Francesco Stabile, Sebastian Jaramillo, Bezalel Hakkeem, Giang Son Arrighini, Stefano Cangemi, Daniela Di Lisi, Egle Corrado, Alfredo Ruggero Galassi, Giuseppina Novo
{"title":"肥厚性心肌病患者心房颤动导管消融:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Francesco Stabile, Sebastian Jaramillo, Bezalel Hakkeem, Giang Son Arrighini, Stefano Cangemi, Daniela Di Lisi, Egle Corrado, Alfredo Ruggero Galassi, Giuseppina Novo","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.06.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently complicates hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Catheter ablation (CA) has emerged as an effective treatment modality; however, its efficacy compared to medical therapy in HCM patients remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of CA compared with medical therapy on hard prognostic outcomes in patients with HCM and AF. PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing CA with medical therapy alone in HCM patients with documented AF. We Included studies that reported at least 1 clinical outcome of interest over a minimum 5-year follow-up period: all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, heart failure hospitalizations and stroke. A random-effects model was applied, and heterogeneity was assessed by I² statistics. We analyzed 4 studies comprising a total of 570 patients, 316 (55%) of whom underwent CA. CA significantly reduced heart failure hospitalizations compared to medical therapy alone (RR 0.37; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.87; p = 0.02). However, CA showed no statistically significant effect on all-cause mortality (RR 0.68; 95% CI 0.41 to 1.11; p = 0.12), cardiovascular death (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.35 to 1.25; p = 0.20), or stroke incidence (RR 0.29; 95% CI 0.03 to 2.61; p = 0.27). In conclusion, in patients with HCM and AF, CA is associated with a significant reduction in heart failure hospitalizations compared to medical therapy alone, without a significant impact on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, or stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Stabile, Sebastian Jaramillo, Bezalel Hakkeem, Giang Son Arrighini, Stefano Cangemi, Daniela Di Lisi, Egle Corrado, Alfredo Ruggero Galassi, Giuseppina Novo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.06.026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently complicates hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Catheter ablation (CA) has emerged as an effective treatment modality; however, its efficacy compared to medical therapy in HCM patients remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of CA compared with medical therapy on hard prognostic outcomes in patients with HCM and AF. PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing CA with medical therapy alone in HCM patients with documented AF. We Included studies that reported at least 1 clinical outcome of interest over a minimum 5-year follow-up period: all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, heart failure hospitalizations and stroke. A random-effects model was applied, and heterogeneity was assessed by I² statistics. We analyzed 4 studies comprising a total of 570 patients, 316 (55%) of whom underwent CA. CA significantly reduced heart failure hospitalizations compared to medical therapy alone (RR 0.37; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.87; p = 0.02). However, CA showed no statistically significant effect on all-cause mortality (RR 0.68; 95% CI 0.41 to 1.11; p = 0.12), cardiovascular death (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.35 to 1.25; p = 0.20), or stroke incidence (RR 0.29; 95% CI 0.03 to 2.61; p = 0.27). In conclusion, in patients with HCM and AF, CA is associated with a significant reduction in heart failure hospitalizations compared to medical therapy alone, without a significant impact on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, or stroke.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.06.026\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.06.026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
心房颤动(AF)经常并发肥厚性心肌病(HCM),并与显著的发病率和死亡率相关。导管消融(CA)已成为一种有效的治疗方式;然而,与药物治疗相比,其在HCM患者中的疗效尚不清楚。我们进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估与药物治疗相比CA对HCM和房颤患者硬预后的影响。PubMed、Scopus和Cochrane数据库系统地检索了比较CA与单独药物治疗HCM合并房颤患者的随机对照试验和观察性研究。我们纳入了在至少5年随访期间报告了至少一项临床结果的研究:全因死亡率、心血管死亡、心力衰竭住院和中风。采用随机效应模型,采用I²统计量评价异质性。我们分析了四项研究,共包括570例患者,其中316例(55%)接受了CA。与单纯药物治疗相比,CA显著降低了心力衰竭住院率(RR 0.37;95% ci 0.16-0.87;p = 0.02)。然而,CA对全因死亡率无统计学显著影响(RR 0.68;95% ci 0.41-1.11;p=0.12),心血管死亡(RR 0.66;95% ci 0.35-1.25;p=0.20)或卒中发生率(RR 0.29;95% ci 0.03-2.61;p = 0.27)。总之,在HCM和房颤患者中,与单独药物治疗相比,CA与心力衰竭住院率显著降低相关,对全因死亡率、心血管死亡或卒中无显著影响。
Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently complicates hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Catheter ablation (CA) has emerged as an effective treatment modality; however, its efficacy compared to medical therapy in HCM patients remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of CA compared with medical therapy on hard prognostic outcomes in patients with HCM and AF. PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing CA with medical therapy alone in HCM patients with documented AF. We Included studies that reported at least 1 clinical outcome of interest over a minimum 5-year follow-up period: all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, heart failure hospitalizations and stroke. A random-effects model was applied, and heterogeneity was assessed by I² statistics. We analyzed 4 studies comprising a total of 570 patients, 316 (55%) of whom underwent CA. CA significantly reduced heart failure hospitalizations compared to medical therapy alone (RR 0.37; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.87; p = 0.02). However, CA showed no statistically significant effect on all-cause mortality (RR 0.68; 95% CI 0.41 to 1.11; p = 0.12), cardiovascular death (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.35 to 1.25; p = 0.20), or stroke incidence (RR 0.29; 95% CI 0.03 to 2.61; p = 0.27). In conclusion, in patients with HCM and AF, CA is associated with a significant reduction in heart failure hospitalizations compared to medical therapy alone, without a significant impact on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, or stroke.
期刊介绍:
Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.