失眠患者的治疗偏好和医疗合并症:相关因素和对治疗结果的影响。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Nynke Rauwerda, Irene Pot, Annemarie Braamse, Annemieke van Straten, Pythia van Nieuwkerk, Myrthe Boss, Marian Rikkert, Hans Knoop
{"title":"失眠患者的治疗偏好和医疗合并症:相关因素和对治疗结果的影响。","authors":"Nynke Rauwerda, Irene Pot, Annemarie Braamse, Annemieke van Straten, Pythia van Nieuwkerk, Myrthe Boss, Marian Rikkert, Hans Knoop","doi":"10.1111/jsr.70115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Insomnia is common in patients with medical comorbidity. First-line treatment for insomnia is cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I). However, some patients with medical comorbidities prefer pharmacological treatment. This study aimed to (1) identify factors influencing treatment preference in these patients, and (2) assess how aligning treatment with patient preferences impacts outcomes for CBT-I and low-dose Amitriptyline. This study was part of a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial. The study involved 187 participants who were randomly assigned to either CBT-I or Amitriptyline for 12 weeks and 54 participants who refused to participate in the randomised controlled trial. Treatment preferences were assessed at baseline using the Treatment Perception and Preferences (TPP) questionnaire and insomnia severity was assessed before and after treatment with the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). Multiple and linear regression analyses (p < 0.001, adj. R<sup>2</sup> = 0.06) revealed that higher age and attributing insomnia to psychological causes predicted a stronger preference for CBT-I while severe insomnia predicted a stronger preference for Amitriptyline. There were no differences in treatment-outcome between amitriptyline and CBT-I for those without a treatment preference, neither for those receiving their treatment preference. However, for patients not receiving their treatment preference, amitriptyline performed significantly worse than CBT-I (M = 13.72 (1.72) vs. M = 9.83 (0.80), p = 0.045). In conclusion, age, attributing insomnia to psychological causes and insomnia severity predict treatment preference in patients with medical comorbidity. Our findings suggest that when treatment does not align with a patient's preference, CBT-I results in a better treatment-outcome than medication. Trial Registration: Dutch Trial Register: NTR NL7971.</p>","PeriodicalId":17057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sleep Research","volume":" ","pages":"e70115"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment Preferences in Patients With Insomnia and Medical Comorbidity: Associated Factors and Impact on Treatment-Outcome.\",\"authors\":\"Nynke Rauwerda, Irene Pot, Annemarie Braamse, Annemieke van Straten, Pythia van Nieuwkerk, Myrthe Boss, Marian Rikkert, Hans Knoop\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jsr.70115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Insomnia is common in patients with medical comorbidity. First-line treatment for insomnia is cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I). However, some patients with medical comorbidities prefer pharmacological treatment. This study aimed to (1) identify factors influencing treatment preference in these patients, and (2) assess how aligning treatment with patient preferences impacts outcomes for CBT-I and low-dose Amitriptyline. This study was part of a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial. The study involved 187 participants who were randomly assigned to either CBT-I or Amitriptyline for 12 weeks and 54 participants who refused to participate in the randomised controlled trial. Treatment preferences were assessed at baseline using the Treatment Perception and Preferences (TPP) questionnaire and insomnia severity was assessed before and after treatment with the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). Multiple and linear regression analyses (p < 0.001, adj. R<sup>2</sup> = 0.06) revealed that higher age and attributing insomnia to psychological causes predicted a stronger preference for CBT-I while severe insomnia predicted a stronger preference for Amitriptyline. There were no differences in treatment-outcome between amitriptyline and CBT-I for those without a treatment preference, neither for those receiving their treatment preference. However, for patients not receiving their treatment preference, amitriptyline performed significantly worse than CBT-I (M = 13.72 (1.72) vs. M = 9.83 (0.80), p = 0.045). In conclusion, age, attributing insomnia to psychological causes and insomnia severity predict treatment preference in patients with medical comorbidity. Our findings suggest that when treatment does not align with a patient's preference, CBT-I results in a better treatment-outcome than medication. Trial Registration: Dutch Trial Register: NTR NL7971.