局部抗生素治疗减少四肢肉瘤术后手术部位感染。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Pearce B Haldeman, Liane Chun, Cyril Harfouche, Ricardo Rosales, Conner Trimm, Christopher Reid, James H Flint, Frank Chiarappa
{"title":"局部抗生素治疗减少四肢肉瘤术后手术部位感染。","authors":"Pearce B Haldeman, Liane Chun, Cyril Harfouche, Ricardo Rosales, Conner Trimm, Christopher Reid, James H Flint, Frank Chiarappa","doi":"10.1002/jso.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The morbidity associated with the treatment of extremity sarcoma resection is significant, and surgical site infection (SSI) remains a prevalent concern. This cohort study compares the outcomes of patients who received local, intra-wound antibiotic powder with those who did not during the resection of extremity sarcomas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 83 patients. Of these, 25 (30%) patients had received local vancomycin and/or tobramycin antibiotic powder just before wound closure, while 58 (70%) underwent routine closure without administration of local antibiotics. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and surgical characteristics were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The local antibiotic group consisted of larger tumors (11.50 ± 7.65 vs. 7.79 ± 5.27 cm; p = 0.038) undergoing longer surgeries (594 ± 323 vs. 360 ± 285 min; p = 0.003) with more estimated blood loss (426 ± 399 vs. 177 ± 539 mL; p = 0.023). The postoperative SSI rate was lower in the antibiotic group at 16% versus 40% in the no antibiotic group (p = 0.043). When accounting for possible confounders, the odds ratio of SSI in the antibiotic group versus no antibiotic group was 0.0747 [0.00882, 0.404] (p = 0.0075).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the significantly greater tumor burden in the antibiotic group, this study suggests an effective role for local antibiotic powder administration in the prevention of postoperative infections in extremity sarcoma surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Local Antibiotic Administration Decreases Surgical Site Infections Following Extremity Sarcoma Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Pearce B Haldeman, Liane Chun, Cyril Harfouche, Ricardo Rosales, Conner Trimm, Christopher Reid, James H Flint, Frank Chiarappa\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jso.70017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The morbidity associated with the treatment of extremity sarcoma resection is significant, and surgical site infection (SSI) remains a prevalent concern. This cohort study compares the outcomes of patients who received local, intra-wound antibiotic powder with those who did not during the resection of extremity sarcomas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 83 patients. Of these, 25 (30%) patients had received local vancomycin and/or tobramycin antibiotic powder just before wound closure, while 58 (70%) underwent routine closure without administration of local antibiotics. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and surgical characteristics were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The local antibiotic group consisted of larger tumors (11.50 ± 7.65 vs. 7.79 ± 5.27 cm; p = 0.038) undergoing longer surgeries (594 ± 323 vs. 360 ± 285 min; p = 0.003) with more estimated blood loss (426 ± 399 vs. 177 ± 539 mL; p = 0.023). The postoperative SSI rate was lower in the antibiotic group at 16% versus 40% in the no antibiotic group (p = 0.043). When accounting for possible confounders, the odds ratio of SSI in the antibiotic group versus no antibiotic group was 0.0747 [0.00882, 0.404] (p = 0.0075).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the significantly greater tumor burden in the antibiotic group, this study suggests an effective role for local antibiotic powder administration in the prevention of postoperative infections in extremity sarcoma surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70017\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:与肢体肉瘤切除术治疗相关的发病率是显著的,手术部位感染(SSI)仍然是一个普遍关注的问题。这项队列研究比较了在肢体肉瘤切除术期间接受局部伤口内抗生素粉末治疗的患者和未接受伤口内抗生素粉末治疗的患者的结果。方法:本研究纳入83例患者。其中,25例(30%)患者在伤口闭合前接受了局部万古霉素和/或妥布霉素抗生素粉末,58例(70%)患者在没有使用局部抗生素的情况下进行了常规闭合。收集患者人口统计学、肿瘤特征和手术特征。结果:局部抗生素组肿瘤较大(11.50±7.65 vs. 7.79±5.27 cm;P = 0.038)手术时间较长(594±323 vs 360±285 min);p = 0.003),估计失血量更多(426±399比177±539 mL;p = 0.023)。抗生素组术后SSI发生率为16%,低于未使用抗生素组的40% (p = 0.043)。考虑到可能的混杂因素,抗生素组与无抗生素组的SSI比值比为0.0747 [0.00882,0.404](p = 0.0075)。结论:尽管抗生素组的肿瘤负担明显更大,但本研究提示局部给药抗生素粉末在预防四肢肉瘤术后感染方面具有有效作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Local Antibiotic Administration Decreases Surgical Site Infections Following Extremity Sarcoma Surgery.

Background and objectives: The morbidity associated with the treatment of extremity sarcoma resection is significant, and surgical site infection (SSI) remains a prevalent concern. This cohort study compares the outcomes of patients who received local, intra-wound antibiotic powder with those who did not during the resection of extremity sarcomas.

Methods: This study included 83 patients. Of these, 25 (30%) patients had received local vancomycin and/or tobramycin antibiotic powder just before wound closure, while 58 (70%) underwent routine closure without administration of local antibiotics. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and surgical characteristics were collected.

Results: The local antibiotic group consisted of larger tumors (11.50 ± 7.65 vs. 7.79 ± 5.27 cm; p = 0.038) undergoing longer surgeries (594 ± 323 vs. 360 ± 285 min; p = 0.003) with more estimated blood loss (426 ± 399 vs. 177 ± 539 mL; p = 0.023). The postoperative SSI rate was lower in the antibiotic group at 16% versus 40% in the no antibiotic group (p = 0.043). When accounting for possible confounders, the odds ratio of SSI in the antibiotic group versus no antibiotic group was 0.0747 [0.00882, 0.404] (p = 0.0075).

Conclusion: Despite the significantly greater tumor burden in the antibiotic group, this study suggests an effective role for local antibiotic powder administration in the prevention of postoperative infections in extremity sarcoma surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信