西马鲁肽2.4 mg对美国动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(SHINE-ASCVD)患者医疗资源利用和医疗费用的影响

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Medical Economics Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-12 DOI:10.1080/13696998.2025.2526282
Wojciech Michalak, Zhenxiang Zhao, Mads Faurby, Sara Alvarez, Angela Fitch
{"title":"西马鲁肽2.4 mg对美国动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(SHINE-ASCVD)患者医疗资源利用和医疗费用的影响","authors":"Wojciech Michalak, Zhenxiang Zhao, Mads Faurby, Sara Alvarez, Angela Fitch","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2025.2526282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Semaglutide 2.4 mg (Wegovy) has demonstrated improved outcomes in patients with overweight or obesity (ov/ob) and ASCVD, but its impact on medical costs and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To compare all-cause medical costs and HCRU among patients with ov/ob and ASCVD treated with semaglutide 2.4 mg versus semaglutide-untreated controls.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This observational cohort study utilized Komodo's Healthcare Map and included patients with ov/ob and ≥1 diagnosis of ASCVD during the baseline period with ≥12 months of insurance coverage before and after the index date. Patients in the semaglutide 2.4 mg cohort initiated treatment after 4 June 2021 and stayed adherent. Semaglutide-untreated controls were randomly selected and 1:4 propensity score matched based on baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, medical costs, and HCRU. Medical costs and HCRU were compared using generalized linear models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>770 semaglutide 2.4 mg-treated patients and 3,080 controls were included. In the year following treatment initiation, semaglutide 2.4 mg was associated with 22% lower mean medical costs versus controls (-$4,639 per patient per year [PPPY]; cost ratio = 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67, 0.89). This difference is mainly due to lower inpatient costs with semaglutide 2.4 mg, which were 65% lower than controls (-$3,593; cost ratio = 0.35 [95% CI 0.21, 0.49]), along with a 48% lower inpatient visit rate (0.08 vs. 0.15; rate ratio = 0.52 [95% CI 0.34, 0.70]).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Limitations inherent to retrospective claims analyses apply to this study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This real-world analysis shows significantly lower annual medical costs and HCRU with semaglutide 2.4 mg versus no semaglutide 2.4 mg treatment in patients with ov/ob and ASCVD. Improving outcomes with semaglutide 2.4 mg combined with lower costs and HCRU may help slow the growing burden of ASCVD in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"1075-1085"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of semaglutide 2.4 mg on healthcare resource utilization and medical costs in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in the United States (SHINE-ASCVD).\",\"authors\":\"Wojciech Michalak, Zhenxiang Zhao, Mads Faurby, Sara Alvarez, Angela Fitch\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13696998.2025.2526282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Semaglutide 2.4 mg (Wegovy) has demonstrated improved outcomes in patients with overweight or obesity (ov/ob) and ASCVD, but its impact on medical costs and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To compare all-cause medical costs and HCRU among patients with ov/ob and ASCVD treated with semaglutide 2.4 mg versus semaglutide-untreated controls.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This observational cohort study utilized Komodo's Healthcare Map and included patients with ov/ob and ≥1 diagnosis of ASCVD during the baseline period with ≥12 months of insurance coverage before and after the index date. Patients in the semaglutide 2.4 mg cohort initiated treatment after 4 June 2021 and stayed adherent. Semaglutide-untreated controls were randomly selected and 1:4 propensity score matched based on baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, medical costs, and HCRU. Medical costs and HCRU were compared using generalized linear models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>770 semaglutide 2.4 mg-treated patients and 3,080 controls were included. In the year following treatment initiation, semaglutide 2.4 mg was associated with 22% lower mean medical costs versus controls (-$4,639 per patient per year [PPPY]; cost ratio = 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67, 0.89). This difference is mainly due to lower inpatient costs with semaglutide 2.4 mg, which were 65% lower than controls (-$3,593; cost ratio = 0.35 [95% CI 0.21, 0.49]), along with a 48% lower inpatient visit rate (0.08 vs. 0.15; rate ratio = 0.52 [95% CI 0.34, 0.70]).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Limitations inherent to retrospective claims analyses apply to this study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This real-world analysis shows significantly lower annual medical costs and HCRU with semaglutide 2.4 mg versus no semaglutide 2.4 mg treatment in patients with ov/ob and ASCVD. Improving outcomes with semaglutide 2.4 mg combined with lower costs and HCRU may help slow the growing burden of ASCVD in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1075-1085\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2526282\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2526282","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)是发病率和死亡率的主要原因。Semaglutide 2.4 mg*已证明可改善超重或肥胖(ov/ob)和ASCVD患者的预后,但其对医疗成本和医疗资源利用(HCRU)的影响仍不清楚。目的:比较接受西马鲁肽2.4 mg治疗和未接受西马鲁肽治疗的ov/ob和ASCVD患者的全因医疗费用和HCRU。材料和方法:本观察性队列研究采用Komodo医疗保健地图,纳入了在基线期间ov/ob和≥1次ASCVD诊断的患者,在索引日期前后保险覆盖≥12个月。semaglutide 2.4 mg队列的患者在2021年6月4日之后开始治疗并保持坚持。随机选择未使用semaglutide的对照组,根据基线人口统计学、临床特征、医疗费用和HCRU匹配1:4倾向评分。采用广义线性模型对医疗费用和HCRU进行比较。结果:纳入770例接受西马鲁肽2.4 mg治疗的患者和3080例对照组。在治疗开始后的一年中,与对照组相比,semaglutide 2.4 mg与平均医疗费用降低22%相关(每位患者每年- 4,639美元[PPPY];成本比= 0.78,95%可信区间[CI] 0.67, 0.89])。这一差异的主要原因是,使用2.4 mg西马鲁肽的住院费用较低,比对照组低65%(- 3,593美元;成本比= 0.35 [95% CI 0.21, 0.49]),住院率降低48% (0.08 vs. 0.15;比率= 0.52 [95% CI 0.34, 0.70])。局限性:回顾性索赔分析固有的局限性适用于本研究。结论:这项现实世界的分析显示,在ov/ob和ASCVD患者中,使用2.4 mg的semaglutide与不使用2.4 mg的semaglutide相比,每年的医疗费用和HCRU显著降低。semaglutide 2.4 mg联合较低的成本和HCRU可能有助于减缓ASCVD在这一人群中日益增长的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of semaglutide 2.4 mg on healthcare resource utilization and medical costs in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in the United States (SHINE-ASCVD).

