ct骨关节炎膝关节评分(coaks)多组分测量的可重复性

T.D. Turmezei , A. Boddu , N.H. Degala , J.A. Lynch , N.A. Segal
{"title":"ct骨关节炎膝关节评分(coaks)多组分测量的可重复性","authors":"T.D. Turmezei ,&nbsp;A. Boddu ,&nbsp;N.H. Degala ,&nbsp;J.A. Lynch ,&nbsp;N.A. Segal","doi":"10.1016/j.ostima.2025.100325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>INTRODUCTION</h3><div>The CT Osteoarthritis Knee Score (COAKS) is a semiquantitative system for grading structural disease features in knee OA from weight bearing CT (WBCT). Previous work has demonstrated excellent inter- and intra-observer reliability of COAKS with the aid of a feature scoring atlas, but test-retest repeatability has not yet been evaluated. There is growing interest in multicomponent measures in knee OA imaging research because they may provide granularity in structural feature evaluation, in particular with respect to study baseline stratification and monitoring progression. The multi-feature and multi-compartment nature of COAKS means that it could provide novel insights into OA morphotypes and structural disease progression if found to be robust.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>To evaluate test-retest agreement of COAKS multicomponent scores based on WBCT imaging.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>14 individuals recruited and consented at the University of Kansas Medical Center had baseline and follow-up WBCT imaging suitable for analysis. Participants were (mean ± SD) 61.3 ± 8.4 years old, with BMI 30.7 ± 4.3 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and had a male:female ratio of 8:6. All scanning was performed on a single XFI WBCT scanner (Planmed Oy, Helsinki, Finland) with the mean ± SD interval between baseline and follow-up attendances 14.9 ± 8.1 days. A Synaflexer<sup>TM</sup> device was used to standardize knee positioning during scanning. Imaging acquisition parameters were 96 kV tube voltage, 51.4 mA tube current, 3.5 s exposure time. A standard bone algorithm was applied for reconstruction with 0.3 mm isotropic voxels and a 21 cm vertical scan range. All scans were anonymised prior to analysis both according to the individual and imaging attendance. All knees were reviewed for COAKS by an experienced musculoskeletal radiologist (T.D.T.). Scores were recorded in a cloud-based file on Google Sheets (alongside the feature atlas in Google Docs) and read by custom MATLAB scripts to generate baseline versus follow-up difference plots and intraclass correlation coefficients for absolute agreement from a single observer, Shrout-Fleiss ICC(3,1). Scores for individual COAKS features (JSW, osteophytes, subchondral cysts, subchondral sclerosis) were combined across compartments. Compartment scores (medial tibiofemoral, lateral tibiofemoral, patellofemoral, proximal tibiofibular) were combined across features. Multicomponent scores were also summated for the whole tibiofemoral compartment (medial-lateral combined) and from across the whole knee joint.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>ICC values were excellent (&gt;0.81) for all multicomponent scores apart from subchondral sclerosis combined across all compartments (0.69, 0.43-0.84) and all features combined at the proximal tibiofibular joint (0.65, 0.38-0.82). Best agreement was seen for osteophytes combined across all compartments (0.93, 0.85-0.96) (Figure 1), all features combined at the medial tibiofemoral compartment (0.95, 0.90-0.98) and the lateral tibiofemoral compartment (0.97, 0.94-0.99). Full ICC results are given in Table 1. ICCs for all features combined across the whole tibiofemoral compartment (0.93, 0.86-0.97) (Figure 2) and across the whole knee joint (0.90, 0.79-0.95) were also near-perfect with data values.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>These data support excellent agreement for COAKS multicomponent scores by compartment, by feature, and as a whole. These results suggest that a multicomponent approach could offer sensitivity in distinguishing morphotypes and monitoring structural progression as personalised medicine approaches become more realistic in developing treatment strategies for OA. Having established the excellent repeatability of a multicomponent COAKS approach, it will now be essential to validate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74378,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis imaging","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100325"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"REPEATABILITY OF CT OSTEOARTHRITIS KNEE SCORE (COAKS) MULTICOMPONENT MEASURES\",\"authors\":\"T.D. Turmezei ,&nbsp;A. Boddu ,&nbsp;N.H. Degala ,&nbsp;J.A. Lynch ,&nbsp;N.A. Segal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ostima.2025.100325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>INTRODUCTION</h3><div>The CT Osteoarthritis Knee Score (COAKS) is a semiquantitative system for grading structural disease features in knee OA from weight bearing CT (WBCT). Previous work has demonstrated excellent inter- and intra-observer reliability of COAKS with the aid of a feature scoring atlas, but test-retest repeatability has not yet been evaluated. There is growing interest in multicomponent measures in knee OA imaging research because they may provide granularity in structural feature evaluation, in particular with respect to study baseline stratification and monitoring progression. The multi-feature and multi-compartment nature of COAKS means that it could provide novel insights into OA morphotypes and structural disease progression if found to be robust.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>To evaluate test-retest agreement of COAKS multicomponent scores based on WBCT imaging.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>14 individuals recruited and consented at the University of Kansas Medical Center had baseline and follow-up WBCT imaging suitable for analysis. Participants were (mean ± SD) 61.3 ± 8.4 years old, with BMI 30.7 ± 4.3 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and had a male:female ratio of 8:6. All scanning was performed on a single XFI WBCT scanner (Planmed Oy, Helsinki, Finland) with the mean ± SD interval between baseline and follow-up attendances 14.9 ± 8.1 days. A Synaflexer<sup>TM</sup> device was used to standardize knee positioning during scanning. Imaging acquisition parameters were 96 kV tube voltage, 51.4 mA tube current, 3.5 s exposure time. A standard bone algorithm was applied for reconstruction with 0.3 mm isotropic voxels and a 21 cm vertical scan range. All scans were anonymised prior to analysis both according to the individual and imaging attendance. All knees were reviewed for COAKS by an experienced musculoskeletal radiologist (T.D.T.). Scores were recorded in a cloud-based file on Google Sheets (alongside the feature atlas in Google Docs) and read by custom MATLAB scripts to generate baseline versus follow-up difference plots and intraclass correlation coefficients for absolute agreement from a single observer, Shrout-Fleiss ICC(3,1). Scores for individual COAKS features (JSW, osteophytes, subchondral cysts, subchondral sclerosis) were combined across compartments. Compartment scores (medial tibiofemoral, lateral tibiofemoral, patellofemoral, proximal tibiofibular) were combined across features. Multicomponent scores were also summated for the whole tibiofemoral compartment (medial-lateral combined) and from across the whole knee joint.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>ICC values were excellent (&gt;0.81) for all multicomponent scores apart from subchondral sclerosis combined across all compartments (0.69, 0.43-0.84) and all features combined at the proximal tibiofibular joint (0.65, 0.38-0.82). Best agreement was seen for osteophytes combined across all compartments (0.93, 0.85-0.96) (Figure 1), all features combined at the medial tibiofemoral compartment (0.95, 0.90-0.98) and the lateral tibiofemoral compartment (0.97, 0.94-0.99). Full ICC results are given in Table 1. ICCs for all features combined across the whole tibiofemoral compartment (0.93, 0.86-0.97) (Figure 2) and across the whole knee joint (0.90, 0.79-0.95) were also near-perfect with data values.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>These data support excellent agreement for COAKS multicomponent scores by compartment, by feature, and as a whole. These results suggest that a multicomponent approach could offer sensitivity in distinguishing morphotypes and monitoring structural progression as personalised medicine approaches become more realistic in developing treatment strategies for OA. Having established the excellent repeatability of a multicomponent COAKS approach, it will now be essential to validate.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Osteoarthritis imaging\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100325\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Osteoarthritis imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772654125000650\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772654125000650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

