侵袭性肺曲霉病、毛霉菌病、细菌性肺炎和结核病CT分割的深度学习模型:一项多中心研究。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Mycoses Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1111/myc.70084
Yun Li, Feifei Huang, Deyan Chen, Youwen Zhang, Xia Zhang, Lina Liang, Junnan Pan, Lunfang Tan, Shuyi Liu, Junfeng Lin, Zhengtu Li, Guodong Hu, Huai Chen, Chengbao Peng, Feng Ye, Jinping Zheng
{"title":"侵袭性肺曲霉病、毛霉菌病、细菌性肺炎和结核病CT分割的深度学习模型:一项多中心研究。","authors":"Yun Li, Feifei Huang, Deyan Chen, Youwen Zhang, Xia Zhang, Lina Liang, Junnan Pan, Lunfang Tan, Shuyi Liu, Junfeng Lin, Zhengtu Li, Guodong Hu, Huai Chen, Chengbao Peng, Feng Ye, Jinping Zheng","doi":"10.1111/myc.70084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The differential diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA), pulmonary mucormycosis (PM), bacterial pneumonia (BP) and pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) are challenging due to overlapping clinical and imaging features. Manual CT lesion segmentation is time-consuming, deep-learning (DL)-based segmentation models offer a promising solution, yet disease-specific models for these infections remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to develop and validate dedicated CT segmentation models for IPA, PM, BP and PTB to enhance diagnostic accuracy. Methods:Retrospective multi-centre data (115 IPA, 53 PM, 130 BP, 125 PTB) were used for training/internal validation, with 21 IPA, 8PM, 30 BP and 31 PTB cases for external validation. Expert-annotated lesions served as ground truth. An improved 3D U-Net architecture was employed for segmentation, with preprocessing steps including normalisations, cropping and data augmentation. Performance was evaluated using Dice coefficients. Results:Internal validation achieved Dice scores of 78.83% (IPA), 93.38% (PM), 80.12% (BP) and 90.47% (PTB). External validation showed slightly reduced but robust performance: 75.09% (IPA), 77.53% (PM), 67.40% (BP) and 80.07% (PTB). The PM model demonstrated exceptional generalisability, scoring 83.41% on IPA data. Cross-validation revealed mutual applicability, with IPA/PTB models achieving > 75% Dice for each other's lesions. BP segmentation showed lower but clinically acceptable performance ( >72%), likely due to complex radiological patterns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disease-specific DL segmentation models exhibited high accuracy, particularly for PM and PTB. While IPA and BP models require refinement, all demonstrated cross-disease utility, suggesting immediate clinical value for preliminary lesion annotation. Future efforts should enhance datasets and optimise models for intricate cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":18797,"journal":{"name":"Mycoses","volume":"68 7","pages":"e70084"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep Learning Models for CT Segmentation of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis, Mucormycosis, Bacterial Pneumonia and Tuberculosis: A Multicentre Study.\",\"authors\":\"Yun Li, Feifei Huang, Deyan Chen, Youwen Zhang, Xia Zhang, Lina Liang, Junnan Pan, Lunfang Tan, Shuyi Liu, Junfeng Lin, Zhengtu Li, Guodong Hu, Huai Chen, Chengbao Peng, Feng Ye, Jinping Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/myc.70084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The differential diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA), pulmonary mucormycosis (PM), bacterial pneumonia (BP) and pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) are challenging due to overlapping clinical and imaging features. Manual CT lesion segmentation is time-consuming, deep-learning (DL)-based segmentation models offer a promising solution, yet disease-specific models for these infections remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to develop and validate dedicated CT segmentation models for IPA, PM, BP and PTB to enhance diagnostic accuracy. Methods:Retrospective multi-centre data (115 IPA, 53 PM, 130 BP, 125 PTB) were used for training/internal validation, with 21 IPA, 8PM, 30 BP and 31 PTB cases for external validation. Expert-annotated lesions served as ground truth. An improved 3D U-Net architecture was employed for segmentation, with preprocessing steps including normalisations, cropping and data augmentation. Performance was evaluated using Dice coefficients. Results:Internal validation achieved Dice scores of 78.83% (IPA), 93.38% (PM), 80.12% (BP) and 90.47% (PTB). External validation showed slightly reduced but robust performance: 75.09% (IPA), 77.53% (PM), 67.40% (BP) and 80.07% (PTB). The PM model demonstrated exceptional generalisability, scoring 83.41% on IPA data. Cross-validation revealed mutual applicability, with IPA/PTB models achieving > 75% Dice for each other's lesions. BP segmentation showed lower but clinically acceptable performance ( >72%), likely due to complex radiological patterns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disease-specific DL segmentation models exhibited high accuracy, particularly for PM and PTB. While IPA and BP models require refinement, all demonstrated cross-disease utility, suggesting immediate clinical value for preliminary lesion annotation. Future efforts should enhance datasets and optimise models for intricate cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mycoses\",\"volume\":\"68 7\",\"pages\":\"e70084\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mycoses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/myc.70084\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mycoses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/myc.70084","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:侵袭性肺曲霉病(IPA)、肺毛霉病(PM)、细菌性肺炎(BP)和肺结核(PTB)的鉴别诊断由于临床和影像学特征重叠而具有挑战性。手动CT病变分割是耗时的,基于深度学习(DL)的分割模型提供了一个很有前途的解决方案,但这些感染的疾病特异性模型仍未得到充分探索。目的:我们旨在开发和验证IPA, PM, BP和PTB的专用CT分割模型,以提高诊断准确性。方法:采用回顾性多中心数据(115例IPA, 53 PM, 130 BP, 125 PTB)进行训练/内部验证,21例IPA, 8PM, 30 BP和31例PTB进行外部验证。专家注释的病变作为基本事实。采用改进的3D U-Net架构进行分割,预处理步骤包括归一化、裁剪和数据增强。使用Dice系数评估性能。结果:内部验证的Dice评分分别为78.83% (IPA)、93.38% (PM)、80.12% (BP)和90.47% (PTB)。外部验证结果显示,IPA(75.09%)、PM(77.53%)、BP(67.40%)和PTB(80.07%)的性能略有下降,但较为稳健。PM模型在IPA数据上的通用性达到83.41%。交叉验证显示了相互的适用性,IPA/PTB模型对彼此病变的概率达到了75%。BP分割显示较低但临床可接受的表现(>72%),可能是由于复杂的放射学模式。结论:疾病特异性DL分割模型具有很高的准确性,特别是对于PM和PTB。虽然IPA和BP模型需要改进,但它们都显示出跨疾病的实用性,表明初步病变注释具有直接的临床价值。未来的努力应该加强数据集和优化复杂案例的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deep Learning Models for CT Segmentation of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis, Mucormycosis, Bacterial Pneumonia and Tuberculosis: A Multicentre Study.

