用于优化翼型形状的强化学习代理的比较分析

IF 1.7 4区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Harsh H. Sawant, Rahul Gujar, Neeta Mandhare, M. J. Sable, Prashant K. Ambadekar, S. H. Gawande
{"title":"用于优化翼型形状的强化学习代理的比较分析","authors":"Harsh H. Sawant,&nbsp;Rahul Gujar,&nbsp;Neeta Mandhare,&nbsp;M. J. Sable,&nbsp;Prashant K. Ambadekar,&nbsp;S. H. Gawande","doi":"10.1002/fld.5395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This work investigates the optimization of airfoil shapes using various reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms, including Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG), Twin Delayed Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (TD3), and Trust Region Policy Optimization (TRPO). The primary objective is to enhance the aerodynamic performance of airfoils by maximizing lift forces across different angles of attack (AoA). The study compares the optimized airfoils against the standard NACA 2412 airfoil. The DDPG-optimized airfoil demonstrated superior performance at lower and moderate AoAs, while the TRPO-optimized airfoil excelled at higher AoAs. In contrast, the TD3-optimized airfoil consistently underperformed. The results indicate that RL algorithms, particularly DDPG and TRPO, can effectively improve airfoil designs, offering substantial benefits in lift generation. This paper underscores the potential of RL techniques in aerodynamic shape optimization, presenting significant implications for aerospace and related industries.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50348,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids","volume":"97 8","pages":"1142-1156"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Reinforcement Learning Agents for Optimizing Airfoil Shapes\",\"authors\":\"Harsh H. Sawant,&nbsp;Rahul Gujar,&nbsp;Neeta Mandhare,&nbsp;M. J. Sable,&nbsp;Prashant K. Ambadekar,&nbsp;S. H. Gawande\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/fld.5395\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This work investigates the optimization of airfoil shapes using various reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms, including Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG), Twin Delayed Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (TD3), and Trust Region Policy Optimization (TRPO). The primary objective is to enhance the aerodynamic performance of airfoils by maximizing lift forces across different angles of attack (AoA). The study compares the optimized airfoils against the standard NACA 2412 airfoil. The DDPG-optimized airfoil demonstrated superior performance at lower and moderate AoAs, while the TRPO-optimized airfoil excelled at higher AoAs. In contrast, the TD3-optimized airfoil consistently underperformed. The results indicate that RL algorithms, particularly DDPG and TRPO, can effectively improve airfoil designs, offering substantial benefits in lift generation. This paper underscores the potential of RL techniques in aerodynamic shape optimization, presenting significant implications for aerospace and related industries.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids\",\"volume\":\"97 8\",\"pages\":\"1142-1156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fld.5395\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fld.5395","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项工作研究了使用各种强化学习(RL)算法优化翼型形状,包括深度确定性策略梯度(DDPG),双延迟深度确定性策略梯度(TD3)和信任域策略优化(TRPO)。主要目标是通过最大化不同攻角(AoA)的升力来提高翼型的气动性能。该研究比较了优化的翼型对标准NACA 2412翼型。ddpg优化翼型在低AoAs和中等AoAs表现优异,而trpo优化翼型在高AoAs表现优异。相比之下,td3优化翼型始终表现不佳。结果表明,RL算法,特别是DDPG和TRPO,可以有效地改进翼型设计,在升力产生方面提供了实质性的好处。本文强调了RL技术在气动形状优化方面的潜力,对航空航天和相关行业具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of Reinforcement Learning Agents for Optimizing Airfoil Shapes

This work investigates the optimization of airfoil shapes using various reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms, including Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG), Twin Delayed Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (TD3), and Trust Region Policy Optimization (TRPO). The primary objective is to enhance the aerodynamic performance of airfoils by maximizing lift forces across different angles of attack (AoA). The study compares the optimized airfoils against the standard NACA 2412 airfoil. The DDPG-optimized airfoil demonstrated superior performance at lower and moderate AoAs, while the TRPO-optimized airfoil excelled at higher AoAs. In contrast, the TD3-optimized airfoil consistently underperformed. The results indicate that RL algorithms, particularly DDPG and TRPO, can effectively improve airfoil designs, offering substantial benefits in lift generation. This paper underscores the potential of RL techniques in aerodynamic shape optimization, presenting significant implications for aerospace and related industries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 物理-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
111
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids publishes refereed papers describing significant developments in computational methods that are applicable to scientific and engineering problems in fluid mechanics, fluid dynamics, micro and bio fluidics, and fluid-structure interaction. Numerical methods for solving ancillary equations, such as transport and advection and diffusion, are also relevant. The Editors encourage contributions in the areas of multi-physics, multi-disciplinary and multi-scale problems involving fluid subsystems, verification and validation, uncertainty quantification, and model reduction. Numerical examples that illustrate the described methods or their accuracy are in general expected. Discussions of papers already in print are also considered. However, papers dealing strictly with applications of existing methods or dealing with areas of research that are not deemed to be cutting edge by the Editors will not be considered for review. The journal publishes full-length papers, which should normally be less than 25 journal pages in length. Two-part papers are discouraged unless considered necessary by the Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信