审计员额外计费和客户发起的审计员变更

IF 2.1 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Francis Goddard, Martin Schmidt
{"title":"审计员额外计费和客户发起的审计员变更","authors":"Francis Goddard,&nbsp;Martin Schmidt","doi":"10.1111/ijau.12373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper examines how auditor extra-billing and the quality of the auditor–board member relationship affect client-initiated auditor changes. Extra-billing is an auditor billing practice where the auditor invoices a higher amount than originally negotiated with the client. Although extra-billing is common in audit practice, it has not yet received much attention in audit research. Understanding audit as a professional service, we conceptualize extra-billing as a factor that is instrumental in creating or preventing bonding, which influences the repeat purchasing behaviour of a client, such as retaining an incumbent auditor. Seventy-eight board members responsible for audit matters completed a case that varied auditor extra-billing (no extra-billing or extra-billing) and the quality of the auditor–board member relationship (good or bad relationship). The results show that both an extra-billing and a bad auditor–board member relationship increase the likelihood of a client-initiated auditor change. These results have important implications for auditors, auditees and audit regulators.</p>","PeriodicalId":47092,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Auditing","volume":"29 3","pages":"348-365"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijau.12373","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Auditor Extra-Billing and Client-Initiated Auditor Changes\",\"authors\":\"Francis Goddard,&nbsp;Martin Schmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijau.12373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper examines how auditor extra-billing and the quality of the auditor–board member relationship affect client-initiated auditor changes. Extra-billing is an auditor billing practice where the auditor invoices a higher amount than originally negotiated with the client. Although extra-billing is common in audit practice, it has not yet received much attention in audit research. Understanding audit as a professional service, we conceptualize extra-billing as a factor that is instrumental in creating or preventing bonding, which influences the repeat purchasing behaviour of a client, such as retaining an incumbent auditor. Seventy-eight board members responsible for audit matters completed a case that varied auditor extra-billing (no extra-billing or extra-billing) and the quality of the auditor–board member relationship (good or bad relationship). The results show that both an extra-billing and a bad auditor–board member relationship increase the likelihood of a client-initiated auditor change. These results have important implications for auditors, auditees and audit regulators.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Auditing\",\"volume\":\"29 3\",\"pages\":\"348-365\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijau.12373\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Auditing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijau.12373\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Auditing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijau.12373","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了审计师额外收费和审计委员会成员关系的质量如何影响客户发起的审计师变更。额外开票是审计师开票的一种做法,审计师开票的金额高于最初与客户协商的金额。虽然超额收费在审计实践中很常见,但在审计研究中尚未引起重视。将审计理解为一种专业服务,我们将额外收费概念为一种有助于建立或防止联系的因素,这种联系会影响客户的重复购买行为,例如保留现任审计员。78名负责审计事务的董事会成员完成了一个案例,分析了不同的审计师额外计费(无额外计费或额外计费)和审计委员会成员关系的质量(好或坏的关系)。结果表明,额外计费和不良的审计委员会成员关系都增加了客户发起的审计师变更的可能性。这些结果对审计师、被审计单位和审计监管机构具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Auditor Extra-Billing and Client-Initiated Auditor Changes

Auditor Extra-Billing and Client-Initiated Auditor Changes

This paper examines how auditor extra-billing and the quality of the auditor–board member relationship affect client-initiated auditor changes. Extra-billing is an auditor billing practice where the auditor invoices a higher amount than originally negotiated with the client. Although extra-billing is common in audit practice, it has not yet received much attention in audit research. Understanding audit as a professional service, we conceptualize extra-billing as a factor that is instrumental in creating or preventing bonding, which influences the repeat purchasing behaviour of a client, such as retaining an incumbent auditor. Seventy-eight board members responsible for audit matters completed a case that varied auditor extra-billing (no extra-billing or extra-billing) and the quality of the auditor–board member relationship (good or bad relationship). The results show that both an extra-billing and a bad auditor–board member relationship increase the likelihood of a client-initiated auditor change. These results have important implications for auditors, auditees and audit regulators.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
15.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: In addition to communicating the results of original auditing research, the International Journal of Auditing also aims to advance knowledge in auditing by publishing critiques, thought leadership papers and literature reviews on specific aspects of auditing. The journal seeks to publish articles that have international appeal either due to the topic transcending national frontiers or due to the clear potential for readers to apply the results or ideas in their local environments. While articles must be methodologically and theoretically sound, any research orientation is acceptable. This means that papers may have an analytical and statistical, behavioural, economic and financial (including agency), sociological, critical, or historical basis. The editors consider articles for publication which fit into one or more of the following subject categories: • Financial statement audits • Public sector/governmental auditing • Internal auditing • Audit education and methods of teaching auditing (including case studies) • Audit aspects of corporate governance, including audit committees • Audit quality • Audit fees and related issues • Environmental, social and sustainability audits • Audit related ethical issues • Audit regulation • Independence issues • Legal liability and other legal issues • Auditing history • New and emerging audit and assurance issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信