品牌头孢呋辛钠与国产头孢呋辛钠抗葡萄球菌和大肠埃希菌体外药动学和药效学比较。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Drug Design, Development and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-06-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/DDDT.S511271
Mengjiao Du, Tingting Sun, Xueting Wang, Xiaohui Chi, Yonghong Xiao
{"title":"品牌头孢呋辛钠与国产头孢呋辛钠抗葡萄球菌和大肠埃希菌体外药动学和药效学比较。","authors":"Mengjiao Du, Tingting Sun, Xueting Wang, Xiaohui Chi, Yonghong Xiao","doi":"10.2147/DDDT.S511271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the in-vitro antibacterial effects of branded and its locally produced cefuroxime sodium against <i>Staphylococcus</i> ATCC29213, clinical strains of methicillin-sensitive <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MSSA) 164342 and methicillin-sensitive coagulase-negative <i>staphylococci</i> (MSCNS) 117933, and <i>Escherichia coli</i> ATCC25922, and to provide a reference for their clinical use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An in-vitro antibacterial susceptibility test, time-kill curve and pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) modeling was used in the comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of the two types of cefuroxime sodium were identical against four bacterial strains; both types of cefuroxime sodium had MICs of 0.5 μg/mL, 8 μg/mL, 0.5 μg/mL, and 0.25 μg/mL against ATCC 29213, ATCC 25922, M164342 and MSCNS117933, respectively. There were no significant differences in the time-kill curves of the two forms against the four strains at three concentrations. At drug concentrations of 2×MIC and 4×MIC, the bacterial count of all the strains decreased from 6 log CFU/mL to around 4 log CFU/mL. The bactericidal efficacies of the two agents were generally similar in the pharmacokinetics model of simulated intravenous drug administration of 1 g q8h. Only the PD parameter of bactericidal rate (KR) for ATCC 29213 and the area difference between the drug bactericidal curve and the bacterial growth control curve (I<sub>E</sub>) for ATCC25922 were statistically different. The KR and I<sub>E</sub> of the locally produced form were 0.73±0.10 logCFU·h/mL and 83.73±12.69 logCFU·h/mL, respectively, while the KR and I<sub>E</sub> of the branded form were 1.19±0.07 logCFU·h/mL and 104.02±16.28 logCFU·h/mL, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The in-vitro antibacterial effect of locally produced cefuroxime sodium against <i>Staphylococci</i> and <i>E. coli</i> is comparable to that of branded cefuroxime sodium.</p>","PeriodicalId":11290,"journal":{"name":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","volume":"19 ","pages":"5461-5470"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12206899/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of in-vitro Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Branded and Its Locally Produced Cefuroxime Sodium Against <i>Staphylococcus</i> and <i>Escherichia Escherichia coli</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Mengjiao Du, Tingting Sun, Xueting Wang, Xiaohui Chi, Yonghong Xiao\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/DDDT.S511271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the in-vitro antibacterial effects of branded and its locally produced cefuroxime sodium against <i>Staphylococcus</i> ATCC29213, clinical strains of methicillin-sensitive <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MSSA) 164342 and methicillin-sensitive coagulase-negative <i>staphylococci</i> (MSCNS) 117933, and <i>Escherichia coli</i> ATCC25922, and to provide a reference for their clinical use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An in-vitro antibacterial susceptibility test, time-kill curve and pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) modeling was used in the comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of the two types of cefuroxime sodium were identical against four bacterial strains; both types of cefuroxime sodium had MICs of 0.5 μg/mL, 8 μg/mL, 0.5 μg/mL, and 0.25 μg/mL against ATCC 29213, ATCC 25922, M164342 and MSCNS117933, respectively. There were no significant differences in the time-kill curves of the two forms against the four strains at three concentrations. At drug concentrations of 2×MIC and 4×MIC, the bacterial count of all the strains decreased from 6 log CFU/mL to around 4 log CFU/mL. The bactericidal efficacies of the two agents were generally similar in the pharmacokinetics model of simulated intravenous drug administration of 1 g q8h. Only the PD parameter of bactericidal rate (KR) for ATCC 29213 and the area difference between the drug bactericidal curve and the bacterial growth control curve (I<sub>E</sub>) for ATCC25922 were statistically different. The KR and I<sub>E</sub> of the locally produced form were 0.73±0.10 logCFU·h/mL and 83.73±12.69 logCFU·h/mL, respectively, while the KR and I<sub>E</sub> of the branded form were 1.19±0.07 logCFU·h/mL and 104.02±16.28 logCFU·h/mL, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The in-vitro antibacterial effect of locally produced cefuroxime sodium against <i>Staphylococci</i> and <i>E. coli</i> is comparable to that of branded cefuroxime sodium.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug Design, Development and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"5461-5470\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12206899/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug Design, Development and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S511271\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S511271","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较品牌药与国产头孢呋辛钠对葡萄球菌ATCC29213、甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA) 164342、甲氧西林敏感凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(MSCNS) 117933、大肠杆菌ATCC25922的体外抑菌效果,为其临床应用提供参考。方法:采用体外药敏试验、时间杀伤曲线和药代动力学(PK/PD)模型进行比较。结果:两种头孢呋辛钠对4株细菌的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)相同;头孢呋辛钠对ATCC 29213、ATCC 25922、M164342和MSCNS117933的mic值分别为0.5、8、0.5和0.25 μg/mL。三种浓度下,两种菌株对四种菌株的时间杀伤曲线无显著差异。在药物浓度为2×MIC和4×MIC时,所有菌株的细菌计数从6 log CFU/mL降至4 log CFU/mL左右。在1 g q8h模拟静脉给药的药代动力学模型中,两种药物的杀菌效果基本相似。只有atcc29213的杀菌率(KR) PD参数和ATCC25922的药物杀菌曲线与细菌生长控制曲线(IE)的面积差有统计学差异。当地生产形式的KR和IE分别为0.73±0.10 logCFU·h/mL和83.73±12.69 logCFU·h/mL,而品牌形式的KR和IE分别为1.19±0.07 logCFU·h/mL和104.02±16.28 logCFU·h/mL。结论:国产头孢呋辛钠对葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌的体外抑菌效果与品牌头孢呋辛钠相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison of in-vitro Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Branded and Its Locally Produced Cefuroxime Sodium Against Staphylococcus and Escherichia Escherichia coli.

