{"title":"丝状针与长针治疗肩周炎的疗效:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Dong Phuong Tran, Thai Viet Nguyen","doi":"10.3831/KPI.2025.28.2.100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Periarthritis of the shoulder (PAS) affects 2-5% of the population and results in significant morbidity. This study evaluates the effectiveness of long needle acupuncture compared to filiform needle acupuncture in managing PAS, with a focus on pain relief and improved range of motion (ROM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 60 PAS patients who were randomly assigned to receive either long-needle acupuncture (treatment group) or filiform needle acupuncture (control group). Patients in the treatment group received long-needle acupuncture, while those in the control group received filiform needle acupuncture. Both groups underwent 14 treatment sessions over two weeks. The primary outcome was pain reduction measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included improvements in shoulder abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-treatment comparative analysis showed no improvement difference in pain scores between the two groups (p = 0.02) after the Bonferroni adjustment. Specifically, the treatment group exhibited a decrease from 5.9 to 0.9 (p < 0.001), while the control group decreased from 5.5 to 2.2 (p < 0.001). The treatment group experienced more significant improvements in ROM compared to the control group (p < 0.001 for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Long-needle acupuncture is as effective as filiform needle acupuncture in managing pain from PAS, but long-needle acupuncture offers better improvements in ROM compared to filiform needle acupuncture. These findings support its integration into PAS treatment regimens, particularly for enhancing functional mobility.</p>","PeriodicalId":16769,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacopuncture","volume":"28 2","pages":"100-107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12177560/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Filiform Needle Acupuncture and Long Needle Acupuncture in Managing Periarthritis of the Shoulder: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Dong Phuong Tran, Thai Viet Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.3831/KPI.2025.28.2.100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Periarthritis of the shoulder (PAS) affects 2-5% of the population and results in significant morbidity. This study evaluates the effectiveness of long needle acupuncture compared to filiform needle acupuncture in managing PAS, with a focus on pain relief and improved range of motion (ROM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 60 PAS patients who were randomly assigned to receive either long-needle acupuncture (treatment group) or filiform needle acupuncture (control group). Patients in the treatment group received long-needle acupuncture, while those in the control group received filiform needle acupuncture. Both groups underwent 14 treatment sessions over two weeks. The primary outcome was pain reduction measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included improvements in shoulder abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-treatment comparative analysis showed no improvement difference in pain scores between the two groups (p = 0.02) after the Bonferroni adjustment. Specifically, the treatment group exhibited a decrease from 5.9 to 0.9 (p < 0.001), while the control group decreased from 5.5 to 2.2 (p < 0.001). The treatment group experienced more significant improvements in ROM compared to the control group (p < 0.001 for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Long-needle acupuncture is as effective as filiform needle acupuncture in managing pain from PAS, but long-needle acupuncture offers better improvements in ROM compared to filiform needle acupuncture. These findings support its integration into PAS treatment regimens, particularly for enhancing functional mobility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacopuncture\",\"volume\":\"28 2\",\"pages\":\"100-107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12177560/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacopuncture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3831/KPI.2025.28.2.100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacopuncture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3831/KPI.2025.28.2.100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effectiveness of Filiform Needle Acupuncture and Long Needle Acupuncture in Managing Periarthritis of the Shoulder: a randomized controlled trial.
Objectives: Periarthritis of the shoulder (PAS) affects 2-5% of the population and results in significant morbidity. This study evaluates the effectiveness of long needle acupuncture compared to filiform needle acupuncture in managing PAS, with a focus on pain relief and improved range of motion (ROM).
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 60 PAS patients who were randomly assigned to receive either long-needle acupuncture (treatment group) or filiform needle acupuncture (control group). Patients in the treatment group received long-needle acupuncture, while those in the control group received filiform needle acupuncture. Both groups underwent 14 treatment sessions over two weeks. The primary outcome was pain reduction measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included improvements in shoulder abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation.
Results: Post-treatment comparative analysis showed no improvement difference in pain scores between the two groups (p = 0.02) after the Bonferroni adjustment. Specifically, the treatment group exhibited a decrease from 5.9 to 0.9 (p < 0.001), while the control group decreased from 5.5 to 2.2 (p < 0.001). The treatment group experienced more significant improvements in ROM compared to the control group (p < 0.001 for all).
Conclusion: Long-needle acupuncture is as effective as filiform needle acupuncture in managing pain from PAS, but long-needle acupuncture offers better improvements in ROM compared to filiform needle acupuncture. These findings support its integration into PAS treatment regimens, particularly for enhancing functional mobility.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pharmacopuncture covers a wide range of basic and clinical science research relevant to all aspects of the biotechnology of integrated approaches using both pharmacology and acupuncture therapeutics, including research involving pharmacology, acupuncture studies and pharmacopuncture studies. The subjects are mainly divided into three categories: pharmacology (applied phytomedicine, plant sciences, pharmacology, toxicology, medicinal plants, traditional medicines, herbal medicine, Sasang constitutional medicine, herbal formulae, foods, agricultural technologies, naturopathy, etc.), acupuncture (acupressure, electroacupuncture, laser acupuncture, moxibustion, cupping, etc.), and pharmacopuncture (aqua-acupuncture, meridian pharmacopuncture, eight-principles pharmacopuncture, animal-based pharmacopuncture, mountain ginseng pharmacopuncture, bee venom therapy, needle embedding therapy, implant therapy, etc.). Other categories include chuna treatment, veterinary acupuncture and related animal studies, alternative medicines for treating cancer and cancer-related symptoms, etc. Broader topical coverage on the effects of acupuncture, the medical plants used in traditional and alternative medicine, pharmacological action and other related modalities, such as anthroposophy, homeopathy, ayurveda, bioelectromagnetic therapy, chiropractic, neural therapy and meditation, can be considered to be within the journal’s scope if based on acupoints and meridians. Submissions of original articles, review articles, systematic reviews, case reports, brief reports, opinions, commentaries, medical lectures, letters to the editor, photo-essays, technical notes, and book reviews are encouraged. Providing free access to the full text of all current and archived articles on its website (www.journal.ac), also searchable through a Google Scholar search.