Adam Reguli, Samira Dowlatshah, Frederik André Hansen, Petra Štěrbová-Kovaříková, Stig Pedersen-Bjergaard
{"title":"全血中药物分析的体积吸收微进样和导电小瓶电膜萃取。","authors":"Adam Reguli, Samira Dowlatshah, Frederik André Hansen, Petra Štěrbová-Kovaříková, Stig Pedersen-Bjergaard","doi":"10.1016/j.talanta.2025.128523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) enables accurate collection of low blood volumes, independent of hematocrit. Electromembrane extraction (EME) is a sustainable sample clean-up technique; however, its wider applicability to extract analytes directly from VAMS tips remains unexplored. This study aimed to evaluate applicability of the first commercially available conductive vial EME device (with 2-nitrophenyl octyl ether as liquid membrane) for isolating 41 basic pharmaceuticals (log P 2-6) from 10 μL of blood on VAMS tips. The following extraction parameters were optimized: donor solution composition and volume, conductive vials size, applied voltage, extraction time and agitation speed. It was found that: 1/large conductive vials (600 μL) and 300 μL of donor solution provide higher process efficiency and reproducibility compared to smaller vials (200 μL) or larger donor solution volumes; 2/methanol in donor solution improve reproducibility and 3/sonication of VAMS tips in donor solution within a conductive vial prior to extraction enhances process efficiency. The EME protocol, followed by UHPLC-MS/MS analysis, was evaluated for process efficiency, linearity (1-1000 ng/mL), precision, and accuracy. Eleven analytes met most of the predefined acceptance criteria: process efficiencies 34.9-65.8 %, linearity (R<sup>2</sup>) 0.9933-0.9995, accuracy 85.9-111.1 % and precision 1.4-13.3 % RSD. The extraction was not impacted by hematocrit variation. EME demonstrated superior reproducibility and reduced matrix effects when compared to conventional VAMS tips treatment. This study confirms the reliability of a commercial conductive vial EME device for isolating basic pharmaceuticals from whole blood on VAMS tips, highlighting its potential for routine bioanalytical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":435,"journal":{"name":"Talanta","volume":"296 ","pages":"128523"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Volumetric absorptive microsampling and conductive vial electromembrane extraction for the analysis of pharmaceuticals in whole blood.\",\"authors\":\"Adam Reguli, Samira Dowlatshah, Frederik André Hansen, Petra Štěrbová-Kovaříková, Stig Pedersen-Bjergaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.talanta.2025.128523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) enables accurate collection of low blood volumes, independent of hematocrit. Electromembrane extraction (EME) is a sustainable sample clean-up technique; however, its wider applicability to extract analytes directly from VAMS tips remains unexplored. This study aimed to evaluate applicability of the first commercially available conductive vial EME device (with 2-nitrophenyl octyl ether as liquid membrane) for isolating 41 basic pharmaceuticals (log P 2-6) from 10 μL of blood on VAMS tips. The following extraction parameters were optimized: donor solution composition and volume, conductive vials size, applied voltage, extraction time and agitation speed. It was found that: 1/large conductive vials (600 μL) and 300 μL of donor solution provide higher process efficiency and reproducibility compared to smaller vials (200 μL) or larger donor solution volumes; 2/methanol in donor solution improve reproducibility and 3/sonication of VAMS tips in donor solution within a conductive vial prior to extraction enhances process efficiency. The EME protocol, followed by UHPLC-MS/MS analysis, was evaluated for process efficiency, linearity (1-1000 ng/mL), precision, and accuracy. Eleven analytes met most of the predefined acceptance criteria: process efficiencies 34.9-65.8 %, linearity (R<sup>2</sup>) 0.9933-0.9995, accuracy 85.9-111.1 % and precision 1.4-13.3 % RSD. The extraction was not impacted by hematocrit variation. EME demonstrated superior reproducibility and reduced matrix effects when compared to conventional VAMS tips treatment. This study confirms the reliability of a commercial conductive vial EME device for isolating basic pharmaceuticals from whole blood on VAMS tips, highlighting its potential for routine bioanalytical applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Talanta\",\"volume\":\"296 \",\"pages\":\"128523\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Talanta\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2025.128523\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Talanta","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2025.128523","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Volumetric absorptive microsampling and conductive vial electromembrane extraction for the analysis of pharmaceuticals in whole blood.
Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) enables accurate collection of low blood volumes, independent of hematocrit. Electromembrane extraction (EME) is a sustainable sample clean-up technique; however, its wider applicability to extract analytes directly from VAMS tips remains unexplored. This study aimed to evaluate applicability of the first commercially available conductive vial EME device (with 2-nitrophenyl octyl ether as liquid membrane) for isolating 41 basic pharmaceuticals (log P 2-6) from 10 μL of blood on VAMS tips. The following extraction parameters were optimized: donor solution composition and volume, conductive vials size, applied voltage, extraction time and agitation speed. It was found that: 1/large conductive vials (600 μL) and 300 μL of donor solution provide higher process efficiency and reproducibility compared to smaller vials (200 μL) or larger donor solution volumes; 2/methanol in donor solution improve reproducibility and 3/sonication of VAMS tips in donor solution within a conductive vial prior to extraction enhances process efficiency. The EME protocol, followed by UHPLC-MS/MS analysis, was evaluated for process efficiency, linearity (1-1000 ng/mL), precision, and accuracy. Eleven analytes met most of the predefined acceptance criteria: process efficiencies 34.9-65.8 %, linearity (R2) 0.9933-0.9995, accuracy 85.9-111.1 % and precision 1.4-13.3 % RSD. The extraction was not impacted by hematocrit variation. EME demonstrated superior reproducibility and reduced matrix effects when compared to conventional VAMS tips treatment. This study confirms the reliability of a commercial conductive vial EME device for isolating basic pharmaceuticals from whole blood on VAMS tips, highlighting its potential for routine bioanalytical applications.
期刊介绍:
Talanta provides a forum for the publication of original research papers, short communications, and critical reviews in all branches of pure and applied analytical chemistry. Papers are evaluated based on established guidelines, including the fundamental nature of the study, scientific novelty, substantial improvement or advantage over existing technology or methods, and demonstrated analytical applicability. Original research papers on fundamental studies, and on novel sensor and instrumentation developments, are encouraged. Novel or improved applications in areas such as clinical and biological chemistry, environmental analysis, geochemistry, materials science and engineering, and analytical platforms for omics development are welcome.
Analytical performance of methods should be determined, including interference and matrix effects, and methods should be validated by comparison with a standard method, or analysis of a certified reference material. Simple spiking recoveries may not be sufficient. The developed method should especially comprise information on selectivity, sensitivity, detection limits, accuracy, and reliability. However, applying official validation or robustness studies to a routine method or technique does not necessarily constitute novelty. Proper statistical treatment of the data should be provided. Relevant literature should be cited, including related publications by the authors, and authors should discuss how their proposed methodology compares with previously reported methods.