Benjamin Gill, Cody Tidwell, Jonathan M Hagedorn, Alexandra M Moreira, Marco Lawandy, Benjamin Boyett, Justin Schappell, Usman Latif, Scott Pritzlaff, Ioannis Skaribas, Hemant Kalia, Samir Sheth, Maricela Schnur, Sean Li, Denise Lester, Trevor Ellico, Ramana Naidu, David Russo, Christopher Massey, Einar Ottestad, Kevin Vorenkamp, Henry Vucetic, Matthew J Pingree, David Abejón, Mehul J Desai, David Dickerson, Amitabh Gulati, Dawood Sayed, Timothy R Deer
{"title":"美国疼痛和神经科学学会关于使用60天周围神经刺激疗法的共识指南。一个神经元生活指南项目。","authors":"Benjamin Gill, Cody Tidwell, Jonathan M Hagedorn, Alexandra M Moreira, Marco Lawandy, Benjamin Boyett, Justin Schappell, Usman Latif, Scott Pritzlaff, Ioannis Skaribas, Hemant Kalia, Samir Sheth, Maricela Schnur, Sean Li, Denise Lester, Trevor Ellico, Ramana Naidu, David Russo, Christopher Massey, Einar Ottestad, Kevin Vorenkamp, Henry Vucetic, Matthew J Pingree, David Abejón, Mehul J Desai, David Dickerson, Amitabh Gulati, Dawood Sayed, Timothy R Deer","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S521788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) has evolved with various applications and durations of therapy. In recent years, extensive data has been developed on a 60-day treatment using a novel approach. Confusion exists on the use of a trial therapy, a permanent implant, and a 60-day duration treatment. The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) seeks to clarify the literature associated with this neuromodulation approach. A diverse group of experts was nominated to provide opinions and guidance based on evidence-graded assessment and clinical knowledge. This guidance is the first to specifically assess the clinical use of 60-day PNS and best medical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"3117-3139"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12206896/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consensus Guidelines from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience for the Use of 60-Day Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Therapy. A NEURON Living Guideline Project.\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Gill, Cody Tidwell, Jonathan M Hagedorn, Alexandra M Moreira, Marco Lawandy, Benjamin Boyett, Justin Schappell, Usman Latif, Scott Pritzlaff, Ioannis Skaribas, Hemant Kalia, Samir Sheth, Maricela Schnur, Sean Li, Denise Lester, Trevor Ellico, Ramana Naidu, David Russo, Christopher Massey, Einar Ottestad, Kevin Vorenkamp, Henry Vucetic, Matthew J Pingree, David Abejón, Mehul J Desai, David Dickerson, Amitabh Gulati, Dawood Sayed, Timothy R Deer\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JPR.S521788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) has evolved with various applications and durations of therapy. In recent years, extensive data has been developed on a 60-day treatment using a novel approach. Confusion exists on the use of a trial therapy, a permanent implant, and a 60-day duration treatment. The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) seeks to clarify the literature associated with this neuromodulation approach. A diverse group of experts was nominated to provide opinions and guidance based on evidence-graded assessment and clinical knowledge. This guidance is the first to specifically assess the clinical use of 60-day PNS and best medical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"3117-3139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12206896/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S521788\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S521788","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Consensus Guidelines from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience for the Use of 60-Day Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Therapy. A NEURON Living Guideline Project.
Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) has evolved with various applications and durations of therapy. In recent years, extensive data has been developed on a 60-day treatment using a novel approach. Confusion exists on the use of a trial therapy, a permanent implant, and a 60-day duration treatment. The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) seeks to clarify the literature associated with this neuromodulation approach. A diverse group of experts was nominated to provide opinions and guidance based on evidence-graded assessment and clinical knowledge. This guidance is the first to specifically assess the clinical use of 60-day PNS and best medical practice.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.