阈下微脉冲激光治疗预防糖尿病黄斑水肿的疗效:初步研究。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Barbara Sabal, Edward Wylęgała, Sławomir Teper
{"title":"阈下微脉冲激光治疗预防糖尿病黄斑水肿的疗效:初步研究。","authors":"Barbara Sabal, Edward Wylęgała, Sławomir Teper","doi":"10.1111/aos.17548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the use of subthreshold micropulse laser (SMPL) in the prevention and management of mild diabetic macular oedema (DME).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomised and sham-controlled study included 159 eyes (123 patients) with diabetic retinopathy, central retinal thickness (CRT) ≤ 325 μm, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≥ 80 ETDRS letters. The participants were assigned to either SMPL treatment (n = 103) or sham therapy (n = 56). Ophthalmic evaluations were performed at baseline (T1), 3 months (T2) and 12 months (T3) to assess BCVA and optical coherent tomography (OCT) parameters, including CRT, macular thickness (MT), macular volume (MV), and hyperreflective spots (HRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the SMPL group, BCVA improved after 3 months (T2 > T1; p = 0.002); MT decreased after 12 months (T2, T1 > T3; p < 0.001); MV decreased after 12 months (T2, T1 > T3; p < 0.001); HRS count decreased after 3 and 12 months (T1 > T2, T3, p < 0.001). The decrease in CRT after 3 months was greater in the SMPL group (p = 0.003). The need for rescue therapy was lower in the SMPL group (9.7% vs. 19.6%, p = 0.007). BCVA, CRT, MV, MT and HRS remained stable in the sham group, while microaneurysms count was stable in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SMPL is safe and effective for the prophylaxis of mild DME, as it reduces MT and MV while keeping BCVA stable. The decreased need for rescue anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy suggests that it may delay or reduce intravitreal injections.</p>","PeriodicalId":6915,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response to subthreshold micropulse laser treatment in the prophylaxis of diabetic macular oedema: A preliminary study.\",\"authors\":\"Barbara Sabal, Edward Wylęgała, Sławomir Teper\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aos.17548\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the use of subthreshold micropulse laser (SMPL) in the prevention and management of mild diabetic macular oedema (DME).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomised and sham-controlled study included 159 eyes (123 patients) with diabetic retinopathy, central retinal thickness (CRT) ≤ 325 μm, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≥ 80 ETDRS letters. The participants were assigned to either SMPL treatment (n = 103) or sham therapy (n = 56). Ophthalmic evaluations were performed at baseline (T1), 3 months (T2) and 12 months (T3) to assess BCVA and optical coherent tomography (OCT) parameters, including CRT, macular thickness (MT), macular volume (MV), and hyperreflective spots (HRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the SMPL group, BCVA improved after 3 months (T2 > T1; p = 0.002); MT decreased after 12 months (T2, T1 > T3; p < 0.001); MV decreased after 12 months (T2, T1 > T3; p < 0.001); HRS count decreased after 3 and 12 months (T1 > T2, T3, p < 0.001). The decrease in CRT after 3 months was greater in the SMPL group (p = 0.003). The need for rescue therapy was lower in the SMPL group (9.7% vs. 19.6%, p = 0.007). BCVA, CRT, MV, MT and HRS remained stable in the sham group, while microaneurysms count was stable in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SMPL is safe and effective for the prophylaxis of mild DME, as it reduces MT and MV while keeping BCVA stable. The decreased need for rescue anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy suggests that it may delay or reduce intravitreal injections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Ophthalmologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Ophthalmologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.17548\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.17548","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨阈下微脉冲激光(SMPL)在轻度糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)预防和治疗中的应用。方法:这项前瞻性、随机、假对照研究纳入159只眼(123例)糖尿病视网膜病变患者,中央视网膜厚度(CRT)≤325 μm,最佳矫正视力(BCVA)≥80 ETDRS字母。参与者被分配到SMPL治疗(n = 103)或假治疗(n = 56)。在基线(T1)、3个月(T2)和12个月(T3)进行眼科评估,评估BCVA和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)参数,包括CRT、黄斑厚度(MT)、黄斑体积(MV)和高反射斑(HRS)。结果:SMPL组3个月后BCVA改善(T2 bb0 T1;p = 0.002);12个月后MT下降(T2, T1 > T3;p T3;结论:SMPL预防轻度二甲醚安全有效,可在保持BCVA稳定的同时降低MT和MV。救急性抗血管内皮生长因子治疗的需求减少表明它可以延迟或减少玻璃体内注射。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Response to subthreshold micropulse laser treatment in the prophylaxis of diabetic macular oedema: A preliminary study.

Purpose: To evaluate the use of subthreshold micropulse laser (SMPL) in the prevention and management of mild diabetic macular oedema (DME).

Methods: This prospective, randomised and sham-controlled study included 159 eyes (123 patients) with diabetic retinopathy, central retinal thickness (CRT) ≤ 325 μm, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≥ 80 ETDRS letters. The participants were assigned to either SMPL treatment (n = 103) or sham therapy (n = 56). Ophthalmic evaluations were performed at baseline (T1), 3 months (T2) and 12 months (T3) to assess BCVA and optical coherent tomography (OCT) parameters, including CRT, macular thickness (MT), macular volume (MV), and hyperreflective spots (HRS).

Results: In the SMPL group, BCVA improved after 3 months (T2 > T1; p = 0.002); MT decreased after 12 months (T2, T1 > T3; p < 0.001); MV decreased after 12 months (T2, T1 > T3; p < 0.001); HRS count decreased after 3 and 12 months (T1 > T2, T3, p < 0.001). The decrease in CRT after 3 months was greater in the SMPL group (p = 0.003). The need for rescue therapy was lower in the SMPL group (9.7% vs. 19.6%, p = 0.007). BCVA, CRT, MV, MT and HRS remained stable in the sham group, while microaneurysms count was stable in both groups.

Conclusion: SMPL is safe and effective for the prophylaxis of mild DME, as it reduces MT and MV while keeping BCVA stable. The decreased need for rescue anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy suggests that it may delay or reduce intravitreal injections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Ophthalmologica
Acta Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
433
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Acta Ophthalmologica is published on behalf of the Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation and is the official scientific publication of the following societies: The Danish Ophthalmological Society, The Finnish Ophthalmological Society, The Icelandic Ophthalmological Society, The Norwegian Ophthalmological Society and The Swedish Ophthalmological Society, and also the European Association for Vision and Eye Research (EVER). Acta Ophthalmologica publishes clinical and experimental original articles, reviews, editorials, educational photo essays (Diagnosis and Therapy in Ophthalmology), case reports and case series, letters to the editor and doctoral theses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信