DPYD药物遗传学检测的临床实施路径-来自外部质量评估(EQA)提供商和大学检测中心的长期经验。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Maren Hedtke, Volker Ast, Johannes Leidheiser, Anja Kessler, Michael Neumaier, Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz, Verena Haselmann
{"title":"DPYD药物遗传学检测的临床实施路径-来自外部质量评估(EQA)提供商和大学检测中心的长期经验。","authors":"Maren Hedtke, Volker Ast, Johannes Leidheiser, Anja Kessler, Michael Neumaier, Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz, Verena Haselmann","doi":"10.1159/000546912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pharmacogenetics (PGx) plays a crucial role in precision medicine by identifying genetic variations that influence drug metabolism. For example, variants in dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) have an impact on DPD enzyme activity and consequently on the metabolization of 5-fluorouracil, which can lead to severe adverse drug reactions. Therefore, pre-emptive DPYD genotyping was endorsed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in mid-2020 and subsequently included in national guidelines. In this study, we evaluated the impact of these guidelines on the request behavior for DPYD genotyping at a German university hospital in Mannheim (UMM) and on participation in external quality assessment (EQA) schemes in the European setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 386 DPYD genetic tests performed as part of standard care at the University Medical Center Mannheim from 2015 to 2021. Patient data, including demographics, diagnosis, and treatment, were obtained from electronic health records. Additionally, EQA data from the Reference Institute for Bioanalytics from 2015 to 2023 were analyzed to evaluate the adoption of DPYD testing across European laboratories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study observed a significant increase in DPYD genotyping requests at UMM following the EMA recommendation in 2020, with an up to 29-fold increase compared to previous years. Furthermore, a shift from post-treatment to pre-treatment genotyping was observed. DPYD variants were detected in 6.5% of cases, with DPYD HapB3 being the most frequent. EQA data from 23,114 genotypes demonstrated a growing participation in proficiency testing across Europe, indicating broader clinical adoption, and confirmed the impact on testing requirements in national guidelines on integration into clinical workflows.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The integration of DPYD testing into national guidelines has significantly increased its clinical adoption, enhancing patient safety in oncology. However, standardization challenges remain. Further harmonization of guidelines and expansion of PGx testing may further optimize chemotherapy safety in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Path to Clinical Implementation of <italic>DPYD</italic> Pharmacogenetic Testing: Long-Term Experience from an External Quality Assessment Provider and a University Testing Center.\",\"authors\":\"Maren Hedtke, Volker Ast, Johannes Leidheiser, Anja Kessler, Michael Neumaier, Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz, Verena Haselmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000546912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pharmacogenetics (PGx) plays a crucial role in precision medicine by identifying genetic variations that influence drug metabolism. For example, variants in dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) have an impact on DPD enzyme activity and consequently on the metabolization of 5-fluorouracil, which can lead to severe adverse drug reactions. Therefore, pre-emptive DPYD genotyping was endorsed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in mid-2020 and subsequently included in national guidelines. In this study, we evaluated the impact of these guidelines on the request behavior for DPYD genotyping at a German university hospital in Mannheim (UMM) and on participation in external quality assessment (EQA) schemes in the European setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 386 DPYD genetic tests performed as part of standard care at the University Medical Center Mannheim from 2015 to 2021. Patient data, including demographics, diagnosis, and treatment, were obtained from electronic health records. Additionally, EQA data from the Reference Institute for Bioanalytics from 2015 to 2023 were analyzed to evaluate the adoption of DPYD testing across European laboratories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study observed a significant increase in DPYD genotyping requests at UMM following the EMA recommendation in 2020, with an up to 29-fold increase compared to previous years. Furthermore, a shift from post-treatment to pre-treatment genotyping was observed. DPYD variants were detected in 6.5% of cases, with DPYD HapB3 being the most frequent. EQA data from 23,114 genotypes demonstrated a growing participation in proficiency testing across Europe, indicating broader clinical adoption, and confirmed the impact on testing requirements in national guidelines on integration into clinical workflows.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The integration of DPYD testing into national guidelines has significantly increased its clinical adoption, enhancing patient safety in oncology. However, standardization challenges remain. Further harmonization of guidelines and expansion of PGx testing may further optimize chemotherapy safety in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncology Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncology Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546912\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546912","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

