促进体育活动的参与式项目的挑战:如何扩大规模和如何扩大规模?

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-06-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0326737
Raluca Sommer, Maike Till, Lisa Boyer, Philipp Weber, Alexandra Sauter, Susanne Ferschl, Anne Herrmann-Johns, Karim Abu-Omar, Klaus Pfeifer, Peter Gelius
{"title":"促进体育活动的参与式项目的挑战:如何扩大规模和如何扩大规模?","authors":"Raluca Sommer, Maike Till, Lisa Boyer, Philipp Weber, Alexandra Sauter, Susanne Ferschl, Anne Herrmann-Johns, Karim Abu-Omar, Klaus Pfeifer, Peter Gelius","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0326737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Scaling up participatory physical activity innovations is complex. Evidence on their nature and how they become embedded in health systems and policies is limited. This paper draws on four participatory research projects promoting physical activity among various populations and settings in Germany to explore their unique participatory innovations and strategies to scale-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Document analysis and focus group interviews (n = 15) were used for a retrospective case study analysis based on the WHO-ExpandNet framework. 19 scientists of the project teams under study were approached and recruited by the authors during their collaborative work within the Capital4Health consortium. We performed a deductive content analysis to identify the innovation(s) scaled up, the implementers responsible for the process, and the context in which it took place.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The strategies employed differed depending on the intended scale-up direction: for the transfer to other sites (horizontal scale-up), projects usually scaled a participatory method; when working towards institutionalization at the systems level (vertical scale-up), they tended to scale specific actions for physical activity promotion, particularly those shown to be successful in the pilot phase of the projects. Overall, scale-up followed a strategic plan, but was continuously adjusted to setting-specific challenges and emerging opportunities.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Scaling participatory methods for physical activity promotion may require significant resources. Previously developed pilot actions seem to lend themselves to scale-up more easily, but may compromise the level of participation intended by the original project design. Within participatory research, successful scale-up will require deciding whether an innovation is appropriate for the intended context, whether it can address complex problems like health equity, and whether reducing participatory elements for the sake of improved scalability is acceptable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is essential to develop novel theoretical concepts of scalability that account for the diversities identified within participatory projects observed in our study. The findings can guide future research on strategies to improve the effective implementation and scale-up or participatory physical activity innovations, ensuring that these remain adaptable and sustainable across various settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 6","pages":"e0326737"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12208493/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The challenge of participatory projects for physical activity promotion: What to scale and how to scale?\",\"authors\":\"Raluca Sommer, Maike Till, Lisa Boyer, Philipp Weber, Alexandra Sauter, Susanne Ferschl, Anne Herrmann-Johns, Karim Abu-Omar, Klaus Pfeifer, Peter Gelius\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0326737\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Scaling up participatory physical activity innovations is complex. Evidence on their nature and how they become embedded in health systems and policies is limited. This paper draws on four participatory research projects promoting physical activity among various populations and settings in Germany to explore their unique participatory innovations and strategies to scale-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Document analysis and focus group interviews (n = 15) were used for a retrospective case study analysis based on the WHO-ExpandNet framework. 19 scientists of the project teams under study were approached and recruited by the authors during their collaborative work within the Capital4Health consortium. We performed a deductive content analysis to identify the innovation(s) scaled up, the implementers responsible for the process, and the context in which it took place.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The strategies employed differed depending on the intended scale-up direction: for the transfer to other sites (horizontal scale-up), projects usually scaled a participatory method; when working towards institutionalization at the systems level (vertical scale-up), they tended to scale specific actions for physical activity promotion, particularly those shown to be successful in the pilot phase of the projects. Overall, scale-up followed a strategic plan, but was continuously adjusted to setting-specific challenges and emerging opportunities.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Scaling participatory methods for physical activity promotion may require significant resources. Previously developed pilot actions seem to lend themselves to scale-up more easily, but may compromise the level of participation intended by the original project design. Within participatory research, successful scale-up will require deciding whether an innovation is appropriate for the intended context, whether it can address complex problems like health equity, and whether reducing participatory elements for the sake of improved scalability is acceptable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is essential to develop novel theoretical concepts of scalability that account for the diversities identified within participatory projects observed in our study. The findings can guide future research on strategies to improve the effective implementation and scale-up or participatory physical activity innovations, ensuring that these remain adaptable and sustainable across various settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 6\",\"pages\":\"e0326737\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12208493/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326737\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326737","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:扩大参与性体育活动创新是复杂的。关于它们的性质以及它们如何融入卫生系统和政策的证据有限。本文借鉴了四个参与性研究项目,在德国不同人群和环境中促进体育活动,探索其独特的参与性创新和扩大规模的策略。方法:采用文献分析和焦点小组访谈(n = 15)进行基于WHO-ExpandNet框架的回顾性案例研究分析。在Capital4Health财团的合作工作期间,作者接触并招募了所研究项目团队的19名科学家。我们执行了演绎内容分析,以确定扩展的创新,负责流程的实现者,以及它发生的环境。结果:所采用的策略取决于预期的规模扩大方向:对于转移到其他地点(水平规模扩大),项目通常采用参与式方法;当努力在系统层面实现制度化(纵向扩大规模)时,他们倾向于扩大促进体育活动的具体行动,特别是那些在项目试点阶段取得成功的行动。总体而言,扩大规模遵循了战略计划,但根据具体挑战和新出现的机遇不断进行调整。讨论:推广体育活动的参与式方法可能需要大量资源。先前开发的试点行动似乎更容易扩大规模,但可能会损害最初项目设计所期望的参与水平。在参与性研究中,成功地扩大规模将需要确定一项创新是否适合预期的环境,它是否可以解决卫生公平等复杂问题,以及为了提高可扩展性而减少参与性因素是否可以接受。结论:开发新的可扩展性理论概念是至关重要的,这些概念可以解释我们研究中观察到的参与性项目中确定的多样性。研究结果可以指导未来的战略研究,以提高参与性体育活动创新的有效实施和规模,确保这些创新在各种环境中保持适应性和可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The challenge of participatory projects for physical activity promotion: What to scale and how to scale?

