电力市场治理和欧洲国家电力转型的历史表现:来自回顾性建模的见解

IF 7.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Marc Jaxa-Rozen, Xin Wen, Evelina Trutnevyte
{"title":"电力市场治理和欧洲国家电力转型的历史表现:来自回顾性建模的见解","authors":"Marc Jaxa-Rozen,&nbsp;Xin Wen,&nbsp;Evelina Trutnevyte","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2025.101787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the last decades, the governance of national electricity systems in Europe has experienced several shifts between market liberalization and policy intervention. However, there remains a lack of consistent evidence about impacts of electricity market governance on the performance of electricity systems. This work uses retrospective bottom-up modeling to explore potential links between electricity market governance in 31 European countries and their electricity system transitions during 1990–2019. We identify historical governance regimes based on indicators of market regulation, renewable electricity policy support, and combined regulation and policy support. To assess performance of electricity systems, we quantify deviations between modeled historical and least-cost pathways using net present costs per unit of supplied electricity, emissions intensity, transformation of generation mix, and share of new renewable technologies. Countries with earlier liberalization of electricity markets on average had higher unit net present costs, lower emissions intensity, and higher share of new renewable generation relative to modeled least-cost pathways. Countries combining late liberalization with high support for renewable generation, which includes countries with higher public ownership of incumbent low-carbon generation, had the lowest relative values for unit net present costs and emissions intensity. Further work could yield statistical insights on these patterns by combining our modeling approach with econometric analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"60 ","pages":"Article 101787"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electricity market governance and the historical performance of electricity transitions in European countries: insights from retrospective modeling\",\"authors\":\"Marc Jaxa-Rozen,&nbsp;Xin Wen,&nbsp;Evelina Trutnevyte\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esr.2025.101787\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In the last decades, the governance of national electricity systems in Europe has experienced several shifts between market liberalization and policy intervention. However, there remains a lack of consistent evidence about impacts of electricity market governance on the performance of electricity systems. This work uses retrospective bottom-up modeling to explore potential links between electricity market governance in 31 European countries and their electricity system transitions during 1990–2019. We identify historical governance regimes based on indicators of market regulation, renewable electricity policy support, and combined regulation and policy support. To assess performance of electricity systems, we quantify deviations between modeled historical and least-cost pathways using net present costs per unit of supplied electricity, emissions intensity, transformation of generation mix, and share of new renewable technologies. Countries with earlier liberalization of electricity markets on average had higher unit net present costs, lower emissions intensity, and higher share of new renewable generation relative to modeled least-cost pathways. Countries combining late liberalization with high support for renewable generation, which includes countries with higher public ownership of incumbent low-carbon generation, had the lowest relative values for unit net present costs and emissions intensity. Further work could yield statistical insights on these patterns by combining our modeling approach with econometric analysis.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Strategy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"60 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101787\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Strategy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X25001506\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X25001506","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的几十年里,欧洲国家电力系统的治理经历了市场自由化和政策干预之间的几次转变。然而,关于电力市场治理对电力系统绩效的影响,仍然缺乏一致的证据。这项工作使用回顾性自下而上的模型来探索1990-2019年期间31个欧洲国家的电力市场治理与其电力系统转型之间的潜在联系。我们根据市场监管、可再生电力政策支持以及监管和政策支持相结合的指标,确定了历史上的治理机制。为了评估电力系统的性能,我们使用每单位供应电力的净当前成本、排放强度、发电组合转换和新可再生能源技术的份额,量化了模型历史和最低成本路径之间的偏差。相对于模拟的最低成本途径,电力市场自由化较早的国家平均单位净现值较高,排放强度较低,新可再生能源发电的份额较高。将后期自由化与对可再生能源发电的高度支持结合起来的国家,包括对现有低碳发电拥有较高公共所有权的国家,其单位净当前成本和排放强度的相对值最低。通过将我们的建模方法与计量经济学分析相结合,进一步的工作可以产生对这些模式的统计见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Electricity market governance and the historical performance of electricity transitions in European countries: insights from retrospective modeling
In the last decades, the governance of national electricity systems in Europe has experienced several shifts between market liberalization and policy intervention. However, there remains a lack of consistent evidence about impacts of electricity market governance on the performance of electricity systems. This work uses retrospective bottom-up modeling to explore potential links between electricity market governance in 31 European countries and their electricity system transitions during 1990–2019. We identify historical governance regimes based on indicators of market regulation, renewable electricity policy support, and combined regulation and policy support. To assess performance of electricity systems, we quantify deviations between modeled historical and least-cost pathways using net present costs per unit of supplied electricity, emissions intensity, transformation of generation mix, and share of new renewable technologies. Countries with earlier liberalization of electricity markets on average had higher unit net present costs, lower emissions intensity, and higher share of new renewable generation relative to modeled least-cost pathways. Countries combining late liberalization with high support for renewable generation, which includes countries with higher public ownership of incumbent low-carbon generation, had the lowest relative values for unit net present costs and emissions intensity. Further work could yield statistical insights on these patterns by combining our modeling approach with econometric analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Strategy Reviews
Energy Strategy Reviews Energy-Energy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
167
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs. Energy Strategy Reviews publishes: • Analyses • Methodologies • Case Studies • Reviews And by invitation: • Report Reviews • Viewpoints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信