Pearce B Haldeman, Liane Chun, Cyril Harfouche, Ricardo Rosales, Conner Trimm, Christopher Reid, James H Flint, Frank Chiarappa
{"title":"局部抗生素治疗减少四肢肉瘤术后手术部位感染。","authors":"Pearce B Haldeman, Liane Chun, Cyril Harfouche, Ricardo Rosales, Conner Trimm, Christopher Reid, James H Flint, Frank Chiarappa","doi":"10.1002/jso.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The morbidity associated with the treatment of extremity sarcoma resection is significant, and surgical site infection (SSI) remains a prevalent concern. This cohort study compares the outcomes of patients who received local, intra-wound antibiotic powder with those who did not during the resection of extremity sarcomas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 83 patients. Of these, 25 (30%) patients had received local vancomycin and/or tobramycin antibiotic powder just before wound closure, while 58 (70%) underwent routine closure without administration of local antibiotics. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and surgical characteristics were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The local antibiotic group consisted of larger tumors (11.50 ± 7.65 vs. 7.79 ± 5.27 cm; p = 0.038) undergoing longer surgeries (594 ± 323 vs. 360 ± 285 min; p = 0.003) with more estimated blood loss (426 ± 399 vs. 177 ± 539 mL; p = 0.023). The postoperative SSI rate was lower in the antibiotic group at 16% versus 40% in the no antibiotic group (p = 0.043). When accounting for possible confounders, the odds ratio of SSI in the antibiotic group versus no antibiotic group was 0.0747 [0.00882, 0.404] (p = 0.0075).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the significantly greater tumor burden in the antibiotic group, this study suggests an effective role for local antibiotic powder administration in the prevention of postoperative infections in extremity sarcoma surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Local Antibiotic Administration Decreases Surgical Site Infections Following Extremity Sarcoma Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Pearce B Haldeman, Liane Chun, Cyril Harfouche, Ricardo Rosales, Conner Trimm, Christopher Reid, James H Flint, Frank Chiarappa\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jso.70017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The morbidity associated with the treatment of extremity sarcoma resection is significant, and surgical site infection (SSI) remains a prevalent concern. This cohort study compares the outcomes of patients who received local, intra-wound antibiotic powder with those who did not during the resection of extremity sarcomas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 83 patients. Of these, 25 (30%) patients had received local vancomycin and/or tobramycin antibiotic powder just before wound closure, while 58 (70%) underwent routine closure without administration of local antibiotics. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and surgical characteristics were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The local antibiotic group consisted of larger tumors (11.50 ± 7.65 vs. 7.79 ± 5.27 cm; p = 0.038) undergoing longer surgeries (594 ± 323 vs. 360 ± 285 min; p = 0.003) with more estimated blood loss (426 ± 399 vs. 177 ± 539 mL; p = 0.023). The postoperative SSI rate was lower in the antibiotic group at 16% versus 40% in the no antibiotic group (p = 0.043). When accounting for possible confounders, the odds ratio of SSI in the antibiotic group versus no antibiotic group was 0.0747 [0.00882, 0.404] (p = 0.0075).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the significantly greater tumor burden in the antibiotic group, this study suggests an effective role for local antibiotic powder administration in the prevention of postoperative infections in extremity sarcoma surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70017\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:与肢体肉瘤切除术治疗相关的发病率是显著的,手术部位感染(SSI)仍然是一个普遍关注的问题。这项队列研究比较了在肢体肉瘤切除术期间接受局部伤口内抗生素粉末治疗的患者和未接受伤口内抗生素粉末治疗的患者的结果。方法:本研究纳入83例患者。其中,25例(30%)患者在伤口闭合前接受了局部万古霉素和/或妥布霉素抗生素粉末,58例(70%)患者在没有使用局部抗生素的情况下进行了常规闭合。收集患者人口统计学、肿瘤特征和手术特征。结果:局部抗生素组肿瘤较大(11.50±7.65 vs. 7.79±5.27 cm;P = 0.038)手术时间较长(594±323 vs 360±285 min);p = 0.003),估计失血量更多(426±399比177±539 mL;p = 0.023)。抗生素组术后SSI发生率为16%,低于未使用抗生素组的40% (p = 0.043)。考虑到可能的混杂因素,抗生素组与无抗生素组的SSI比值比为0.0747 [0.00882,0.404](p = 0.0075)。结论:尽管抗生素组的肿瘤负担明显更大,但本研究提示局部给药抗生素粉末在预防四肢肉瘤术后感染方面具有有效作用。
Local Antibiotic Administration Decreases Surgical Site Infections Following Extremity Sarcoma Surgery.
Background and objectives: The morbidity associated with the treatment of extremity sarcoma resection is significant, and surgical site infection (SSI) remains a prevalent concern. This cohort study compares the outcomes of patients who received local, intra-wound antibiotic powder with those who did not during the resection of extremity sarcomas.
Methods: This study included 83 patients. Of these, 25 (30%) patients had received local vancomycin and/or tobramycin antibiotic powder just before wound closure, while 58 (70%) underwent routine closure without administration of local antibiotics. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and surgical characteristics were collected.
Results: The local antibiotic group consisted of larger tumors (11.50 ± 7.65 vs. 7.79 ± 5.27 cm; p = 0.038) undergoing longer surgeries (594 ± 323 vs. 360 ± 285 min; p = 0.003) with more estimated blood loss (426 ± 399 vs. 177 ± 539 mL; p = 0.023). The postoperative SSI rate was lower in the antibiotic group at 16% versus 40% in the no antibiotic group (p = 0.043). When accounting for possible confounders, the odds ratio of SSI in the antibiotic group versus no antibiotic group was 0.0747 [0.00882, 0.404] (p = 0.0075).
Conclusion: Despite the significantly greater tumor burden in the antibiotic group, this study suggests an effective role for local antibiotic powder administration in the prevention of postoperative infections in extremity sarcoma surgery.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.