The challenge of participatory projects for physical activity promotion: What to scale and how to scale?

The challenge of participatory projects for physical activity promotion: What to scale and how to scale?

The challenge of participatory projects for physical activity promotion: What to scale and how to scale?

Background: Scaling up participatory physical activity innovations is complex. Evidence on their nature and how they become embedded in health systems and policies is limited. This paper draws on four participatory research projects promoting physical activity among various populations and settings in Germany to explore their unique participatory innovations and strategies to scale-up.

Methods: Document analysis and focus group interviews (n = 15) were used for a retrospective case study analysis based on the WHO-ExpandNet framework. 19 scientists of the project teams under study were approached and recruited by the authors during their collaborative work within the Capital4Health consortium. We performed a deductive content analysis to identify the innovation(s) scaled up, the implementers responsible for the process, and the context in which it took place.

Results: The strategies employed differed depending on the intended scale-up direction: for the transfer to other sites (horizontal scale-up), projects usually scaled a participatory method; when working towards institutionalization at the systems level (vertical scale-up), they tended to scale specific actions for physical activity promotion, particularly those shown to be successful in the pilot phase of the projects. Overall, scale-up followed a strategic plan, but was continuously adjusted to setting-specific challenges and emerging opportunities.

Discussion: Scaling participatory methods for physical activity promotion may require significant resources. Previously developed pilot actions seem to lend themselves to scale-up more easily, but may compromise the level of participation intended by the original project design. Within participatory research, successful scale-up will require deciding whether an innovation is appropriate for the intended context, whether it can address complex problems like health equity, and whether reducing participatory elements for the sake of improved scalability is acceptable.

Conclusion: It is essential to develop novel theoretical concepts of scalability that account for the diversities identified within participatory projects observed in our study. The findings can guide future research on strategies to improve the effective implementation and scale-up or participatory physical activity innovations, ensuring that these remain adaptable and sustainable across various settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信