Shengming Li, Tianjing Zhang, Jia He, Chen He, Fang Liu, Yan Yao, Xiaofei Li, Rutai Hui, Xiaohan Fan
{"title":"收缩压对运动测试反应的性别差异:现实世界的临床分析。","authors":"Shengming Li, Tianjing Zhang, Jia He, Chen He, Fang Liu, Yan Yao, Xiaofei Li, Rutai Hui, Xiaohan Fan","doi":"10.1038/s41371-025-01037-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The American Heart Association recommends sex-specific thresholds for defining exaggerated systolic blood pressure response to exercise (ESBPR), primarily based on data from young healthy populations. However, their applicability and the sex differences in systolic blood pressure (SBP) response to exercise in real-world clinical settings remain unclear. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 44 418 adults (40.6% female) with a mean age of 49, who underwent treadmill exercise testing at Fuwai Hospital from 2016-2022. ESBPR was defined as peak SBP during exercise ≥ 210 mmHg for males and ≥ 190 mmHg for females. Multivariate regression models stratified by sex were used to explore whether sex modifies age-related patterns in SBP response to exercise. ESBPR was over five times more prevalent in females than males (10.1 vs. 1.9%, P < 0.001). While the mean, 90th, and 95th percentiles of peak SBP were at least 12 mmHg higher in males than females in younger age groups (18-44), the gap narrowed to less than 4 mmHg in older age groups (≥45). Stratified multivariate analysis revealed that age was a strong predictor of ESBPR in females but not in males. Using age ≥ 51 as a proxy for menopause, females older than 51 had significantly higher odds of ESBPR compared to younger females (adjusted OR: 1.904, 95% CI: 1.683-2.155, P < 0.001). Our findings reveal that females and males display distinct age-related patterns in SBP response to exercise. The lower threshold for females may disproportionately classify postmenopausal females as abnormal.</p>","PeriodicalId":16070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex differences in systolic blood pressure response to exercise testing: a real-world clinical analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Shengming Li, Tianjing Zhang, Jia He, Chen He, Fang Liu, Yan Yao, Xiaofei Li, Rutai Hui, Xiaohan Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41371-025-01037-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The American Heart Association recommends sex-specific thresholds for defining exaggerated systolic blood pressure response to exercise (ESBPR), primarily based on data from young healthy populations. However, their applicability and the sex differences in systolic blood pressure (SBP) response to exercise in real-world clinical settings remain unclear. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 44 418 adults (40.6% female) with a mean age of 49, who underwent treadmill exercise testing at Fuwai Hospital from 2016-2022. ESBPR was defined as peak SBP during exercise ≥ 210 mmHg for males and ≥ 190 mmHg for females. Multivariate regression models stratified by sex were used to explore whether sex modifies age-related patterns in SBP response to exercise. ESBPR was over five times more prevalent in females than males (10.1 vs. 1.9%, P < 0.001). While the mean, 90th, and 95th percentiles of peak SBP were at least 12 mmHg higher in males than females in younger age groups (18-44), the gap narrowed to less than 4 mmHg in older age groups (≥45). Stratified multivariate analysis revealed that age was a strong predictor of ESBPR in females but not in males. Using age ≥ 51 as a proxy for menopause, females older than 51 had significantly higher odds of ESBPR compared to younger females (adjusted OR: 1.904, 95% CI: 1.683-2.155, P < 0.001). Our findings reveal that females and males display distinct age-related patterns in SBP response to exercise. The lower threshold for females may disproportionately classify postmenopausal females as abnormal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Hypertension\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-025-01037-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-025-01037-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sex differences in systolic blood pressure response to exercise testing: a real-world clinical analysis.
The American Heart Association recommends sex-specific thresholds for defining exaggerated systolic blood pressure response to exercise (ESBPR), primarily based on data from young healthy populations. However, their applicability and the sex differences in systolic blood pressure (SBP) response to exercise in real-world clinical settings remain unclear. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 44 418 adults (40.6% female) with a mean age of 49, who underwent treadmill exercise testing at Fuwai Hospital from 2016-2022. ESBPR was defined as peak SBP during exercise ≥ 210 mmHg for males and ≥ 190 mmHg for females. Multivariate regression models stratified by sex were used to explore whether sex modifies age-related patterns in SBP response to exercise. ESBPR was over five times more prevalent in females than males (10.1 vs. 1.9%, P < 0.001). While the mean, 90th, and 95th percentiles of peak SBP were at least 12 mmHg higher in males than females in younger age groups (18-44), the gap narrowed to less than 4 mmHg in older age groups (≥45). Stratified multivariate analysis revealed that age was a strong predictor of ESBPR in females but not in males. Using age ≥ 51 as a proxy for menopause, females older than 51 had significantly higher odds of ESBPR compared to younger females (adjusted OR: 1.904, 95% CI: 1.683-2.155, P < 0.001). Our findings reveal that females and males display distinct age-related patterns in SBP response to exercise. The lower threshold for females may disproportionately classify postmenopausal females as abnormal.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Human Hypertension is published monthly and is of interest to health care professionals who deal with hypertension (specialists, internists, primary care physicians) and public health workers. We believe that our patients benefit from robust scientific data that are based on well conducted clinical trials. We also believe that basic sciences are the foundations on which we build our knowledge of clinical conditions and their management. Towards this end, although we are primarily a clinical based journal, we also welcome suitable basic sciences studies that promote our understanding of human hypertension.
The journal aims to perform the dual role of increasing knowledge in the field of high blood pressure as well as improving the standard of care of patients. The editors will consider for publication all suitable papers dealing directly or indirectly with clinical aspects of hypertension, including but not limited to epidemiology, pathophysiology, therapeutics and basic sciences involving human subjects or tissues. We also consider papers from all specialties such as ophthalmology, cardiology, nephrology, obstetrics and stroke medicine that deal with the various aspects of hypertension and its complications.