John M. Powers, Stephen G. Weller, Ann K. Sakai, Diane R. Campbell
{"title":"共用一个飞蛾传粉媒介的两种雪兰属植物的人工杂交花的气味。","authors":"John M. Powers, Stephen G. Weller, Ann K. Sakai, Diane R. Campbell","doi":"10.1002/ajb2.70065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Premise</h3>\n \n <p>In flowering plants, pollinators' ability to recognize chemical displays of hybrids may erode reproductive barriers. Hybrids may produce novel or altered floral scent blends that are unattractive, or scents similar to either parent that remain attractive and promote backcrossing. We characterized the floral scent of hybrids of sympatric species with a shared pollinator and tested whether scent is sufficient for pollinator attraction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Floral volatiles of artificial F<sub>1</sub> hybrids between Hawaiian <i>Schiedea kaalae</i> and <i>S. hookeri</i> (Caryophyllaceae) were characterized by dynamic headspace sampling and GC-MS. Behavioral choice tests with the native moth <i>Pseudoschrankia brevipalpis</i> measured the effect of adding <i>S. kaalae</i> scent (with flowers bagged to remove visual cues) to inflorescences of relatively unattractive wind-pollinated relatives (<i>S. kealiae</i> and <i>S. globosa</i>) from the same island.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Most hybrids produced a combination of the distinct sets of floral volatiles from each parent at rates of emission that often differed from the expectation under completely additive inheritance. Floral scent did not depend on cross direction, and no novel compounds were detected in hybrids. <i>Pseudoschrankia brevipalpis</i> preferred inflorescences of <i>S. globosa</i> and <i>S. kealiae</i> that were augmented with the scent of hidden <i>S. kaalae</i> flowers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Intermediate hybrid floral scent blends could potentially attract moths if they do not rely on precise compound ratios. Moth attraction to the floral scent of <i>S. kaalae</i> flowers indicates that moths can discriminate the floral scent of this species against a background of volatiles and visual cues from wind-pollinated relatives, showing the importance of scent variation in this genus.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7691,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Botany","volume":"112 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajb2.70065","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Floral scent of artificial hybrids between two Schiedea species that share a moth pollinator\",\"authors\":\"John M. Powers, Stephen G. Weller, Ann K. Sakai, Diane R. Campbell\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajb2.70065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Premise</h3>\\n \\n <p>In flowering plants, pollinators' ability to recognize chemical displays of hybrids may erode reproductive barriers. Hybrids may produce novel or altered floral scent blends that are unattractive, or scents similar to either parent that remain attractive and promote backcrossing. We characterized the floral scent of hybrids of sympatric species with a shared pollinator and tested whether scent is sufficient for pollinator attraction.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Floral volatiles of artificial F<sub>1</sub> hybrids between Hawaiian <i>Schiedea kaalae</i> and <i>S. hookeri</i> (Caryophyllaceae) were characterized by dynamic headspace sampling and GC-MS. Behavioral choice tests with the native moth <i>Pseudoschrankia brevipalpis</i> measured the effect of adding <i>S. kaalae</i> scent (with flowers bagged to remove visual cues) to inflorescences of relatively unattractive wind-pollinated relatives (<i>S. kealiae</i> and <i>S. globosa</i>) from the same island.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Most hybrids produced a combination of the distinct sets of floral volatiles from each parent at rates of emission that often differed from the expectation under completely additive inheritance. Floral scent did not depend on cross direction, and no novel compounds were detected in hybrids. <i>Pseudoschrankia brevipalpis</i> preferred inflorescences of <i>S. globosa</i> and <i>S. kealiae</i> that were augmented with the scent of hidden <i>S. kaalae</i> flowers.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Intermediate hybrid floral scent blends could potentially attract moths if they do not rely on precise compound ratios. Moth attraction to the floral scent of <i>S. kaalae</i> flowers indicates that moths can discriminate the floral scent of this species against a background of volatiles and visual cues from wind-pollinated relatives, showing the importance of scent variation in this genus.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Botany\",\"volume\":\"112 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajb2.70065\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Botany\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajb2.70065\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajb2.70065","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Floral scent of artificial hybrids between two Schiedea species that share a moth pollinator
Premise
In flowering plants, pollinators' ability to recognize chemical displays of hybrids may erode reproductive barriers. Hybrids may produce novel or altered floral scent blends that are unattractive, or scents similar to either parent that remain attractive and promote backcrossing. We characterized the floral scent of hybrids of sympatric species with a shared pollinator and tested whether scent is sufficient for pollinator attraction.
Methods
Floral volatiles of artificial F1 hybrids between Hawaiian Schiedea kaalae and S. hookeri (Caryophyllaceae) were characterized by dynamic headspace sampling and GC-MS. Behavioral choice tests with the native moth Pseudoschrankia brevipalpis measured the effect of adding S. kaalae scent (with flowers bagged to remove visual cues) to inflorescences of relatively unattractive wind-pollinated relatives (S. kealiae and S. globosa) from the same island.
Results
Most hybrids produced a combination of the distinct sets of floral volatiles from each parent at rates of emission that often differed from the expectation under completely additive inheritance. Floral scent did not depend on cross direction, and no novel compounds were detected in hybrids. Pseudoschrankia brevipalpis preferred inflorescences of S. globosa and S. kealiae that were augmented with the scent of hidden S. kaalae flowers.
Conclusions
Intermediate hybrid floral scent blends could potentially attract moths if they do not rely on precise compound ratios. Moth attraction to the floral scent of S. kaalae flowers indicates that moths can discriminate the floral scent of this species against a background of volatiles and visual cues from wind-pollinated relatives, showing the importance of scent variation in this genus.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Botany (AJB), the flagship journal of the Botanical Society of America (BSA), publishes peer-reviewed, innovative, significant research of interest to a wide audience of plant scientists in all areas of plant biology (structure, function, development, diversity, genetics, evolution, systematics), all levels of organization (molecular to ecosystem), and all plant groups and allied organisms (cyanobacteria, algae, fungi, and lichens). AJB requires authors to frame their research questions and discuss their results in terms of major questions of plant biology. In general, papers that are too narrowly focused, purely descriptive, natural history, broad surveys, or that contain only preliminary data will not be considered.