多次抗反流粘膜切除术/抗反流粘膜消融治疗后不完全贲门重建术的临床特点及疗效

IF 1.5 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
DEN open Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1002/deo2.70169
Ippei Tanaka, Haruhiro Inoue, Mayo Tanabe, Yoshiaki Kimoto, Kei Ushikubo, Kazuki Yamamoto, Yohei Nishikawa, Nikko Theodore Valencia Raymundo, Kazuya Sumi
{"title":"多次抗反流粘膜切除术/抗反流粘膜消融治疗后不完全贲门重建术的临床特点及疗效","authors":"Ippei Tanaka,&nbsp;Haruhiro Inoue,&nbsp;Mayo Tanabe,&nbsp;Yoshiaki Kimoto,&nbsp;Kei Ushikubo,&nbsp;Kazuki Yamamoto,&nbsp;Yohei Nishikawa,&nbsp;Nikko Theodore Valencia Raymundo,&nbsp;Kazuya Sumi","doi":"10.1002/deo2.70169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) and anti-reflux mucosal ablation (ARMA) are novel endoscopic treatments for proton pump inhibitor or potassium-competitive acid blocker-refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease. These procedures induce scarring of the artificial ulcer at the gastric cardia, which tightens the enlarged cardiac opening. However, we encountered patients with unresolved symptoms due to insufficient cardiac shrinkage despite multiple ARMS/ARMA treatments. This study analyzed the frequency and characteristics of the refractory cases.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent ARMS/ARMA treatments at our institution from January 2014 to October 2022. Refractory cases were defined as those undergoing multiple ARMS/ARMA treatments but with insufficient cardiac shrinkage and also persistence of reflux symptoms.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Out of 131 ARMS/ARMA patients, seven (5.3%) cases were categorized as refractory cases. The male-to-female ratio was 5:2, with a mean age of 70 (58–73) years, and a mean BMI of 20.4 (20.0–24.0). Gastroesophageal reflux disease grades were grade <i>N</i> (<i>n</i> = 2), M (<i>n</i> = 2), B (<i>n</i> = 2), and C (<i>n</i> = 1). All had NERD diagnosis confirmed by pH monitoring. One patient underwent ARMS twice, two underwent ARMA after ARMS, and four had ARMA more than twice, but none achieved sufficient cardia shrinkage. Finally, three cases were managed with medication, while four required surgical fundoplication, which improved their symptoms.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Approximately 5% of ARMS/ARMA cases could not achieve sufficient cardiac shrinkage. However, the surgical treatment performed as a final step was effective, which may suggest that ARMS/ARMA treatment serves as a treatment option between medical therapy and surgical treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93973,"journal":{"name":"DEN open","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/deo2.70169","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Incomplete Cardia Reconstruction Cases Following Multiple Anti-reflux Mucosectomy/Anti-reflux Mucosal Ablation Treatments\",\"authors\":\"Ippei Tanaka,&nbsp;Haruhiro Inoue,&nbsp;Mayo Tanabe,&nbsp;Yoshiaki Kimoto,&nbsp;Kei Ushikubo,&nbsp;Kazuki Yamamoto,&nbsp;Yohei Nishikawa,&nbsp;Nikko Theodore Valencia Raymundo,&nbsp;Kazuya Sumi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/deo2.70169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) and anti-reflux mucosal ablation (ARMA) are novel endoscopic treatments for proton pump inhibitor or potassium-competitive acid blocker-refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease. These procedures induce scarring of the artificial ulcer at the gastric cardia, which tightens the enlarged cardiac opening. However, we encountered patients with unresolved symptoms due to insufficient cardiac shrinkage despite multiple ARMS/ARMA treatments. This study analyzed the frequency and characteristics of the refractory cases.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent ARMS/ARMA treatments at our institution from January 2014 to October 2022. Refractory cases were defined as those undergoing multiple ARMS/ARMA treatments but with insufficient cardiac shrinkage and also persistence of reflux symptoms.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Out of 131 ARMS/ARMA patients, seven (5.3%) cases were categorized as refractory cases. The male-to-female ratio was 5:2, with a mean age of 70 (58–73) years, and a mean BMI of 20.4 (20.0–24.0). Gastroesophageal reflux disease grades were grade <i>N</i> (<i>n</i> = 2), M (<i>n</i> = 2), B (<i>n</i> = 2), and C (<i>n</i> = 1). All had NERD diagnosis confirmed by pH monitoring. One patient underwent ARMS twice, two underwent ARMA after ARMS, and four had ARMA more than twice, but none achieved sufficient cardia shrinkage. Finally, three cases were managed with medication, while four required surgical fundoplication, which improved their symptoms.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Approximately 5% of ARMS/ARMA cases could not achieve sufficient cardiac shrinkage. However, the surgical treatment performed as a final step was effective, which may suggest that ARMS/ARMA treatment serves as a treatment option between medical therapy and surgical treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DEN open\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/deo2.70169\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DEN open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70169\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEN open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抗反流粘膜切除术(ARMS)和抗反流粘膜消融(ARMA)是治疗质子泵抑制剂或钾竞争性酸阻滞剂难治性胃食管反流病的新型内镜治疗方法。这些手术会在贲门人工溃疡处形成疤痕,从而使扩大的心口收紧。然而,我们遇到了一些患者,尽管进行了多次ARMS/ARMA治疗,但由于心脏收缩不足,症状仍未解决。本研究分析了难治性病例的发生频率和特点。方法回顾性分析2014年1月至2022年10月在我院接受ARMS/ARMA治疗的患者。难治性病例定义为接受多次ARMS/ARMA治疗但心脏收缩不足且持续存在反流症状的患者。结果131例ARMS/ARMA患者中,7例(5.3%)为难治性病例。男女比例为5:2,平均年龄70(58 ~ 73)岁,平均BMI为20.4(20.0 ~ 24.0)。胃食管反流病分级为N级(N = 2)、M级(N = 2)、B级(N = 2)、C级(N = 1)。所有患者均经pH监测确诊为NERD。1例患者进行了两次ARMS, 2例在ARMS后进行了ARMA, 4例进行了两次以上的ARMA,但没有一例达到足够的心脏收缩。最后,3例患者接受药物治疗,4例患者接受手术,改善了症状。结论约5%的ARMS/ARMA患者不能达到足够的心脏收缩。然而,作为最后一步的手术治疗是有效的,这可能表明ARMS/ARMA治疗可以作为药物治疗和手术治疗之间的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Incomplete Cardia Reconstruction Cases Following Multiple Anti-reflux Mucosectomy/Anti-reflux Mucosal Ablation Treatments