药物遗传学(PGx)通过识别影响药物代谢的遗传变异在精准医学中起着至关重要的作用。例如,二氢嘧啶脱氢酶DPYD的变异会影响DPD酶的活性,从而影响5-氟尿嘧啶的代谢,从而导致严重的药物不良反应。因此,先发制人的DPYD基因分型在2020年中期得到了欧洲药品管理局(EMA)的认可,随后被纳入国家指南。在这项研究中,我们评估了这些指南对德国曼海姆大学医院(UMM) DPYD基因分型请求行为的影响,以及在欧洲环境中参与外部质量评估(EQA)计划的影响。方法:对2015年至2021年在曼海姆大学医学中心进行的386例DPYD基因检测作为标准治疗的一部分进行回顾性分析。从电子健康记录中获得患者数据,包括人口统计、诊断和治疗。此外,还分析了2015年至2023年生物分析参考研究所的外部质量评估数据,以评估DPYD测试在欧洲实验室的采用情况。结果:该研究发现,在2020年EMA推荐后,UMM的DPYD基因分型请求显着增加,与前几年相比增加了29倍。此外,观察到从治疗后到治疗前基因分型的转变。6.5%的病例检测到DPYD变异,其中DPYD HapB3最为常见。来自23114个基因型的EQA数据表明,在整个欧洲,越来越多的人参与到能力测试中来,这表明临床应用越来越广泛,并证实了国家指南中关于整合临床工作流程的测试要求的影响。结论:将DPYD检测纳入国家指南显著提高了其临床应用,提高了肿瘤患者的安全性。然而,标准化方面的挑战依然存在。指南的进一步统一和PGx检测的扩大可能会进一步优化未来的化疗安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Path to Clinical Implementation of DPYD Pharmacogenetic Testing: Long-Term Experience from an External Quality Assessment Provider and a University Testing Center.

Introduction: Pharmacogenetics (PGx) plays a crucial role in precision medicine by identifying genetic variations that influence drug metabolism. For example, variants in dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) have an impact on DPD enzyme activity and consequently on the metabolization of 5-fluorouracil, which can lead to severe adverse drug reactions. Therefore, pre-emptive DPYD genotyping was endorsed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in mid-2020 and subsequently included in national guidelines. In this study, we evaluated the impact of these guidelines on the request behavior for DPYD genotyping at a German university hospital in Mannheim (UMM) and on participation in external quality assessment (EQA) schemes in the European setting.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 386 DPYD genetic tests performed as part of standard care at the University Medical Center Mannheim from 2015 to 2021. Patient data, including demographics, diagnosis, and treatment, were obtained from electronic health records. Additionally, EQA data from the Reference Institute for Bioanalytics from 2015 to 2023 were analyzed to evaluate the adoption of DPYD testing across European laboratories.

Results: The study observed a significant increase in DPYD genotyping requests at UMM following the EMA recommendation in 2020, with an up to 29-fold increase compared to previous years. Furthermore, a shift from post-treatment to pre-treatment genotyping was observed. DPYD variants were detected in 6.5% of cases, with DPYD HapB3 being the most frequent. EQA data from 23,114 genotypes demonstrated a growing participation in proficiency testing across Europe, indicating broader clinical adoption, and confirmed the impact on testing requirements in national guidelines on integration into clinical workflows.

Conclusion: The integration of DPYD testing into national guidelines has significantly increased its clinical adoption, enhancing patient safety in oncology. However, standardization challenges remain. Further harmonization of guidelines and expansion of PGx testing may further optimize chemotherapy safety in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: With the first issue in 2014, the journal ''Onkologie'' has changed its title to ''Oncology Research and Treatment''. By this change, publisher and editor set the scene for the further development of this interdisciplinary journal. The English title makes it clear that the articles are published in English – a logical step for the journal, which is listed in all relevant international databases. For excellent manuscripts, a ''Fast Track'' was introduced: The review is carried out within 2 weeks; after acceptance the papers are published online within 14 days and immediately released as ''Editor’s Choice'' to provide the authors with maximum visibility of their results. Interesting case reports are published in the section ''Novel Insights from Clinical Practice'' which clearly highlights the scientific advances which the report presents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信