Background: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Semaglutide 2.4 mg (Wegovy) has demonstrated improved outcomes in patients with overweight or obesity (ov/ob) and ASCVD, but its impact on medical costs and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) remains unknown.

Aims: To compare all-cause medical costs and HCRU among patients with ov/ob and ASCVD treated with semaglutide 2.4 mg versus semaglutide-untreated controls.

Materials and methods: This observational cohort study utilized Komodo's Healthcare Map and included patients with ov/ob and ≥1 diagnosis of ASCVD during the baseline period with ≥12 months of insurance coverage before and after the index date. Patients in the semaglutide 2.4 mg cohort initiated treatment after 4 June 2021 and stayed adherent. Semaglutide-untreated controls were randomly selected and 1:4 propensity score matched based on baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, medical costs, and HCRU. Medical costs and HCRU were compared using generalized linear models.

Results: 770 semaglutide 2.4 mg-treated patients and 3,080 controls were included. In the year following treatment initiation, semaglutide 2.4 mg was associated with 22% lower mean medical costs versus controls (-$4,639 per patient per year [PPPY]; cost ratio = 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67, 0.89). This difference is mainly due to lower inpatient costs with semaglutide 2.4 mg, which were 65% lower than controls (-$3,593; cost ratio = 0.35 [95% CI 0.21, 0.49]), along with a 48% lower inpatient visit rate (0.08 vs. 0.15; rate ratio = 0.52 [95% CI 0.34, 0.70]).

Limitations: Limitations inherent to retrospective claims analyses apply to this study.

Conclusions: This real-world analysis shows significantly lower annual medical costs and HCRU with semaglutide 2.4 mg versus no semaglutide 2.4 mg treatment in patients with ov/ob and ASCVD. Improving outcomes with semaglutide 2.4 mg combined with lower costs and HCRU may help slow the growing burden of ASCVD in this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Economics
Journal of Medical Economics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication. Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信