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Incomplete Cardia Reconstruction Cases Following Multiple Anti-reflux Mucosectomy/Anti-reflux Mucosal Ablation Treatments

Introduction

Anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) and anti-reflux mucosal ablation (ARMA) are novel endoscopic treatments for proton pump inhibitor or potassium-competitive acid blocker-refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease. These procedures induce scarring of the artificial ulcer at the gastric cardia, which tightens the enlarged cardiac opening. However, we encountered patients with unresolved symptoms due to insufficient cardiac shrinkage despite multiple ARMS/ARMA treatments. This study analyzed the frequency and characteristics of the refractory cases.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent ARMS/ARMA treatments at our institution from January 2014 to October 2022. Refractory cases were defined as those undergoing multiple ARMS/ARMA treatments but with insufficient cardiac shrinkage and also persistence of reflux symptoms.

Results

Out of 131 ARMS/ARMA patients, seven (5.3%) cases were categorized as refractory cases. The male-to-female ratio was 5:2, with a mean age of 70 (58–73) years, and a mean BMI of 20.4 (20.0–24.0). Gastroesophageal reflux disease grades were grade N (n = 2), M (n = 2), B (n = 2), and C (n = 1). All had NERD diagnosis confirmed by pH monitoring. One patient underwent ARMS twice, two underwent ARMA after ARMS, and four had ARMA more than twice, but none achieved sufficient cardia shrinkage. Finally, three cases were managed with medication, while four required surgical fundoplication, which improved their symptoms.

Conclusion

Approximately 5% of ARMS/ARMA cases could not achieve sufficient cardiac shrinkage. However, the surgical treatment performed as a final step was effective, which may suggest that ARMS/ARMA treatment serves as a treatment option between medical therapy and surgical treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信