[二次植入AddOn人工晶状体矫正白内障术后不良预后]。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Amanda Argay, Péter Vámosi, Zoltán Zsolt Nagy
{"title":"[二次植入AddOn人工晶状体矫正白内障术后不良预后]。","authors":"Amanda Argay, Péter Vámosi, Zoltán Zsolt Nagy","doi":"10.1556/650.2025.33346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction: Today, the expectation for cataract surgery is to achieve the best possible refractive outcome, but ultimately in many cases the visual outcome is suboptimal, which may require further surgical correction. Often the most optimal option for surgical correction is the implantation of a secondary supplementary lens in the ciliary sulcus. Aim: The aim of our study was to assess the long-term visual outcome after secondary implantation of the 1stQ AddOn® (Medicontur Medical Engeneering Ltd.) artificial lens in the sulcus, focusing on its stability and biocompatibility. Method: We analyzed the data of patients with suboptimal visual outcomes after cataract surgery who underwent implantation of a monofocal 1stQ AddOn lens as a corrective procedure. Pre- and postoperative evaluations included uncorrected and corrected distance vision, objective and subjective (manifest) refraction, corneal endothelial cell density, and complex slit-lamp ophthalmologic examination including applanation intraocular pressure measurement. The positions of the primary and secondary lenses were assessed via ultrasound biomicroscopy 1–4 years after implantation. Statistical comparisons were performed using an unpaired two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon test. The limit of significance was 5%. Results: 14 eyes from 12 patients (mean follow-up: 34,34 ± 16,13 months) were studied. The uncorrected logMAR visual acuity significantly improved at both 1 month (p = 0,0002) and 1–4 years (p = 0,0001) postoperatively, while the corrected acuity remained stable. Endothelial cell counts did not differ significantly from preoperative values. No increases in intraocular pressure, chronic inflammation, pigment dispersion, or other complications were observed. The secondary lenses remained stable, with a mean inter-lens distance of 0,38 ± 0,16 mm. Discussion: In patients with suboptimal visual outcome after cataract surgery, 1stQ AddOn lens implantation is well planned and provides a stable long-term outcome without complications. Conclusion: Secondary lens implantation is a suitable alternative for postoperative correction in cases of suboptimal visual outcome. Orv Hetil. 2025; 166(26): 1031–1037.</p>","PeriodicalId":19911,"journal":{"name":"Orvosi hetilap","volume":"166 26","pages":"1031-1037"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Correction of suboptimal outcomes after cataract surgery using secondarily implanted AddOn intraocular lenses].\",\"authors\":\"Amanda Argay, Péter Vámosi, Zoltán Zsolt Nagy\",\"doi\":\"10.1556/650.2025.33346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Introduction: Today, the expectation for cataract surgery is to achieve the best possible refractive outcome, but ultimately in many cases the visual outcome is suboptimal, which may require further surgical correction. Often the most optimal option for surgical correction is the implantation of a secondary supplementary lens in the ciliary sulcus. Aim: The aim of our study was to assess the long-term visual outcome after secondary implantation of the 1stQ AddOn® (Medicontur Medical Engeneering Ltd.) artificial lens in the sulcus, focusing on its stability and biocompatibility. Method: We analyzed the data of patients with suboptimal visual outcomes after cataract surgery who underwent implantation of a monofocal 1stQ AddOn lens as a corrective procedure. Pre- and postoperative evaluations included uncorrected and corrected distance vision, objective and subjective (manifest) refraction, corneal endothelial cell density, and complex slit-lamp ophthalmologic examination including applanation intraocular pressure measurement. The positions of the primary and secondary lenses were assessed via ultrasound biomicroscopy 1–4 years after implantation. Statistical comparisons were performed using an unpaired two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon test. The limit of significance was 5%. Results: 14 eyes from 12 patients (mean follow-up: 34,34 ± 16,13 months) were studied. The uncorrected logMAR visual acuity significantly improved at both 1 month (p = 0,0002) and 1–4 years (p = 0,0001) postoperatively, while the corrected acuity remained stable. Endothelial cell counts did not differ significantly from preoperative values. No increases in intraocular pressure, chronic inflammation, pigment dispersion, or other complications were observed. The secondary lenses remained stable, with a mean inter-lens distance of 0,38 ± 0,16 mm. Discussion: In patients with suboptimal visual outcome after cataract surgery, 1stQ AddOn lens implantation is well planned and provides a stable long-term outcome without complications. Conclusion: Secondary lens implantation is a suitable alternative for postoperative correction in cases of suboptimal visual outcome. Orv Hetil. 