Background: The differential diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA), pulmonary mucormycosis (PM), bacterial pneumonia (BP) and pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) are challenging due to overlapping clinical and imaging features. Manual CT lesion segmentation is time-consuming, deep-learning (DL)-based segmentation models offer a promising solution, yet disease-specific models for these infections remain underexplored.

Objectives: We aimed to develop and validate dedicated CT segmentation models for IPA, PM, BP and PTB to enhance diagnostic accuracy. Methods:Retrospective multi-centre data (115 IPA, 53 PM, 130 BP, 125 PTB) were used for training/internal validation, with 21 IPA, 8PM, 30 BP and 31 PTB cases for external validation. Expert-annotated lesions served as ground truth. An improved 3D U-Net architecture was employed for segmentation, with preprocessing steps including normalisations, cropping and data augmentation. Performance was evaluated using Dice coefficients. Results:Internal validation achieved Dice scores of 78.83% (IPA), 93.38% (PM), 80.12% (BP) and 90.47% (PTB). External validation showed slightly reduced but robust performance: 75.09% (IPA), 77.53% (PM), 67.40% (BP) and 80.07% (PTB). The PM model demonstrated exceptional generalisability, scoring 83.41% on IPA data. Cross-validation revealed mutual applicability, with IPA/PTB models achieving > 75% Dice for each other's lesions. BP segmentation showed lower but clinically acceptable performance ( >72%), likely due to complex radiological patterns.

Conclusions: Disease-specific DL segmentation models exhibited high accuracy, particularly for PM and PTB. While IPA and BP models require refinement, all demonstrated cross-disease utility, suggesting immediate clinical value for preliminary lesion annotation. Future efforts should enhance datasets and optimise models for intricate cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mycoses
Mycoses 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
8.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Mycoses provides an international forum for original papers in English on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, therapy, prophylaxis, and epidemiology of fungal infectious diseases in humans as well as on the biology of pathogenic fungi. Medical mycology as part of medical microbiology is advancing rapidly. Effective therapeutic strategies are already available in chemotherapy and are being further developed. Their application requires reliable laboratory diagnostic techniques, which, in turn, result from mycological basic research. Opportunistic mycoses vary greatly in their clinical and pathological symptoms, because the underlying disease of a patient at risk decisively determines their symptomatology and progress. The journal Mycoses is therefore of interest to scientists in fundamental mycological research, mycological laboratory diagnosticians and clinicians interested in fungal infections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信