CT骨关节炎膝关节评分(COAKS)是一种半定量系统,用于从负重CT (WBCT)对膝关节OA的结构性疾病特征进行分级。先前的工作已经证明了COAKS在特征评分图谱的帮助下在观察者之间和观察者内部具有出色的可靠性,但测试-重复测试的可重复性尚未得到评估。人们对膝关节OA成像研究中的多组分测量越来越感兴趣,因为它们可以提供结构特征评估的粒度,特别是在研究基线分层和监测进展方面。COAKS的多特征和多室性意味着,如果发现它是可靠的,它可以为OA形态和结构性疾病进展提供新的见解。目的评价基于WBCT成像的COAKS多分量评分的重测一致性。方法在堪萨斯大学医学中心招募并同意的14名患者进行了适合分析的基线和随访WBCT成像。参与者年龄(mean±SD) 61.3±8.4,BMI 30.7±4.3 kg/m2,男女比例为8:6。所有扫描均在一台XFI WBCT扫描仪上进行(planed Oy, Helsinki, Finland),基线和随访时间的平均±SD间隔为14.9±8.1天。扫描时使用SynaflexerTM设备对膝关节定位进行标准化。成像采集参数为96 kV管电压,51.4 mA管电流,3.5 s曝光时间。采用标准骨算法重建,各向同性体素为0.3 mm,垂直扫描范围为21 cm。所有的扫描在分析前都是匿名的,根据个人和成像出勤率。所有膝关节均由经验丰富的肌肉骨骼放射科医生(T.D.T.)检查是否有COAKS。评分记录在谷歌Sheets上的基于云的文件中(与谷歌Docs中的特征图谱一起),并通过自定义MATLAB脚本读取,以生成基线与随访差异图和类内相关系数,以获得来自单个观察者shroutt - fleiss ICC(3,1)的绝对一致。各个COAKS特征(JSW、骨赘、软骨下囊肿、软骨下硬化)的评分跨室合并。各特征间室评分(胫股内侧、胫股外侧、髌股、胫腓骨近端)合并。对整个胫股间室(内外侧联合)和整个膝关节的多组分评分也进行了汇总。结果除了关节间室软骨下硬化(0.69,0.43-0.84)和近端胫腓关节(0.65,0.38-0.82)外,所有多组分评分的icc值都很好(>0.81)。所有骨赘合并在所有骨间(0.93,0.85-0.96)(图1),所有特征合并在胫骨股间室内侧(0.95,0.90-0.98)和胫骨股间室外侧(0.97,0.94-0.99)。表1给出了完整的ICC结果。所有特征的ICCs结合整个胫股间室(0.93,0.86-0.97)(图2)和整个膝关节(0.90,0.79-0.95)的数据值也接近完美。结论这些数据支持COAKS多成分评分在区隔、特征和整体上的良好一致性。这些结果表明,随着个性化医学方法在制定OA治疗策略方面变得更加现实,多组分方法可以在区分形态和监测结构进展方面提供敏感性。在建立了多组分COAKS方法的出色可重复性之后,现在必须对其进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
REPEATABILITY OF CT OSTEOARTHRITIS KNEE SCORE (COAKS) MULTICOMPONENT MEASURES

