Salma Ramadan , Laurel Tay , Harlene Kaur , Thomas Parrish , Salma Abdelmoteleb , Jayant Totlani , Emile Tadros , Drew Hirsch , Nathalie Murphy , Ashley Meyer , Macie Miller , Mia Pasini , Aasim Naqvi , Angela Liu , Romana Dymkoski , Sabrina Renteria , Rebecca Hedrick , Itai Danovitch , Robert Pechnick , Waguih William IsHak
{"title":"双相情感障碍:已批准的精神药物(2008-2024)和正在进行的第三期药物的系统回顾。","authors":"Salma Ramadan , Laurel Tay , Harlene Kaur , Thomas Parrish , Salma Abdelmoteleb , Jayant Totlani , Emile Tadros , Drew Hirsch , Nathalie Murphy , Ashley Meyer , Macie Miller , Mia Pasini , Aasim Naqvi , Angela Liu , Romana Dymkoski , Sabrina Renteria , Rebecca Hedrick , Itai Danovitch , Robert Pechnick , Waguih William IsHak","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2025.119778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This systematic review evaluates psychiatric medications for bipolar disorder (BP) approved by the U.S. FDA between 2008 and 2024, alongside investigational agents in advanced clinical development, in addition to medications with exploratory evidence. It categorizes these treatments by clinical relevance, mechanism of action, efficacy, dosing, adverse effects, and guideline and real-world use.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, FDALabel, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for studies published between 2008 and 2024, using keywords including “bipolar” AND “psychopharm*” OR “medic*” OR “pharm*.” Two reviewers independently assessed the resulting publications, resolving any discrepancies through consensus to finalize the studies for inclusion in this review. Key findings from the selected full-text articles were extracted to compile data for the review tables. We also utilized practice guidelines for BP from the US, Canada, the UK, and Australia/New Zealand.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>BP medications were categorized into three tiers: (1) FDA-approved and guideline-endorsed, (2) FDA-approved, with emerging clinical use, and (3) Phase 3 agents. We described eight Tier 1 and eight Tier 2 medications that received FDA approval from 2008 to 2024, seven that are actively in pipeline Phase 3 clinical trials, and six more medications with exploratory evidence.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Advances in pharmacologic treatment for bipolar disorder over the past 16 years reflect a shift towards individualized, mechanism-based care. Our tiered framework offers clinicians and researchers a structured approach to evaluate treatment maturity and real-world applicability. Continued research and careful interpretation of the evolving pipeline and medications with exploratory evidence are essential to optimize long-term management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":"390 ","pages":"Article 119778"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bipolar disorder: Systematic review of approved psychiatric medications (2008–2024) and pipeline Phase-3 medications\",\"authors\":\"Salma Ramadan , Laurel Tay , Harlene Kaur , Thomas Parrish , Salma Abdelmoteleb , Jayant Totlani , Emile Tadros , Drew Hirsch , Nathalie Murphy , Ashley Meyer , Macie Miller , Mia Pasini , Aasim Naqvi , Angela Liu , Romana Dymkoski , Sabrina Renteria , Rebecca Hedrick , Itai Danovitch , Robert Pechnick , Waguih William IsHak\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jad.2025.119778\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This systematic review evaluates psychiatric medications for bipolar disorder (BP) approved by the U.S. FDA between 2008 and 2024, alongside investigational agents in advanced clinical development, in addition to medications with exploratory evidence. It categorizes these treatments by clinical relevance, mechanism of action, efficacy, dosing, adverse effects, and guideline and real-world use.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, FDALabel, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for studies published between 2008 and 2024, using keywords including “bipolar” AND “psychopharm*” OR “medic*” OR “pharm*.” Two reviewers independently assessed the resulting publications, resolving any discrepancies through consensus to finalize the studies for inclusion in this review. Key findings from the selected full-text articles were extracted to compile data for the review tables. We also utilized practice guidelines for BP from the US, Canada, the UK, and Australia/New Zealand.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>BP medications were categorized into three tiers: (1) FDA-approved and guideline-endorsed, (2) FDA-approved, with emerging clinical use, and (3) Phase 3 agents. We described eight Tier 1 and eight Tier 2 medications that received FDA approval from 2008 to 2024, seven that are actively in pipeline Phase 3 clinical trials, and six more medications with exploratory evidence.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Advances in pharmacologic treatment for bipolar disorder over the past 16 years reflect a shift towards individualized, mechanism-based care. Our tiered framework offers clinicians and researchers a structured approach to evaluate treatment maturity and real-world applicability. Continued research and careful interpretation of the evolving pipeline and medications with exploratory evidence are essential to optimize long-term management.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of affective disorders\",\"volume\":\"390 \",\"pages\":\"Article 119778\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of affective disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032725012200\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032725012200","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bipolar disorder: Systematic review of approved psychiatric medications (2008–2024) and pipeline Phase-3 medications
Objective
This systematic review evaluates psychiatric medications for bipolar disorder (BP) approved by the U.S. FDA between 2008 and 2024, alongside investigational agents in advanced clinical development, in addition to medications with exploratory evidence. It categorizes these treatments by clinical relevance, mechanism of action, efficacy, dosing, adverse effects, and guideline and real-world use.
Methods
We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, FDALabel, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for studies published between 2008 and 2024, using keywords including “bipolar” AND “psychopharm*” OR “medic*” OR “pharm*.” Two reviewers independently assessed the resulting publications, resolving any discrepancies through consensus to finalize the studies for inclusion in this review. Key findings from the selected full-text articles were extracted to compile data for the review tables. We also utilized practice guidelines for BP from the US, Canada, the UK, and Australia/New Zealand.
Results
BP medications were categorized into three tiers: (1) FDA-approved and guideline-endorsed, (2) FDA-approved, with emerging clinical use, and (3) Phase 3 agents. We described eight Tier 1 and eight Tier 2 medications that received FDA approval from 2008 to 2024, seven that are actively in pipeline Phase 3 clinical trials, and six more medications with exploratory evidence.
Conclusion
Advances in pharmacologic treatment for bipolar disorder over the past 16 years reflect a shift towards individualized, mechanism-based care. Our tiered framework offers clinicians and researchers a structured approach to evaluate treatment maturity and real-world applicability. Continued research and careful interpretation of the evolving pipeline and medications with exploratory evidence are essential to optimize long-term management.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.