儿童肠脑相互作用障碍在初级保健和医院护理:特征的比较。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Ilse N Ganzevoort, Marjolein Y Berger, Arine M Vlieger, Marc A Benninga, Michiel R De Boer, Gea A Holtman
{"title":"儿童肠脑相互作用障碍在初级保健和医院护理:特征的比较。","authors":"Ilse N Ganzevoort, Marjolein Y Berger, Arine M Vlieger, Marc A Benninga, Michiel R De Boer, Gea A Holtman","doi":"10.1002/jpn3.70129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare characteristics of children with functional abdominal pain (FAP) or irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) between primary and hospital care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study makes a cross-sectional comparison of baseline data from two randomised controlled trials (RCTs): one in Dutch primary care and one in Dutch hospital care, including secondary and tertiary care. This study included children aged 8-17 years old with FAP or IBS fulfilling the Rome III or IV criteria. Outcome measures were age, gender, Rome criteria diagnosis, duration of abdominal pain symptoms, pain intensity and frequency scores, school absenteeism, pain beliefs, somatisation score, anxiety and depression scores, and health-related quality of life scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 367 children were compared (110 in primary care, 257 in hospital care). Children seen in primary care were younger (9.8 years, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.4-10.7 vs. 13.6 years, 95% CI: 12.9-14.1), had a lower abdominal pain intensity score (12.0, 95% CI: 9.0-13.0 vs. 15.0, 95% CI: 15.0-16.0), frequency score (10.5, 95% CI: 9.0-13.5 vs. 16.0, 95% CI: 14.0-17.0) and somatisation score (15.0, 95% CI: 12.0-17.0 vs. 22.0, 95% CI: 20.0-25.0) compared to hospital care. A lower proportion of children had missed school because of their abdominal pain (57.3%, 95% CI: 48.2-66.4 vs. 75.9%, 95% CI: 70.4-80.9). Other characteristics were similar between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Children in primary care may differ from those in hospital care in terms of age, pain, somatisation, and school absenteeism, suggesting potential treatment response differences. Therefore, research in primary care is needed to guide evidence-based treatment and appropriate referral decisions for general practitioners.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>Primary care study: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05636358. Hospital care study: Dutch Trial Register NL2597.</p>","PeriodicalId":16694,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"530-539"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12408964/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Children with disorders of gut-brain interaction in primary care versus hospital care: A comparison of characteristics.\",\"authors\":\"Ilse N Ganzevoort, Marjolein Y Berger, Arine M Vlieger, Marc A Benninga, Michiel R De Boer, Gea A Holtman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jpn3.70129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare characteristics of children with functional abdominal pain (FAP) or irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) between primary and hospital care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study makes a cross-sectional comparison of baseline data from two randomised controlled trials (RCTs): one in Dutch primary care and one in Dutch hospital care, including secondary and tertiary care. This study included children aged 8-17 years old with FAP or IBS fulfilling the Rome III or IV criteria. Outcome measures were age, gender, Rome criteria diagnosis, duration of abdominal pain symptoms, pain intensity and frequency scores, school absenteeism, pain beliefs, somatisation score, anxiety and depression scores, and health-related quality of life scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 367 children were compared (110 in primary care, 257 in hospital care). Children seen in primary care were younger (9.8 years, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.4-10.7 vs. 13.6 years, 95% CI: 12.9-14.1), had a lower abdominal pain intensity score (12.0, 95% CI: 9.0-13.0 vs. 15.0, 95% CI: 15.0-16.0), frequency score (10.5, 95% CI: 9.0-13.5 vs. 16.0, 95% CI: 14.0-17.0) and somatisation score (15.0, 95% CI: 12.0-17.0 vs. 22.0, 95% CI: 20.0-25.0) compared to hospital care. A lower proportion of children had missed school because of their abdominal pain (57.3%, 95% CI: 48.2-66.4 vs. 75.9%, 95% CI: 70.4-80.9). Other characteristics were similar between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Children in primary care may differ from those in hospital care in terms of age, pain, somatisation, and school absenteeism, suggesting potential treatment response differences. Therefore, research in primary care is needed to guide evidence-based treatment and appropriate referral decisions for general practitioners.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>Primary care study: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05636358. Hospital care study: Dutch Trial Register NL2597.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"530-539\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12408964/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpn3.70129\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpn3.70129","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较初级和医院治疗的功能性腹痛(FAP)或肠易激综合征(IBS)患儿的特点。方法:本研究对两项随机对照试验(rct)的基线数据进行横断面比较:一项在荷兰初级保健中,另一项在荷兰医院护理中,包括二级和三级护理。这项研究包括8-17岁的FAP或IBS符合Rome III或IV标准的儿童。结果测量包括年龄、性别、罗马标准诊断、腹痛症状持续时间、疼痛强度和频率评分、旷课、疼痛信念、躯体化评分、焦虑和抑郁评分以及与健康相关的生活质量评分。结果:共有367名儿童进行了比较(110名在初级保健,257名在医院护理)。接受初级保健的儿童年龄更小(9.8岁,95%可信区间[CI]: 9.4-10.7比13.6岁,95% CI: 12.9-14.1),腹痛强度评分(12.0,95% CI: 9.0-13.0比15.0,95% CI: 15.0-16.0),频率评分(10.5,95% CI: 9.0-13.5比16.0,95% CI: 14.0-17.0)和躯体化评分(15.0,95% CI: 12.0-17.0比22.0,95% CI: 20.0-25.0)低于医院护理。因腹痛缺课的儿童比例较低(57.3%,95% CI: 48.2-66.4 vs. 75.9%, 95% CI: 70.4-80.9)。两组之间的其他特征相似。结论:接受初级保健的儿童在年龄、疼痛、躯体化和学校缺勤方面可能与接受医院护理的儿童不同,这表明可能存在治疗反应差异。因此,需要对初级保健进行研究,以指导循证治疗,并为全科医生做出适当的转诊决定。试验注册:初级保健研究:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05636358。医院护理研究:荷兰试验注册NL2597。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Children with disorders of gut-brain interaction in primary care versus hospital care: A comparison of characteristics.