2025; 166(26): 1031–1037.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orvosi hetilap\",\"volume\":\"166 26\",\"pages\":\"1031-1037\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orvosi hetilap\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1556/650.2025.33346\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orvosi hetilap","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/650.2025.33346","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

今天,对白内障手术的期望是达到最好的屈光结果,但最终在许多情况下,视力结果不是最理想的,这可能需要进一步的手术矫正。通常手术矫正的最佳选择是在睫状沟植入辅助晶状体。目的:本研究的目的是评估人工晶状体二期植入术后的长期视力结果,重点关注其稳定性和生物相容性。方法:我们分析了白内障术后视力不佳的患者的资料,这些患者接受了单焦点1stQ AddOn晶状体植入术作为矫正手术。术前和术后评估包括未矫正和矫正的远视、客观和主观(明显)屈光、角膜内皮细胞密度和复杂的裂隙灯眼科检查,包括压平眼压测量。植入后1-4年,通过超声生物显微镜评估初级和次级晶状体的位置。统计学比较采用非配对双样本t检验或Wilcoxon检验。显著性限为5%。结果:12例患者14只眼(平均随访时间:34,34±16,13个月)。术后1个月(p = 0.0002)和1 ~ 4年(p = 0.0001)未矫正的logMAR视力均有显著改善,矫正后的视力保持稳定。内皮细胞计数与术前无明显差异。没有观察到眼压升高、慢性炎症、色素弥散或其他并发症。副透镜保持稳定,平均透镜间距离为0.38±0.16 mm。讨论:对于白内障术后视力不佳的患者,1stQ AddOn晶状体植入术计划良好,可提供稳定的长期结果,无并发症。结论:二次晶状体植入术是视力不佳患者术后矫正的理想选择。Orv Hetil. 2025;166(26): 1031 - 1037。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Correction of suboptimal outcomes after cataract surgery using secondarily implanted AddOn intraocular lenses].

Introduction: Today, the expectation for cataract surgery is to achieve the best possible refractive outcome, but ultimately in many cases the visual outcome is suboptimal, which may require further surgical correction. Often the most optimal option for surgical correction is the implantation of a secondary supplementary lens in the ciliary sulcus. Aim: The aim of our study was to assess the long-term visual outcome after secondary implantation of the 1stQ AddOn® (Medicontur Medical Engeneering Ltd.) artificial lens in the sulcus, focusing on its stability and biocompatibility. Method: We analyzed the data of patients with suboptimal visual outcomes after cataract surgery who underwent implantation of a monofocal 1stQ AddOn lens as a corrective procedure. Pre- and postoperative evaluations included uncorrected and corrected distance vision, objective and subjective (manifest) refraction, corneal endothelial cell density, and complex slit-lamp ophthalmologic examination including applanation intraocular pressure measurement. The positions of the primary and secondary lenses were assessed via ultrasound biomicroscopy 1–4 years after implantation. Statistical comparisons were performed using an unpaired two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon test. The limit of significance was 5%. Results: 14 eyes from 12 patients (mean follow-up: 34,34 ± 16,13 months) were studied. The uncorrected logMAR visual acuity significantly improved at both 1 month (p = 0,0002) and 1–4 years (p = 0,0001) postoperatively, while the corrected acuity remained stable. Endothelial cell counts did not differ significantly from preoperative values. No increases in intraocular pressure, chronic inflammation, pigment dispersion, or other complications were observed. The secondary lenses remained stable, with a mean inter-lens distance of 0,38 ± 0,16 mm. Discussion: In patients with suboptimal visual outcome after cataract surgery, 1stQ AddOn lens implantation is well planned and provides a stable long-term outcome without complications. Conclusion: Secondary lens implantation is a suitable alternative for postoperative correction in cases of suboptimal visual outcome. Orv Hetil. 2025; 166(26): 1031–1037.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orvosi hetilap
Orvosi hetilap MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
50.00%
发文量
274
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original and review papers in the fields of experimental and clinical medicine. It covers epidemiology, diagnostics, therapy and the prevention of human diseases as well as papers of medical history. Orvosi Hetilap is the oldest, still in-print, Hungarian publication and also the one-and-only weekly published scientific journal in Hungary. The strategy of the journal is based on the Curatorium of the Lajos Markusovszky Foundation and on the National and International Editorial Board. The 150 year-old journal is part of the Hungarian Cultural Heritage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信