个体、团体、家庭和联合治疗形式对自杀的比较效果:一项meta分析

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Nikki Lyka van Eijk, Renske Gilissen, Daan Creemers, Lizanne J. S. Schweren, Wouter van Ballegooijen
{"title":"个体、团体、家庭和联合治疗形式对自杀的比较效果:一项meta分析","authors":"Nikki Lyka van Eijk,&nbsp;Renske Gilissen,&nbsp;Daan Creemers,&nbsp;Lizanne J. S. Schweren,&nbsp;Wouter van Ballegooijen","doi":"10.1002/cpp.70112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Through carefully choosing psychotherapeutic interventions based on treatment characteristics, we may increase the relatively small effect sizes for suicidal outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of different psychotherapy formats in reducing suicidal ideation and attempts, including individual, group and family-based therapies, as well as combined modalities involving individual and group or individual and family interventions. We conducted a meta-analysis after systematically searching databases for randomised controlled trials up to April 1, 2024. Included studies targeted any mental health issue, were delivered in any setting, compared with any control group, and reported on suicidal ideation or attempts. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two researchers, and a mixed-effects model was used for data synthesis. One hundred and seventy-two studies were eligible, totalling 198 comparisons with a total of 22,440 participants. Individual therapy significantly reduced suicidal ideation (<i>g</i> = −0.33, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>k</i> = 72 comparisons), as did group therapy (<i>g</i> = −0.39, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>k</i> = 27 comparisons). For reducing suicide attempts, individual therapy (RR = 0.75, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>k</i> = 63 comparisons), and notably, combinations of individual with group (RR = 0.42, <i>p</i> = 0.010, <i>k</i> = 7 comparisons) and individual with family-based therapy (RR = 0.59, <i>p</i> = 0.041, <i>k</i> = 8 comparisons) were effective. Subgroup analysis showed that combined therapies were associated with larger effect sizes compared to single modalities in reducing suicide attempts (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). This meta-analysis highlights that combined psychotherapy approaches, integrating individual sessions with group or family sessions, yields significantly higher effect sizes, reducing the risk of suicide attempts by 50%. These findings support the adoption of combined therapeutic strategies in clinical settings to effectively address suicidality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Summary</h3>\n \n <div>\n \n <ul>\n \n \n <li>Individual or group therapy is effective for reducing suicidal ideation. Family therapy seems less effective than other formats.</li>\n \n \n <li>Individual therapy, or combining individual therapy with group therapy or family therapy, is effective for preventing suicide attempts.</li>\n \n \n <li>A combination of individual therapy with group or family therapy seems more effective at preventing suicide attempts than other formats.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"32 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.70112","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Effectiveness of Individual, Group, Family and Combined Therapy Formats on Suicidality: A Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Nikki Lyka van Eijk,&nbsp;Renske Gilissen,&nbsp;Daan Creemers,&nbsp;Lizanne J. S. Schweren,&nbsp;Wouter van Ballegooijen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpp.70112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>Through carefully choosing psychotherapeutic interventions based on treatment characteristics, we may increase the relatively small effect sizes for suicidal outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of different psychotherapy formats in reducing suicidal ideation and attempts, including individual, group and family-based therapies, as well as combined modalities involving individual and group or individual and family interventions. We conducted a meta-analysis after systematically searching databases for randomised controlled trials up to April 1, 2024. Included studies targeted any mental health issue, were delivered in any setting, compared with any control group, and reported on suicidal ideation or attempts. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two researchers, and a mixed-effects model was used for data synthesis. One hundred and seventy-two studies were eligible, totalling 198 comparisons with a total of 22,440 participants. Individual therapy significantly reduced suicidal ideation (<i>g</i> = −0.33, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>k</i> = 72 comparisons), as did group therapy (<i>g</i> = −0.39, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>k</i> = 27 comparisons). For reducing suicide attempts, individual therapy (RR = 0.75, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>k</i> = 63 comparisons), and notably, combinations of individual with group (RR = 0.42, <i>p</i> = 0.010, <i>k</i> = 7 comparisons) and individual with family-based therapy (RR = 0.59, <i>p</i> = 0.041, <i>k</i> = 8 comparisons) were effective. Subgroup analysis showed that combined therapies were associated with larger effect sizes compared to single modalities in reducing suicide attempts (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). This meta-analysis highlights that combined psychotherapy approaches, integrating individual sessions with group or family sessions, yields significantly higher effect sizes, reducing the risk of suicide attempts by 50%. These findings support the adoption of combined therapeutic strategies in clinical settings to effectively address suicidality.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Summary</h3>\\n \\n <div>\\n \\n <ul>\\n \\n \\n <li>Individual or group therapy is effective for reducing suicidal ideation. Family therapy seems less effective than other formats.</li>\\n \\n \\n <li>Individual therapy, or combining individual therapy with group therapy or family therapy, is effective for preventing suicide attempts.</li>\\n \\n \\n <li>A combination of individual therapy with group or family therapy seems more effective at preventing suicide attempts than other formats.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\"32 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.70112\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70112\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70112","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过仔细选择基于治疗特点的心理治疗干预措施,我们可能会增加自杀结果的相对较小的效应大小。本研究旨在评估不同心理治疗形式在减少自杀意念和企图方面的效果,包括个人、团体和家庭治疗,以及涉及个人和团体或个人和家庭干预的联合模式。在系统检索数据库中随机对照试验后,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,截止到2024年4月1日。包括针对任何心理健康问题的研究,在任何环境下进行,与任何对照组进行比较,并报告自杀意念或企图。数据提取和质量评估由两位研究者独立完成,采用混合效应模型进行数据合成。172项研究符合条件,共有198项比较,共有22,440名参与者。个体治疗显著降低自杀意念(g = - 0.33, p < 0.001, k = 72比较),团体治疗也显著降低自杀意念(g = - 0.39, p < 0.001, k = 27比较)。对于减少自杀企图,个体治疗(RR = 0.75, p < 0.001, k = 63比较),值得注意的是,个体与群体联合治疗(RR = 0.42, p = 0.010, k = 7比较)和个体与家庭联合治疗(RR = 0.59, p = 0.041, k = 8比较)是有效的。亚组分析显示,与单一治疗方式相比,联合治疗在减少自杀企图方面具有更大的效应(p < 0.001)。这项荟萃分析强调,结合心理治疗方法,将个人治疗与团体或家庭治疗结合起来,效果显著提高,将自杀企图的风险降低了50%。这些发现支持在临床环境中采用联合治疗策略来有效地解决自杀问题。个人或团体治疗对于减少自杀意念是有效的。家庭治疗似乎不如其他形式有效。个体治疗,或将个体治疗与团体治疗或家庭治疗相结合,对预防自杀企图是有效的。个人治疗与团体或家庭治疗相结合似乎比其他形式更有效地预防自杀企图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative Effectiveness of Individual, Group, Family and Combined Therapy Formats on Suicidality: A Meta-Analysis