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sleep Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sleep Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.70115\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sleep Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.70115","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

失眠在有医学合并症的患者中很常见。失眠的一线治疗是失眠的认知行为疗法(CBT-I)。然而,一些有医学合并症的患者更喜欢药物治疗。本研究旨在(1)确定影响这些患者治疗偏好的因素,以及(2)评估根据患者偏好调整治疗如何影响CBT-I和低剂量阿米替林的结果。本研究是一项非劣效性随机对照试验的一部分。该研究涉及187名参与者,他们被随机分配到CBT-I或阿米替林12周,54名参与者拒绝参加随机对照试验。在基线时使用治疗感知和偏好(TPP)问卷评估治疗偏好,使用失眠严重程度指数(ISI)评估治疗前后的失眠严重程度。多元回归分析和线性回归分析(p 2 = 0.06)显示,年龄越大和将失眠归因于心理原因的患者对CBT-I的偏好越强,而严重失眠的患者对阿米替林的偏好越强。阿米替林和CBT-I在治疗结果上对没有治疗偏好的患者和接受治疗偏好的患者没有差异。然而,对于未接受首选治疗的患者,阿米替林的治疗效果明显差于CBT-I (M = 13.72 (1.72) vs. M = 9.83 (0.80), p = 0.045)。综上所述,年龄、失眠的心理原因和失眠的严重程度预测了医疗合并症患者的治疗偏好。我们的研究结果表明,当治疗不符合患者的偏好时,CBT-I的治疗效果优于药物治疗。试验注册:荷兰试验注册:NTR NL7971。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treatment Preferences in Patients With Insomnia and Medical Comorbidity: Associated Factors and Impact on Treatment-Outcome.

Insomnia is common in patients with medical comorbidity. First-line treatment for insomnia is cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I). However, some patients with medical comorbidities prefer pharmacological treatment. This study aimed to (1) identify factors influencing treatment preference in these patients, and (2) assess how aligning treatment with patient preferences impacts outcomes for CBT-I and low-dose Amitriptyline. This study was part of a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial. The study involved 187 participants who were randomly assigned to either CBT-I or Amitriptyline for 12 weeks and 54 participants who refused to participate in the randomised controlled trial. Treatment preferences were assessed at baseline using the Treatment Perception and Preferences (TPP) questionnaire and insomnia severity was assessed before and after treatment with the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). Multiple and linear regression analyses (p < 0.001, adj. R2 = 0.06) revealed that higher age and attributing insomnia to psychological causes predicted a stronger preference for CBT-I while severe insomnia predicted a stronger preference for Amitriptyline. There were no differences in treatment-outcome between amitriptyline and CBT-I for those without a treatment preference, neither for those receiving their treatment preference. However, for patients not receiving their treatment preference, amitriptyline performed significantly worse than CBT-I (M = 13.72 (1.72) vs. M = 9.83 (0.80), p = 0.045). In conclusion, age, attributing insomnia to psychological causes and insomnia severity predict treatment preference in patients with medical comorbidity. Our findings suggest that when treatment does not align with a patient's preference, CBT-I results in a better treatment-outcome than medication. Trial Registration: Dutch Trial Register: NTR NL7971.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sleep Research
Journal of Sleep Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
6.80%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sleep Research is dedicated to basic and clinical sleep research. The Journal publishes original research papers and invited reviews in all areas of sleep research (including biological rhythms). The Journal aims to promote the exchange of ideas between basic and clinical sleep researchers coming from a wide range of backgrounds and disciplines. The Journal will achieve this by publishing papers which use multidisciplinary and novel approaches to answer important questions about sleep, as well as its disorders and the treatment thereof.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信