中国痴呆症患者的家庭照顾者概况:对量身定制干预发展的影响

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Fang Chen, Shihua Pan, Jing Mei, Xiaomin Ding, Huimin Sun
{"title":"中国痴呆症患者的家庭照顾者概况:对量身定制干预发展的影响","authors":"Fang Chen, Shihua Pan, Jing Mei, Xiaomin Ding, Huimin Sun","doi":"10.1080/07317115.2025.2526629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify psychological profiles of Chinese dementia caregivers and examine how socio-demographic factors influence high-risk profiles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, 209 primary family caregivers were assessed using validated scales measuring caregiver stress, negative emotions, and cognitive/affective empathy. Latent profile analysis classified caregivers based on these measures, and multinomial logistic regression identified predictors of profile group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four profiles emerged: (1) Rational (7%: low stress/negative emotions, high cognitive empathy); (2) Adaptive (36%: moderate stress, balanced empathy); (3) Substantial Stress - High Affective Empathy (45%: near-clinical stress (CPSS = 29.59), high affective empathy); and (4) High Stress - Low Cognitive Empathy (12%: extreme stress (CPSS = 37.24), lowest cognitive empathy). Lack of caregiving assistance increased odds of high-risk profiles (OR = 6.09 and 4.84, <i>p</i> <.05). Low income strongly predicted membership in High Stress-Low Cognitive Empathy group (OR = 8.03, <i>p</i> = .006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Over half of the caregivers (57%) fall into high-risk profiles characterized by dominance affective empathy, with systemic factors (e.g. lack of assistance and low income) exacerbating vulnerability. Cultural norms (e.g. filial piety) may contribute to these psychological patterns.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Targeted cognitive empathy training for high-affective-empathy profile, income-based subsidies and respite care and culturally adapted interventions (e.g. reframing filial responsibility as shared duty) are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":10376,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Profiles of Family Caregivers for Patients with Dementia in China: Implications for Tailored Intervention Development.\",\"authors\":\"Fang Chen, Shihua Pan, Jing Mei, Xiaomin Ding, Huimin Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07317115.2025.2526629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify psychological profiles of Chinese dementia caregivers and examine how socio-demographic factors influence high-risk profiles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, 209 primary family caregivers were assessed using validated scales measuring caregiver stress, negative emotions, and cognitive/affective empathy. Latent profile analysis classified caregivers based on these measures, and multinomial logistic regression identified predictors of profile group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four profiles emerged: (1) Rational (7%: low stress/negative emotions, high cognitive empathy); (2) Adaptive (36%: moderate stress, balanced empathy); (3) Substantial Stress - High Affective Empathy (45%: near-clinical stress (CPSS = 29.59), high affective empathy); and (4) High Stress - Low Cognitive Empathy (12%: extreme stress (CPSS = 37.24), lowest cognitive empathy). Lack of caregiving assistance increased odds of high-risk profiles (OR = 6.09 and 4.84, <i>p</i> <.05). Low income strongly predicted membership in High Stress-Low Cognitive Empathy group (OR = 8.03, <i>p</i> = .006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Over half of the caregivers (57%) fall into high-risk profiles characterized by dominance affective empathy, with systemic factors (e.g. lack of assistance and low income) exacerbating vulnerability. Cultural norms (e.g. filial piety) may contribute to these psychological patterns.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Targeted cognitive empathy training for high-affective-empathy profile, income-based subsidies and respite care and culturally adapted interventions (e.g. reframing filial responsibility as shared duty) are recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Gerontologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Gerontologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2025.2526629\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2025.2526629","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定中国痴呆护理者的心理特征,并研究社会人口因素如何影响高危特征。方法:在本横断面研究中,对209名主要家庭照顾者进行了评估,采用验证的量表测量照顾者压力、负面情绪和认知/情感共情。基于这些指标的潜在特征分析对照顾者进行分类,并通过多项逻辑回归确定特征组的预测因子。结果显示:(1)理性(7%:低压力/负性情绪,高认知共情);(2)适应性(36%:压力适中,共情平衡);(3)实质压力-高情感共情(45%:近临床压力(CPSS = 29.59),高情感共情);(4)高压力-低认知共情(12%:极端压力(CPSS = 37.24),最低认知共情)。缺乏护理协助增加了高危人群的患病几率(OR = 6.09和4.84,p = 0.006)。结论:超过一半(57%)的照护者属于以主导情感共情为特征的高危人群,系统性因素(如缺乏援助和低收入)加剧了脆弱性。文化规范(如孝道)可能对这些心理模式有影响。临床意义:推荐针对高情感共情的认知共情训练、基于收入的补贴和临时护理以及文化适应性干预(如将孝顺责任重新定义为共同责任)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Profiles of Family Caregivers for Patients with Dementia in China: Implications for Tailored Intervention Development.

Objectives: To identify psychological profiles of Chinese dementia caregivers and examine how socio-demographic factors influence high-risk profiles.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 209 primary family caregivers were assessed using validated scales measuring caregiver stress, negative emotions, and cognitive/affective empathy. Latent profile analysis classified caregivers based on these measures, and multinomial logistic regression identified predictors of profile group.

Results: Four profiles emerged: (1) Rational (7%: low stress/negative emotions, high cognitive empathy); (2) Adaptive (36%: moderate stress, balanced empathy); (3) Substantial Stress - High Affective Empathy (45%: near-clinical stress (CPSS = 29.59), high affective empathy); and (4) High Stress - Low Cognitive Empathy (12%: extreme stress (CPSS = 37.24), lowest cognitive empathy). Lack of caregiving assistance increased odds of high-risk profiles (OR = 6.09 and 4.84, p <.05). Low income strongly predicted membership in High Stress-Low Cognitive Empathy group (OR = 8.03, p = .006).

Conclusions: Over half of the caregivers (57%) fall into high-risk profiles characterized by dominance affective empathy, with systemic factors (e.g. lack of assistance and low income) exacerbating vulnerability. Cultural norms (e.g. filial piety) may contribute to these psychological patterns.

Clinical implications: Targeted cognitive empathy training for high-affective-empathy profile, income-based subsidies and respite care and culturally adapted interventions (e.g. reframing filial responsibility as shared duty) are recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Gerontologist
Clinical Gerontologist GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Gerontologist presents original research, reviews, and clinical comments relevant to the needs of behavioral health professionals and all practitioners who work with older adults. Published in cooperation with Psychologists in Long Term Care, the journal is designed for psychologists, physicians, nurses, social workers, counselors (family, pastoral, and vocational), and other health professionals who address behavioral health concerns found in later life, including: -adjustments to changing roles- issues related to diversity and aging- family caregiving- spirituality- cognitive and psychosocial assessment- depression, anxiety, and PTSD- Alzheimer’s disease and other neurocognitive disorders- long term care- behavioral medicine in aging- rehabilitation and education for older adults. Each issue provides insightful articles on current topics. Submissions are peer reviewed by content experts and selected for both scholarship and relevance to the practitioner to ensure that the articles are among the best in the field. Authors report original research and conceptual reviews. A unique column in Clinical Gerontologist is “Clinical Comments." This section features brief observations and specific suggestions from practitioners which avoid elaborate research designs or long reference lists. This section is a unique opportunity for you to learn about the valuable clinical work of your peers in a short, concise format.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信