丝状针与长针治疗肩周炎的疗效:一项随机对照试验。

IF 1.8 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Dong Phuong Tran, Thai Viet Nguyen
{"title":"丝状针与长针治疗肩周炎的疗效:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Dong Phuong Tran, Thai Viet Nguyen","doi":"10.3831/KPI.2025.28.2.100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Periarthritis of the shoulder (PAS) affects 2-5% of the population and results in significant morbidity. This study evaluates the effectiveness of long needle acupuncture compared to filiform needle acupuncture in managing PAS, with a focus on pain relief and improved range of motion (ROM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 60 PAS patients who were randomly assigned to receive either long-needle acupuncture (treatment group) or filiform needle acupuncture (control group). Patients in the treatment group received long-needle acupuncture, while those in the control group received filiform needle acupuncture. Both groups underwent 14 treatment sessions over two weeks. The primary outcome was pain reduction measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included improvements in shoulder abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-treatment comparative analysis showed no improvement difference in pain scores between the two groups (p = 0.02) after the Bonferroni adjustment. Specifically, the treatment group exhibited a decrease from 5.9 to 0.9 (p < 0.001), while the control group decreased from 5.5 to 2.2 (p < 0.001). The treatment group experienced more significant improvements in ROM compared to the control group (p < 0.001 for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Long-needle acupuncture is as effective as filiform needle acupuncture in managing pain from PAS, but long-needle acupuncture offers better improvements in ROM compared to filiform needle acupuncture. These findings support its integration into PAS treatment regimens, particularly for enhancing functional mobility.</p>","PeriodicalId":16769,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacopuncture","volume":"28 2","pages":"100-107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12177560/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Filiform Needle Acupuncture and Long Needle Acupuncture in Managing Periarthritis of the Shoulder: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Dong Phuong Tran, Thai Viet Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.3831/KPI.2025.28.2.100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Periarthritis of the shoulder (PAS) affects 2-5% of the population and results in significant morbidity. This study evaluates the effectiveness of long needle acupuncture compared to filiform needle acupuncture in managing PAS, with a focus on pain relief and improved range of motion (ROM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 60 PAS patients who were randomly assigned to receive either long-needle acupuncture (treatment group) or filiform needle acupuncture (control group). Patients in the treatment group received long-needle acupuncture, while those in the control group received filiform needle acupuncture. Both groups underwent 14 treatment sessions over two weeks. The primary outcome was pain reduction measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included improvements in shoulder abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-treatment comparative analysis showed no improvement difference in pain scores between the two groups (p = 0.02) after the Bonferroni adjustment. Specifically, the treatment group exhibited a decrease from 5.9 to 0.9 (p < 0.001), while the control group decreased from 5.5 to 2.2 (p < 0.001). The treatment group experienced more significant improvements in ROM compared to the control group (p < 0.001 for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Long-needle acupuncture is as effective as filiform needle acupuncture in managing pain from PAS, but long-needle acupuncture offers better improvements in ROM compared to filiform needle acupuncture. These findings support its integration into PAS treatment regimens, particularly for enhancing functional mobility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacopuncture\",\"volume\":\"28 2\",\"pages\":\"100-107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12177560/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacopuncture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3831/KPI.2025.28.2.100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacopuncture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3831/KPI.2025.28.2.100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肩周炎(PAS)影响2-5%的人群,并导致显著的发病率。本研究评估了长针针刺与丝状针针刺治疗PAS的有效性,重点是疼痛缓解和活动范围(ROM)的改善。方法:采用随机对照试验方法,将60例PAS患者随机分为长针针刺组(治疗组)和丝状针针刺组(对照组)。治疗组采用长针针刺,对照组采用丝状针针刺。两组都在两周内接受了14次治疗。主要结局是通过视觉模拟评分(VAS)测量疼痛减轻。次要结果包括肩部外展、内旋和外旋的改善。结果:治疗后比较分析显示,经Bonferroni调整后,两组疼痛评分无明显改善(p = 0.02)。具体来说,治疗组从5.9下降到0.9 (p < 0.001),而对照组从5.5下降到2.2 (p < 0.001)。与对照组相比,治疗组在ROM方面的改善更为显著(p < 0.001)。结论:长针治疗PAS疼痛的效果与丝状针相同,但对ROM的改善效果优于丝状针。这些发现支持将其纳入PAS治疗方案,特别是用于增强功能活动能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effectiveness of Filiform Needle Acupuncture and Long Needle Acupuncture in Managing Periarthritis of the Shoulder: a randomized controlled trial.

Effectiveness of Filiform Needle Acupuncture and Long Needle Acupuncture in Managing Periarthritis of the Shoulder: a randomized controlled trial.

Objectives: Periarthritis of the shoulder (PAS) affects 2-5% of the population and results in significant morbidity. This study evaluates the effectiveness of long needle acupuncture compared to filiform needle acupuncture in managing PAS, with a focus on pain relief and improved range of motion (ROM).

Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 60 PAS patients who were randomly assigned to receive either long-needle acupuncture (treatment group) or filiform needle acupuncture (control group). Patients in the treatment group received long-needle acupuncture, while those in the control group received filiform needle acupuncture. Both groups underwent 14 treatment sessions over two weeks. The primary outcome was pain reduction measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included improvements in shoulder abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation.

Results: Post-treatment comparative analysis showed no improvement difference in pain scores between the two groups (p = 0.02) after the Bonferroni adjustment. Specifically, the treatment group exhibited a decrease from 5.9 to 0.9 (p < 0.001), while the control group decreased from 5.5 to 2.2 (p < 0.001). The treatment group experienced more significant improvements in ROM compared to the control group (p < 0.001 for all).

Conclusion: Long-needle acupuncture is as effective as filiform needle acupuncture in managing pain from PAS, but long-needle acupuncture offers better improvements in ROM compared to filiform needle acupuncture. These findings support its integration into PAS treatment regimens, particularly for enhancing functional mobility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacopuncture
Journal of Pharmacopuncture INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
42
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmacopuncture covers a wide range of basic and clinical science research relevant to all aspects of the biotechnology of integrated approaches using both pharmacology and acupuncture therapeutics, including research involving pharmacology, acupuncture studies and pharmacopuncture studies. The subjects are mainly divided into three categories: pharmacology (applied phytomedicine, plant sciences, pharmacology, toxicology, medicinal plants, traditional medicines, herbal medicine, Sasang constitutional medicine, herbal formulae, foods, agricultural technologies, naturopathy, etc.), acupuncture (acupressure, electroacupuncture, laser acupuncture, moxibustion, cupping, etc.), and pharmacopuncture (aqua-acupuncture, meridian pharmacopuncture, eight-principles pharmacopuncture, animal-based pharmacopuncture, mountain ginseng pharmacopuncture, bee venom therapy, needle embedding therapy, implant therapy, etc.). Other categories include chuna treatment, veterinary acupuncture and related animal studies, alternative medicines for treating cancer and cancer-related symptoms, etc. Broader topical coverage on the effects of acupuncture, the medical plants used in traditional and alternative medicine, pharmacological action and other related modalities, such as anthroposophy, homeopathy, ayurveda, bioelectromagnetic therapy, chiropractic, neural therapy and meditation, can be considered to be within the journal’s scope if based on acupoints and meridians. Submissions of original articles, review articles, systematic reviews, case reports, brief reports, opinions, commentaries, medical lectures, letters to the editor, photo-essays, technical notes, and book reviews are encouraged. Providing free access to the full text of all current and archived articles on its website (www.journal.ac), also searchable through a Google Scholar search.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信