热安全边际和叶峰值温度预测不同植物物种对实验热浪的脆弱性。

IF 6 1区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Diana Cox, Renée M Marchin, David S Ellsworth, Agnieszka Wujeska-Klause, Alessandro Ossola, Kristine Y Crous, Michelle R Leishman, Paul D Rymer, Mark G Tjoelker
{"title":"热安全边际和叶峰值温度预测不同植物物种对实验热浪的脆弱性。","authors":"Diana Cox, Renée M Marchin, David S Ellsworth, Agnieszka Wujeska-Klause, Alessandro Ossola, Kristine Y Crous, Michelle R Leishman, Paul D Rymer, Mark G Tjoelker","doi":"10.1111/pce.70041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extreme heat can push plants beyond their thermal safety margin (TSM) if maximum leaf temperature (T<sub>leaf_max</sub>) exceeds leaf critical temperature (T<sub>crit</sub>). The TSM is potentially useful for assessing heat vulnerability across species but needs further validation, so we exposed 50 tree/shrub species in controlled glasshouses to a 6-day heatwave (peak air temperature = 41°C). Many species increased their mean T<sub>crit</sub> during the heatwave (42%), with ΔT<sub>crit</sub> ranging from +1°C to 4°C, but other species did not acclimate or were impaired by heat stress (58%). Species T<sub>leaf_max</sub> explained ~55% of the variation in species T<sub>crit</sub> and was a key correlate of the plasticity of T<sub>crit</sub> among species. Species with high ΔT<sub>crit</sub> also had higher ΔT<sub>leaf_max</sub>, with leaves being 7°‒12°C hotter during the heatwave than under baseline conditions. Both T<sub>leaf_max</sub> and TSMs were correlated with heatwave damage across diverse species from contrasting climate zones. Species differences in TSMs were stable across measurement temperatures, correctly identified the most vulnerable species, and were strongly associated with T<sub>leaf_max</sub>. Our results suggest that (1) T<sub>leaf_max</sub> alone is more informative than T<sub>crit</sub> for ranking species heat tolerance, and (2) species vulnerability to heatwaves is most reliably assessed by using TSMs that integrate T<sub>leaf_max</sub> with T<sub>crit</sub> across species.</p>","PeriodicalId":222,"journal":{"name":"Plant, Cell & Environment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thermal Safety Margins and Peak Leaf Temperatures Predict Vulnerability of Diverse Plant Species to an Experimental Heatwave.\",\"authors\":\"Diana Cox, Renée M Marchin, David S Ellsworth, Agnieszka Wujeska-Klause, Alessandro Ossola, Kristine Y Crous, Michelle R Leishman, Paul D Rymer, Mark G Tjoelker\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pce.70041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Extreme heat can push plants beyond their thermal safety margin (TSM) if maximum leaf temperature (T<sub>leaf_max</sub>) exceeds leaf critical temperature (T<sub>crit</sub>). The TSM is potentially useful for assessing heat vulnerability across species but needs further validation, so we exposed 50 tree/shrub species in controlled glasshouses to a 6-day heatwave (peak air temperature = 41°C). Many species increased their mean T<sub>crit</sub> during the heatwave (42%), with ΔT<sub>crit</sub> ranging from +1°C to 4°C, but other species did not acclimate or were impaired by heat stress (58%). Species T<sub>leaf_max</sub> explained ~55% of the variation in species T<sub>crit</sub> and was a key correlate of the plasticity of T<sub>crit</sub> among species. Species with high ΔT<sub>crit</sub> also had higher ΔT<sub>leaf_max</sub>, with leaves being 7°‒12°C hotter during the heatwave than under baseline conditions. Both T<sub>leaf_max</sub> and TSMs were correlated with heatwave damage across diverse species from contrasting climate zones. Species differences in TSMs were stable across measurement temperatures, correctly identified the most vulnerable species, and were strongly associated with T<sub>leaf_max</sub>. Our results suggest that (1) T<sub>leaf_max</sub> alone is more informative than T<sub>crit</sub> for ranking species heat tolerance, and (2) species vulnerability to heatwaves is most reliably assessed by using TSMs that integrate T<sub>leaf_max</sub> with T<sub>crit</sub> across species.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant, Cell & Environment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant, Cell & Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"2\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.70041\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant, Cell & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"2","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.70041","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当叶片最高温度(Tleaf_max)超过叶片临界温度(Tcrit)时,极端高温会使植物超出其热安全边际(TSM)。TSM对评估不同物种的热脆弱性可能有用,但需要进一步验证,因此我们将50种乔灌木物种暴露在受控温室中6天的热浪中(最高空气温度= 41°C)。许多物种在热浪期间增加了它们的平均温度(42%),ΔTcrit在+1°C到4°C之间,但其他物种没有适应或受到热应激的损害(58%)。物种Tleaf_max解释了物种Tcrit变异的55%,是物种间Tcrit可塑性的关键相关因子。ΔTcrit较高的物种的ΔTleaf_max也较高,在热浪期间叶片温度比基线条件下高7°-12°C。不同气候带不同物种间的Tleaf_max和TSMs均与热浪灾害相关。TSMs的物种差异在不同的测量温度下是稳定的,正确地识别了最脆弱的物种,并且与Tleaf_max密切相关。结果表明:(1)单独使用Tleaf_max对物种耐热性排序的信息量比Tcrit更大;(2)将Tleaf_max与Tcrit结合使用的tsm对物种对热浪的脆弱性评价最可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thermal Safety Margins and Peak Leaf Temperatures Predict Vulnerability of Diverse Plant Species to an Experimental Heatwave.

Extreme heat can push plants beyond their thermal safety margin (TSM) if maximum leaf temperature (Tleaf_max) exceeds leaf critical temperature (Tcrit). The TSM is potentially useful for assessing heat vulnerability across species but needs further validation, so we exposed 50 tree/shrub species in controlled glasshouses to a 6-day heatwave (peak air temperature = 41°C). Many species increased their mean Tcrit during the heatwave (42%), with ΔTcrit ranging from +1°C to 4°C, but other species did not acclimate or were impaired by heat stress (58%). Species Tleaf_max explained ~55% of the variation in species Tcrit and was a key correlate of the plasticity of Tcrit among species. Species with high ΔTcrit also had higher ΔTleaf_max, with leaves being 7°‒12°C hotter during the heatwave than under baseline conditions. Both Tleaf_max and TSMs were correlated with heatwave damage across diverse species from contrasting climate zones. Species differences in TSMs were stable across measurement temperatures, correctly identified the most vulnerable species, and were strongly associated with Tleaf_max. Our results suggest that (1) Tleaf_max alone is more informative than Tcrit for ranking species heat tolerance, and (2) species vulnerability to heatwaves is most reliably assessed by using TSMs that integrate Tleaf_max with Tcrit across species.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plant, Cell & Environment
Plant, Cell & Environment 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
4.10%
发文量
253
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Plant, Cell & Environment is a premier plant science journal, offering valuable insights into plant responses to their environment. Committed to publishing high-quality theoretical and experimental research, the journal covers a broad spectrum of factors, spanning from molecular to community levels. Researchers exploring various aspects of plant biology, physiology, and ecology contribute to the journal's comprehensive understanding of plant-environment interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信