Children with disorders of gut-brain interaction in primary care versus hospital care: A comparison of characteristics.

Children with disorders of gut-brain interaction in primary care versus hospital care: A comparison of characteristics.

Objectives: To compare characteristics of children with functional abdominal pain (FAP) or irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) between primary and hospital care.

Methods: This study makes a cross-sectional comparison of baseline data from two randomised controlled trials (RCTs): one in Dutch primary care and one in Dutch hospital care, including secondary and tertiary care. This study included children aged 8-17 years old with FAP or IBS fulfilling the Rome III or IV criteria. Outcome measures were age, gender, Rome criteria diagnosis, duration of abdominal pain symptoms, pain intensity and frequency scores, school absenteeism, pain beliefs, somatisation score, anxiety and depression scores, and health-related quality of life scores.

Results: A total of 367 children were compared (110 in primary care, 257 in hospital care). Children seen in primary care were younger (9.8 years, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.4-10.7 vs. 13.6 years, 95% CI: 12.9-14.1), had a lower abdominal pain intensity score (12.0, 95% CI: 9.0-13.0 vs. 15.0, 95% CI: 15.0-16.0), frequency score (10.5, 95% CI: 9.0-13.5 vs. 16.0, 95% CI: 14.0-17.0) and somatisation score (15.0, 95% CI: 12.0-17.0 vs. 22.0, 95% CI: 20.0-25.0) compared to hospital care. A lower proportion of children had missed school because of their abdominal pain (57.3%, 95% CI: 48.2-66.4 vs. 75.9%, 95% CI: 70.4-80.9). Other characteristics were similar between groups.

Conclusions: Children in primary care may differ from those in hospital care in terms of age, pain, somatisation, and school absenteeism, suggesting potential treatment response differences. Therefore, research in primary care is needed to guide evidence-based treatment and appropriate referral decisions for general practitioners.

Clinical trial registration: Primary care study: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05636358. Hospital care study: Dutch Trial Register NL2597.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.80%
发文量
467
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (JPGN) provides a forum for original papers and reviews dealing with pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, including normal and abnormal functions of the alimentary tract and its associated organs, including the salivary glands, pancreas, gallbladder, and liver. Particular emphasis is on development and its relation to infant and childhood nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信