Nikolaus Wachtel, Riccardo E Giunta, Maximilian Hirschmann, Marc Hellweg, Tim Nuernberger, Nicholas Moellhoff, Denis Ehrl
{"title":"游离股薄肌瓣的侵入性如何?供体部位发病率的前瞻性研究。","authors":"Nikolaus Wachtel, Riccardo E Giunta, Maximilian Hirschmann, Marc Hellweg, Tim Nuernberger, Nicholas Moellhoff, Denis Ehrl","doi":"10.1055/a-2632-2663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Free gracilis muscle (GM) flaps represent a reliable workhorse procedure in the field of plastic and trauma surgery. However, only a small number of studies have examined this large group of patients regarding the morbidity of flap harvest. The aim of this prospective study was therefore to objectively investigate the morbidity of free GM flaps.A control group (<i>n</i> = 100) without surgery was recruited to assess interindividual differences in strength and range of motion (ROM) in the hip and knee joint (dominant vs. nondominant side). Additionally, for 50 patients with free GM flap surgery, these parameters were assessed in an identical manner.The control group showed significant interindividual differences in strength for abduction and adduction in the hip joint when comparing the dominant to the nondominant side, but no significant differences in the ROM. GM flap harvest led to no significant differences in maximum force 20.3 (± 13.8) months after surgery in all parameters/movements that were assessed. However, the ROM for abduction in the ipsilateral hip joint was significantly reduced after surgery.The GM flap has a low donor site morbidity and should therefore be considered as a first-line option for microsurgical reconstructive procedures. Moreover, the low morbidity is not affected by preexisting differences in strength when comparing the dominant to the nondominant side.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Invasive is the Free Gracilis Muscle Flap? A Prospective Study on Donor Site Morbidity.\",\"authors\":\"Nikolaus Wachtel, Riccardo E Giunta, Maximilian Hirschmann, Marc Hellweg, Tim Nuernberger, Nicholas Moellhoff, Denis Ehrl\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2632-2663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Free gracilis muscle (GM) flaps represent a reliable workhorse procedure in the field of plastic and trauma surgery. However, only a small number of studies have examined this large group of patients regarding the morbidity of flap harvest. The aim of this prospective study was therefore to objectively investigate the morbidity of free GM flaps.A control group (<i>n</i> = 100) without surgery was recruited to assess interindividual differences in strength and range of motion (ROM) in the hip and knee joint (dominant vs. nondominant side). Additionally, for 50 patients with free GM flap surgery, these parameters were assessed in an identical manner.The control group showed significant interindividual differences in strength for abduction and adduction in the hip joint when comparing the dominant to the nondominant side, but no significant differences in the ROM. GM flap harvest led to no significant differences in maximum force 20.3 (± 13.8) months after surgery in all parameters/movements that were assessed. However, the ROM for abduction in the ipsilateral hip joint was significantly reduced after surgery.The GM flap has a low donor site morbidity and should therefore be considered as a first-line option for microsurgical reconstructive procedures. Moreover, the low morbidity is not affected by preexisting differences in strength when comparing the dominant to the nondominant side.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2632-2663\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2632-2663","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
How Invasive is the Free Gracilis Muscle Flap? A Prospective Study on Donor Site Morbidity.
Free gracilis muscle (GM) flaps represent a reliable workhorse procedure in the field of plastic and trauma surgery. However, only a small number of studies have examined this large group of patients regarding the morbidity of flap harvest. The aim of this prospective study was therefore to objectively investigate the morbidity of free GM flaps.A control group (n = 100) without surgery was recruited to assess interindividual differences in strength and range of motion (ROM) in the hip and knee joint (dominant vs. nondominant side). Additionally, for 50 patients with free GM flap surgery, these parameters were assessed in an identical manner.The control group showed significant interindividual differences in strength for abduction and adduction in the hip joint when comparing the dominant to the nondominant side, but no significant differences in the ROM. GM flap harvest led to no significant differences in maximum force 20.3 (± 13.8) months after surgery in all parameters/movements that were assessed. However, the ROM for abduction in the ipsilateral hip joint was significantly reduced after surgery.The GM flap has a low donor site morbidity and should therefore be considered as a first-line option for microsurgical reconstructive procedures. Moreover, the low morbidity is not affected by preexisting differences in strength when comparing the dominant to the nondominant side.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers.
The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases.
The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.