退伍军人在干预后的正念练习。

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Tracy Herrmann, Amir Ramezani, Ryan Lackner, William R Marchand, Danielle Perez, Allison O'Connor, Joanna E Bettmann
{"title":"退伍军人在干预后的正念练习。","authors":"Tracy Herrmann, Amir Ramezani, Ryan Lackner, William R Marchand, Danielle Perez, Allison O'Connor, Joanna E Bettmann","doi":"10.1037/ser0000950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mindfulness-based interventions are complementary and integrative health interventions, widely used for mental health. However, while these interventions show significant benefits for veterans, veterans are more likely to drop out of mindfulness-based interventions than other treatments. This study aimed to evaluate veterans' motivations for and long-term engagement in mindfulness practices following mindfulness-based interventions. One hundred sixty-one veterans completed phone surveys 6-12 months after receiving mindfulness interventions through the Veteran Affairs Health Care System. Bivariate statistics were utilized to estimate relationships between demographic variables and theme scores, effect size for significant findings, and to estimate relationships between theme scores. Veterans reported that they sought treatment for trauma, health concerns, depression, and anxiety. They reported benefits from treatment in their depressive symptoms, anxiety, health concerns, and pain levels. More than half of participants reported maintaining a daily mindfulness practice following treatment. Findings suggest that different types of mindfulness interventions had comparable outcomes at follow-up, but demographic variables correlated with different veteran outcomes. Presenting certain mindfulness skills early in mindfulness-based intervention programming and building daily mindfulness practices throughout treatment may help veterans access the most efficacious components of mindfulness-based intervention and reduce the likelihood of dropout. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Veterans' engagement in mindfulness practices following intervention.\",\"authors\":\"Tracy Herrmann, Amir Ramezani, Ryan Lackner, William R Marchand, Danielle Perez, Allison O'Connor, Joanna E Bettmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/ser0000950\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mindfulness-based interventions are complementary and integrative health interventions, widely used for mental health. However, while these interventions show significant benefits for veterans, veterans are more likely to drop out of mindfulness-based interventions than other treatments. This study aimed to evaluate veterans' motivations for and long-term engagement in mindfulness practices following mindfulness-based interventions. One hundred sixty-one veterans completed phone surveys 6-12 months after receiving mindfulness interventions through the Veteran Affairs Health Care System. Bivariate statistics were utilized to estimate relationships between demographic variables and theme scores, effect size for significant findings, and to estimate relationships between theme scores. Veterans reported that they sought treatment for trauma, health concerns, depression, and anxiety. They reported benefits from treatment in their depressive symptoms, anxiety, health concerns, and pain levels. More than half of participants reported maintaining a daily mindfulness practice following treatment. Findings suggest that different types of mindfulness interventions had comparable outcomes at follow-up, but demographic variables correlated with different veteran outcomes. Presenting certain mindfulness skills early in mindfulness-based intervention programming and building daily mindfulness practices throughout treatment may help veterans access the most efficacious components of mindfulness-based intervention and reduce the likelihood of dropout. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Services\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000950\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000950","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以正念为基础的干预措施是补充和综合的健康干预措施,广泛用于心理健康。然而,虽然这些干预对退伍军人有显著的好处,但与其他治疗相比,退伍军人更有可能退出基于正念的干预。本研究旨在评估退伍军人在正念干预后长期参与正念练习的动机。在通过退伍军人事务卫生保健系统接受正念干预6-12个月后,161名退伍军人完成了电话调查。使用双变量统计来估计人口变量与主题得分之间的关系,显著发现的效应大小,以及估计主题得分之间的关系。退伍军人报告说,他们寻求治疗创伤、健康问题、抑郁和焦虑。他们报告说,治疗对他们的抑郁症状、焦虑、健康问题和疼痛水平都有好处。超过一半的参与者报告说,在治疗后,他们每天都在进行正念练习。研究结果表明,不同类型的正念干预在随访中具有可比性的结果,但人口统计学变量与不同的退伍军人结果相关。在以正念为基础的干预项目中尽早呈现某些正念技能,并在整个治疗过程中建立日常的正念练习,可能有助于退伍军人获得最有效的正念干预组成部分,并减少辍学的可能性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Veterans' engagement in mindfulness practices following intervention.

Mindfulness-based interventions are complementary and integrative health interventions, widely used for mental health. However, while these interventions show significant benefits for veterans, veterans are more likely to drop out of mindfulness-based interventions than other treatments. This study aimed to evaluate veterans' motivations for and long-term engagement in mindfulness practices following mindfulness-based interventions. One hundred sixty-one veterans completed phone surveys 6-12 months after receiving mindfulness interventions through the Veteran Affairs Health Care System. Bivariate statistics were utilized to estimate relationships between demographic variables and theme scores, effect size for significant findings, and to estimate relationships between theme scores. Veterans reported that they sought treatment for trauma, health concerns, depression, and anxiety. They reported benefits from treatment in their depressive symptoms, anxiety, health concerns, and pain levels. More than half of participants reported maintaining a daily mindfulness practice following treatment. Findings suggest that different types of mindfulness interventions had comparable outcomes at follow-up, but demographic variables correlated with different veteran outcomes. Presenting certain mindfulness skills early in mindfulness-based intervention programming and building daily mindfulness practices throughout treatment may help veterans access the most efficacious components of mindfulness-based intervention and reduce the likelihood of dropout. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Services
Psychological Services PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
216
期刊介绍: Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信