Comparative Effectiveness of Individual, Group, Family and Combined Therapy Formats on Suicidality: A Meta-Analysis

Through carefully choosing psychotherapeutic interventions based on treatment characteristics, we may increase the relatively small effect sizes for suicidal outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of different psychotherapy formats in reducing suicidal ideation and attempts, including individual, group and family-based therapies, as well as combined modalities involving individual and group or individual and family interventions. We conducted a meta-analysis after systematically searching databases for randomised controlled trials up to April 1, 2024. Included studies targeted any mental health issue, were delivered in any setting, compared with any control group, and reported on suicidal ideation or attempts. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two researchers, and a mixed-effects model was used for data synthesis. One hundred and seventy-two studies were eligible, totalling 198 comparisons with a total of 22,440 participants. Individual therapy significantly reduced suicidal ideation (g = −0.33, p < 0.001, k = 72 comparisons), as did group therapy (g = −0.39, p < 0.001, k = 27 comparisons). For reducing suicide attempts, individual therapy (RR = 0.75, p < 0.001, k = 63 comparisons), and notably, combinations of individual with group (RR = 0.42, p = 0.010, k = 7 comparisons) and individual with family-based therapy (RR = 0.59, p = 0.041, k = 8 comparisons) were effective. Subgroup analysis showed that combined therapies were associated with larger effect sizes compared to single modalities in reducing suicide attempts (p < 0.001). This meta-analysis highlights that combined psychotherapy approaches, integrating individual sessions with group or family sessions, yields significantly higher effect sizes, reducing the risk of suicide attempts by 50%. These findings support the adoption of combined therapeutic strategies in clinical settings to effectively address suicidality.

Summary

  • Individual or group therapy is effective for reducing suicidal ideation. Family therapy seems less effective than other formats.
  • Individual therapy, or combining individual therapy with group therapy or family therapy, is effective for preventing suicide attempts.
  • A combination of individual therapy with group or family therapy seems more effective at preventing suicide attempts than other formats.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信