伤口保护器对胰十二指肠切除术后并发症的影响:20960例国家手术质量改进计划分析。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Tyrell Wees, Sukhdeep Jatana, Kevin Verhoeff, A M James Shapiro, David L Bigam, Khaled Dajani, Blaire Anderson
{"title":"伤口保护器对胰十二指肠切除术后并发症的影响:20960例国家手术质量改进计划分析。","authors":"Tyrell Wees, Sukhdeep Jatana, Kevin Verhoeff, A M James Shapiro, David L Bigam, Khaled Dajani, Blaire Anderson","doi":"10.1002/jso.70020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Wound protectors (WPs) have been shown to decrease postoperative wound complications, yet limited data exist supporting WP for pancreaticoduodenectomies, with limited uptake in practice. We evaluated the effect of WP in pancreaticoduodenectomies on surgical site infections (SSIs) and serious complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilizing the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, we included patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy between 2017 and 2021. Baseline demographics and complications were compared between WP and no WP cohorts. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify the effect of WP use on 30-day complications and factors associated with WP use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 20 960 patients, 6167 (29.4%) used a WP. WPs were more commonly used in lower ASA classes, more comorbid patients, and preoperative weight loss. WP use was associated with increased operative time but decreased length of stay, SSIs, organ space infection, pancreatic fistula, reoperation, and serious complication. WP was independently associated with decreased serious complication (aOR 0.80, p < 0.001) and SSI (aOR 0.57, p < 0.001). Factors associated with increased likelihood of WP use include preoperative weight loss, broad-spectrum antibiotic use, absence of bleeding disorder and firmer pancreatic texture.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>WP use during pancreaticoduodenectomy is associated with decreased number of postoperative complications and SSI. Future prospective randomized studies should assess cost-benefit and barriers to use to increase uptake of WP use.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Wound Protectors on Complications Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis of 20 960 Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Tyrell Wees, Sukhdeep Jatana, Kevin Verhoeff, A M James Shapiro, David L Bigam, Khaled Dajani, Blaire Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jso.70020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Wound protectors (WPs) have been shown to decrease postoperative wound complications, yet limited data exist supporting WP for pancreaticoduodenectomies, with limited uptake in practice. We evaluated the effect of WP in pancreaticoduodenectomies on surgical site infections (SSIs) and serious complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilizing the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, we included patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy between 2017 and 2021. Baseline demographics and complications were compared between WP and no WP cohorts. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify the effect of WP use on 30-day complications and factors associated with WP use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 20 960 patients, 6167 (29.4%) used a WP. WPs were more commonly used in lower ASA classes, more comorbid patients, and preoperative weight loss. WP use was associated with increased operative time but decreased length of stay, SSIs, organ space infection, pancreatic fistula, reoperation, and serious complication. WP was independently associated with decreased serious complication (aOR 0.80, p < 0.001) and SSI (aOR 0.57, p < 0.001). Factors associated with increased likelihood of WP use include preoperative weight loss, broad-spectrum antibiotic use, absence of bleeding disorder and firmer pancreatic texture.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>WP use during pancreaticoduodenectomy is associated with decreased number of postoperative complications and SSI. Future prospective randomized studies should assess cost-benefit and barriers to use to increase uptake of WP use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70020\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:伤口保护器(WPs)已被证明可以减少术后伤口并发症,但支持WP用于胰十二指肠切除术的数据有限,在实践中应用有限。我们评估了在胰十二指肠切除术中使用白蜡对手术部位感染(ssi)和严重并发症的影响。方法:利用国家外科质量改进计划数据库,我们纳入了2017年至2021年间接受胰十二指肠切除术的患者。比较基线人口统计学和并发症在WP和无WP队列之间。进行多因素logistic回归,以确定使用WP对30天并发症的影响以及与WP使用相关的因素。结果:20960例患者中,6167例(29.4%)使用了WP。WPs更常用于ASA等级较低、合并症较多和术前体重减轻的患者。WP的使用增加了手术时间,但减少了住院时间、ssi、器官间隙感染、胰瘘、再手术和严重并发症。结论:胰十二指肠切除术中使用WP与术后并发症和SSI的减少有关。未来的前瞻性随机研究应评估成本效益和使用障碍,以增加WP的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Wound Protectors on Complications Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis of 20 960 Patients.

Background: Wound protectors (WPs) have been shown to decrease postoperative wound complications, yet limited data exist supporting WP for pancreaticoduodenectomies, with limited uptake in practice. We evaluated the effect of WP in pancreaticoduodenectomies on surgical site infections (SSIs) and serious complications.

Methods: Utilizing the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, we included patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy between 2017 and 2021. Baseline demographics and complications were compared between WP and no WP cohorts. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify the effect of WP use on 30-day complications and factors associated with WP use.

Results: Of 20 960 patients, 6167 (29.4%) used a WP. WPs were more commonly used in lower ASA classes, more comorbid patients, and preoperative weight loss. WP use was associated with increased operative time but decreased length of stay, SSIs, organ space infection, pancreatic fistula, reoperation, and serious complication. WP was independently associated with decreased serious complication (aOR 0.80, p < 0.001) and SSI (aOR 0.57, p < 0.001). Factors associated with increased likelihood of WP use include preoperative weight loss, broad-spectrum antibiotic use, absence of bleeding disorder and firmer pancreatic texture.

Conclusion: WP use during pancreaticoduodenectomy is associated with decreased number of postoperative complications and SSI. Future prospective randomized studies should assess cost-benefit and barriers to use to increase uptake of WP use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信