INTRODUCTION

The CT Osteoarthritis Knee Score (COAKS) is a semiquantitative system for grading structural disease features in knee OA from weight bearing CT (WBCT). Previous work has demonstrated excellent inter- and intra-observer reliability of COAKS with the aid of a feature scoring atlas, but test-retest repeatability has not yet been evaluated. There is growing interest in multicomponent measures in knee OA imaging research because they may provide granularity in structural feature evaluation, in particular with respect to study baseline stratification and monitoring progression. The multi-feature and multi-compartment nature of COAKS means that it could provide novel insights into OA morphotypes and structural disease progression if found to be robust.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate test-retest agreement of COAKS multicomponent scores based on WBCT imaging.

METHODS

14 individuals recruited and consented at the University of Kansas Medical Center had baseline and follow-up WBCT imaging suitable for analysis. Participants were (mean ± SD) 61.3 ± 8.4 years old, with BMI 30.7 ± 4.3 kg/m2 and had a male:female ratio of 8:6. All scanning was performed on a single XFI WBCT scanner (Planmed Oy, Helsinki, Finland) with the mean ± SD interval between baseline and follow-up attendances 14.9 ± 8.1 days. A SynaflexerTM device was used to standardize knee positioning during scanning. Imaging acquisition parameters were 96 kV tube voltage, 51.4 mA tube current, 3.5 s exposure time. A standard bone algorithm was applied for reconstruction with 0.3 mm isotropic voxels and a 21 cm vertical scan range. All scans were anonymised prior to analysis both according to the individual and imaging attendance. All knees were reviewed for COAKS by an experienced musculoskeletal radiologist (T.D.T.). Scores were recorded in a cloud-based file on Google Sheets (alongside the feature atlas in Google Docs) and read by custom MATLAB scripts to generate baseline versus follow-up difference plots and intraclass correlation coefficients for absolute agreement from a single observer, Shrout-Fleiss ICC(3,1). Scores for individual COAKS features (JSW, osteophytes, subchondral cysts, subchondral sclerosis) were combined across compartments. Compartment scores (medial tibiofemoral, lateral tibiofemoral, patellofemoral, proximal tibiofibular) were combined across features. Multicomponent scores were also summated for the whole tibiofemoral compartment (medial-lateral combined) and from across the whole knee joint.

RESULTS

ICC values were excellent (>0.81) for all multicomponent scores apart from subchondral sclerosis combined across all compartments (0.69, 0.43-0.84) and all features combined at the proximal tibiofibular joint (0.65, 0.38-0.82). Best agreement was seen for osteophytes combined across all compartments (0.93, 0.85-0.96) (Figure 1), all features combined at the medial tibiofemoral compartment (0.95, 0.90-0.98) and the lateral tibiofemoral compartment (0.97, 0.94-0.99). Full ICC results are given in Table 1. ICCs for all features combined across the whole tibiofemoral compartment (0.93, 0.86-0.97) (Figure 2) and across the whole knee joint (0.90, 0.79-0.95) were also near-perfect with data values.

CONCLUSION

These data support excellent agreement for COAKS multicomponent scores by compartment, by feature, and as a whole. These results suggest that a multicomponent approach could offer sensitivity in distinguishing morphotypes and monitoring structural progression as personalised medicine approaches become more realistic in developing treatment strategies for OA. Having established the excellent repeatability of a multicomponent COAKS approach, it will now be essential to validate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Osteoarthritis imaging
Osteoarthritis imaging Radiology and Imaging
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信