Purpose: To compare the in-vitro antibacterial effects of branded and its locally produced cefuroxime sodium against Staphylococcus ATCC29213, clinical strains of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) 164342 and methicillin-sensitive coagulase-negative staphylococci (MSCNS) 117933, and Escherichia coli ATCC25922, and to provide a reference for their clinical use.

Methods: An in-vitro antibacterial susceptibility test, time-kill curve and pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) modeling was used in the comparison.

Results: The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of the two types of cefuroxime sodium were identical against four bacterial strains; both types of cefuroxime sodium had MICs of 0.5 μg/mL, 8 μg/mL, 0.5 μg/mL, and 0.25 μg/mL against ATCC 29213, ATCC 25922, M164342 and MSCNS117933, respectively. There were no significant differences in the time-kill curves of the two forms against the four strains at three concentrations. At drug concentrations of 2×MIC and 4×MIC, the bacterial count of all the strains decreased from 6 log CFU/mL to around 4 log CFU/mL. The bactericidal efficacies of the two agents were generally similar in the pharmacokinetics model of simulated intravenous drug administration of 1 g q8h. Only the PD parameter of bactericidal rate (KR) for ATCC 29213 and the area difference between the drug bactericidal curve and the bacterial growth control curve (IE) for ATCC25922 were statistically different. The KR and IE of the locally produced form were 0.73±0.10 logCFU·h/mL and 83.73±12.69 logCFU·h/mL, respectively, while the KR and IE of the branded form were 1.19±0.07 logCFU·h/mL and 104.02±16.28 logCFU·h/mL, respectively.

Conclusion: The in-vitro antibacterial effect of locally produced cefuroxime sodium against Staphylococci and E. coli is comparable to that of branded cefuroxime sodium.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Design, Development and Therapy
Drug Design, Development and Therapy CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
382
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drug Design, Development and Therapy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that spans the spectrum of drug design, discovery and development through to clinical applications. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of high-quality original research, reviews, expert opinions, commentary and clinical studies in all therapeutic areas. Specific topics covered by the journal include: Drug target identification and validation Phenotypic screening and target deconvolution Biochemical analyses of drug targets and their pathways New methods or relevant applications in molecular/drug design and computer-aided drug discovery* Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel biologically active compounds (including diagnostics or chemical probes) Structural or molecular biological studies elucidating molecular recognition processes Fragment-based drug discovery Pharmaceutical/red biotechnology Isolation, structural characterization, (bio)synthesis, bioengineering and pharmacological evaluation of natural products** Distribution, pharmacokinetics and metabolic transformations of drugs or biologically active compounds in drug development Drug delivery and formulation (design and characterization of dosage forms, release mechanisms and in vivo testing) Preclinical development studies Translational animal models Mechanisms of action and signalling pathways Toxicology Gene therapy, cell therapy and immunotherapy Personalized medicine and pharmacogenomics Clinical drug evaluation Patient safety and sustained use of medicines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信