Anna D Lee, Skyler K Palmer, Jacob B Hammond, YooJin Yoon, Nayun Lee, Elliot L H Le, Diego A Gomez, Christodoulos Kaoutzanis, Jason W Yu, Brooke French, Phuong D Nguyen, David W Mathes, David Y Khechoyan
{"title":"伴随面部骨折:对患者、患病率和骨折类型的全国评估。","authors":"Anna D Lee, Skyler K Palmer, Jacob B Hammond, YooJin Yoon, Nayun Lee, Elliot L H Le, Diego A Gomez, Christodoulos Kaoutzanis, Jason W Yu, Brooke French, Phuong D Nguyen, David W Mathes, David Y Khechoyan","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Facial fractures may present with one or more additional facial fractures and result in significant morbidity. The authors evaluated the prevalence of concomitant facial fractures within the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors retrospectively reviewed patients in PearlDiver, a national deidentified claims database from 2010 through 2020, who had concomitant facial fracture surgery identified by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes reported within 30 days of presentation. Fracture treatment interventions were further categorized by open reduction, open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), and closed reduction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 244,751 patients were identified in the database and included in the study. The average age was 39 years old, 45% were female, and 76% were commercially insured. The most common surgically treated fracture was nasal bone fracture with closed reduction (57%). A total of 32% of naso-ethmoidal (NOE) ORIFs had a concomitant malar fracture, whereas 2.5% of malar ORIFs were found to have a concurrent NOE. For Le Fort-type fractures, 28% of Le Fort I and 32% of Le Fort II ORIFs had a concomitant malar fracture. Similarly, 28%, 22%, and 30% of Le Fort I, II, and III ORIFs, respectively, had a concomitant orbital floor blow-out fracture. An estimated 20% of malar ORIFs had an orbital bone fracture, and 16% of all orbital bone ORIFs had a concomitant malar fracture.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Le Fort-type, malar, and orbital fractures that require ORIF will likely have a second concomitant facial fracture. Surgeons should exercise a high index of suspicion for co-occurring fractures in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concomitant Facial Fractures: A National Evaluation of Patients, Prevalence, and Fracture Patterns.\",\"authors\":\"Anna D Lee, Skyler K Palmer, Jacob B Hammond, YooJin Yoon, Nayun Lee, Elliot L H Le, Diego A Gomez, Christodoulos Kaoutzanis, Jason W Yu, Brooke French, Phuong D Nguyen, David W Mathes, David Y Khechoyan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Facial fractures may present with one or more additional facial fractures and result in significant morbidity. The authors evaluated the prevalence of concomitant facial fractures within the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors retrospectively reviewed patients in PearlDiver, a national deidentified claims database from 2010 through 2020, who had concomitant facial fracture surgery identified by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes reported within 30 days of presentation. Fracture treatment interventions were further categorized by open reduction, open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), and closed reduction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 244,751 patients were identified in the database and included in the study. The average age was 39 years old, 45% were female, and 76% were commercially insured. The most common surgically treated fracture was nasal bone fracture with closed reduction (57%). A total of 32% of naso-ethmoidal (NOE) ORIFs had a concomitant malar fracture, whereas 2.5% of malar ORIFs were found to have a concurrent NOE. For Le Fort-type fractures, 28% of Le Fort I and 32% of Le Fort II ORIFs had a concomitant malar fracture. Similarly, 28%, 22%, and 30% of Le Fort I, II, and III ORIFs, respectively, had a concomitant orbital floor blow-out fracture. An estimated 20% of malar ORIFs had an orbital bone fracture, and 16% of all orbital bone ORIFs had a concomitant malar fracture.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Le Fort-type, malar, and orbital fractures that require ORIF will likely have a second concomitant facial fracture. Surgeons should exercise a high index of suspicion for co-occurring fractures in these patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011594\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011594","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:面部骨折可能伴有一个或多个额外的面部骨折,并导致显著的发病率。作者评估了美国伴有面部骨折的患病率。方法:作者回顾性回顾了2010年至2020年在PearlDiver(一个国家未识别索赔数据库)中报告的30天内伴有面部骨折手术的患者,这些患者符合现行程序术语(CPT)规范。骨折治疗干预措施进一步分为切开复位、切开复位内固定(ORIF)和闭合复位。结果:共有244,751例患者在数据库中被识别并纳入研究。平均年龄39岁,45%为女性,76%为商业保险。最常见的手术治疗骨折是鼻骨骨折闭合复位(57%)。共有32%的鼻筛口(NOE)口内瘘合并颧骨折,而2.5%的颧口口内瘘并发NOE。对于Le Fort型骨折,28%的Le Fort I型骨折和32%的Le Fort II型骨折合并颧骨折。同样,Le Fort I、II和III型orif分别有28%、22%和30%合并眶底爆裂性骨折。据估计,20%的颧部ORIFs伴有眶骨骨折,16%的眶骨ORIFs伴有颧部骨折。结论:Le fort型、颧部和眶部骨折需要ORIF的患者可能会并发第二次面部骨折。外科医生对这些患者的合并骨折应高度警惕。
Concomitant Facial Fractures: A National Evaluation of Patients, Prevalence, and Fracture Patterns.
Background: Facial fractures may present with one or more additional facial fractures and result in significant morbidity. The authors evaluated the prevalence of concomitant facial fractures within the United States.
Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed patients in PearlDiver, a national deidentified claims database from 2010 through 2020, who had concomitant facial fracture surgery identified by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes reported within 30 days of presentation. Fracture treatment interventions were further categorized by open reduction, open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), and closed reduction.
Results: A total of 244,751 patients were identified in the database and included in the study. The average age was 39 years old, 45% were female, and 76% were commercially insured. The most common surgically treated fracture was nasal bone fracture with closed reduction (57%). A total of 32% of naso-ethmoidal (NOE) ORIFs had a concomitant malar fracture, whereas 2.5% of malar ORIFs were found to have a concurrent NOE. For Le Fort-type fractures, 28% of Le Fort I and 32% of Le Fort II ORIFs had a concomitant malar fracture. Similarly, 28%, 22%, and 30% of Le Fort I, II, and III ORIFs, respectively, had a concomitant orbital floor blow-out fracture. An estimated 20% of malar ORIFs had an orbital bone fracture, and 16% of all orbital bone ORIFs had a concomitant malar fracture.
Conclusion: Le Fort-type, malar, and orbital fractures that require ORIF will likely have a second concomitant facial fracture. Surgeons should exercise a high index of suspicion for co-occurring fractures in these patients.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.