Eloise W Stanton, Deja Nicholas, Andrew Humbert, Colleen M Ryan, Gretchen J Carrougher, Barclay T Stewart, Haig A Yenikomshian
{"title":"烧伤结果中全身表面积特征的可变性:一项烧伤模型系统研究。","authors":"Eloise W Stanton, Deja Nicholas, Andrew Humbert, Colleen M Ryan, Gretchen J Carrougher, Barclay T Stewart, Haig A Yenikomshian","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Total body surface area (TBSA) burned is critical for assessing burn extent and guiding acute treatment, but its role in predicting long-term outcomes remains underexplored. This study leverages the Burn Model Systems (BMS) database to evaluate TBSA's characterization and its predictive value for survivors' outcomes, aiming to propose standardized approaches for its use. Publications from the BMS database (1994-2024) were analyzed for TBSA characterization and its relationship to outcomes. Outcomes included patient-reported measures (e.g., quality of life, psychological well-being) and objective outcomes (e.g., physical recovery, complications). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize TBSA usage across studies and its influence on outcomes. Of 107 publications, 91 (85%) included TBSA data. Among these, 91% used TBSA as a continuous variable, 23% employed categorical methods, and 16% utilized both. Categorical TBSA stratification varied, with deciles (n = 6) and quintiles (n = 3) being most common, while others used inconsistent approaches. Approximately 32% of studies assessed TBSA's direct impact on outcomes such as physical and psychosocial recovery, return to work, and pain/itch. A quarter of studies included TBSA as a covariate without directly examining its predictive value. Of 32 papers reporting TBSA outcomes, 74.4% demonstrated significant impact on outcomes. TBSA is widely utilized but inconsistently characterized, with few studies directly assessing its role in long-term outcomes. Standardizing TBSA reporting could improve predictive accuracy, facilitate cross-study comparisons, and guide evidence-based care for burn survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variability of Characterization of Total Body Surface Area in Burn Outcomes: A Burn Model System Study.\",\"authors\":\"Eloise W Stanton, Deja Nicholas, Andrew Humbert, Colleen M Ryan, Gretchen J Carrougher, Barclay T Stewart, Haig A Yenikomshian\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbcr/iraf114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Total body surface area (TBSA) burned is critical for assessing burn extent and guiding acute treatment, but its role in predicting long-term outcomes remains underexplored. This study leverages the Burn Model Systems (BMS) database to evaluate TBSA's characterization and its predictive value for survivors' outcomes, aiming to propose standardized approaches for its use. Publications from the BMS database (1994-2024) were analyzed for TBSA characterization and its relationship to outcomes. Outcomes included patient-reported measures (e.g., quality of life, psychological well-being) and objective outcomes (e.g., physical recovery, complications). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize TBSA usage across studies and its influence on outcomes. Of 107 publications, 91 (85%) included TBSA data. Among these, 91% used TBSA as a continuous variable, 23% employed categorical methods, and 16% utilized both. Categorical TBSA stratification varied, with deciles (n = 6) and quintiles (n = 3) being most common, while others used inconsistent approaches. Approximately 32% of studies assessed TBSA's direct impact on outcomes such as physical and psychosocial recovery, return to work, and pain/itch. A quarter of studies included TBSA as a covariate without directly examining its predictive value. Of 32 papers reporting TBSA outcomes, 74.4% demonstrated significant impact on outcomes. TBSA is widely utilized but inconsistently characterized, with few studies directly assessing its role in long-term outcomes. Standardizing TBSA reporting could improve predictive accuracy, facilitate cross-study comparisons, and guide evidence-based care for burn survivors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf114\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf114","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Variability of Characterization of Total Body Surface Area in Burn Outcomes: A Burn Model System Study.
Total body surface area (TBSA) burned is critical for assessing burn extent and guiding acute treatment, but its role in predicting long-term outcomes remains underexplored. This study leverages the Burn Model Systems (BMS) database to evaluate TBSA's characterization and its predictive value for survivors' outcomes, aiming to propose standardized approaches for its use. Publications from the BMS database (1994-2024) were analyzed for TBSA characterization and its relationship to outcomes. Outcomes included patient-reported measures (e.g., quality of life, psychological well-being) and objective outcomes (e.g., physical recovery, complications). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize TBSA usage across studies and its influence on outcomes. Of 107 publications, 91 (85%) included TBSA data. Among these, 91% used TBSA as a continuous variable, 23% employed categorical methods, and 16% utilized both. Categorical TBSA stratification varied, with deciles (n = 6) and quintiles (n = 3) being most common, while others used inconsistent approaches. Approximately 32% of studies assessed TBSA's direct impact on outcomes such as physical and psychosocial recovery, return to work, and pain/itch. A quarter of studies included TBSA as a covariate without directly examining its predictive value. Of 32 papers reporting TBSA outcomes, 74.4% demonstrated significant impact on outcomes. TBSA is widely utilized but inconsistently characterized, with few studies directly assessing its role in long-term outcomes. Standardizing TBSA reporting could improve predictive accuracy, facilitate cross-study comparisons, and guide evidence-based care for burn survivors.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.