no radiotherapy; p = 0.17).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results revealed that PRST combined with PRRT significantly improved OS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respirology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"987-994\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respirology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.70078\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respirology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.70078","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:围手术期放疗在病理N2的鳞状细胞肺癌患者中的作用尚不清楚。本研究的目的是探讨术前放疗(PRRT)和术后放疗(PORT)对生存的影响。方法:从2000年至2021年的监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库中确定接受PRRT联合术前全身治疗(PRST)或PORT联合术后全身治疗(POST)的病理N2期III期鳞状细胞肺癌患者。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)对患者进行匹配,比例为1:1。采用Kaplan-Meier分析比较各组患者的总生存期(OS)。结果:共纳入2132例,排除344例。在PSM后,105例患者接受PRST联合PRRT治疗,105例患者单独接受PRST治疗;POST联合PORT治疗446例,单独POST治疗446例。对于PRST联合/不联合PRRT,放射治疗的中位OS为80个月(95%可信区间[CI], 60至121),显著高于未放射治疗的中位OS(40个月[95% CI, 30至70];p = 0.016);与未放疗相比,放疗的风险比为0.65 (95% CI, 0.46 ~ 0.92)。对于POST合并/不合并PORT,放疗和不放疗的中位生存期无显著差异(放疗组为34个月[95% CI, 30至42],不放疗组为41个月[95% CI, 34至51];p = 0.17)。结论:我们的结果显示PRST联合PRRT可显著改善OS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of Perioperative Radiotherapy With Systemic Therapy on Survival of Squamous Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Pathologic N2.

Background and objective: The role of perioperative radiotherapy in squamous cell lung cancer patients with pathologic N2 remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to explore the effectiveness of preoperative radiotherapy (PRRT) and postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) on survival.

Methods: Patients with pathologic N2 stage III squamous cell lung cancer who received PRRT combined with preoperative systemic therapy (PRST) or PORT combined with postoperative systemic therapy (POST) were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2000 through 2021. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used for the matching of patients (1:1 ratio). Overall survival (OS) was compared among the different groups by using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results: A total of 2132 patients were included and 344 patients were excluded. After PSM, 105 patients received PRST combined with PRRT while 105 patients received PRST alone; 446 patients received POST combined with PORT while 446 patients received POST alone. For PRST combined with/without PRRT, median OS for radiotherapy was 80 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 60 to 121), which was significantly longer than that without radiotherapy (40 months [95% CI, 30 to 70]; p = 0.016); and the hazard ratio for radiotherapy was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.46 to 0.92) compared with no radiotherapy. For POST combined with/without PORT, there was no significant difference between radiotherapy and no radiotherapy for median OS (34 months [95% CI, 30 to 42] for radiotherapy versus 41 months [95% CI, 34 to 51] for no radiotherapy; p = 0.17).

Conclusion: Our results revealed that PRST combined with PRRT significantly improved OS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Respirology
Respirology 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
5.80%
发文量
225
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Respirology is a journal of international standing, publishing peer-reviewed articles of scientific excellence in clinical and clinically-relevant experimental respiratory biology and disease. Fields of research include immunology, intensive and critical care, epidemiology, cell and molecular biology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, paediatric respiratory medicine, clinical trials, interventional pulmonology and thoracic surgery. The Journal aims to encourage the international exchange of results and publishes papers in the following categories: Original Articles, Editorials, Reviews, and Correspondences. Respirology is the preferred journal of the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand, has been adopted as the preferred English journal of the Japanese Respiratory Society and the Taiwan Society of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and is an official journal of the World Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信