谷物、谷物、作物和豆类行业循环和生命周期评估方向的多准则决策分析:加拿大案例研究

IF 8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Joël Mongeon, Ebenezer M. Kwofie, Raphael Aidoo, Joyce Selby
{"title":"谷物、谷物、作物和豆类行业循环和生命周期评估方向的多准则决策分析:加拿大案例研究","authors":"Joël Mongeon,&nbsp;Ebenezer M. Kwofie,&nbsp;Raphael Aidoo,&nbsp;Joyce Selby","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study extensively analyzes Life Cycle Assessments (LCAs) and circular economy solutions in the Canadian grains, crops, cereals, and pulse (GCCP) industry. The analysis reveals that corn, canola, and wheat are the most represented GCCP commodities in existing LCAs. At the same time, Saskatchewan and Ontario remain underrepresented relative to provincial GDP derived from GCCPs, particularly in oilseed and coarse grain assessments. Environmental LCAs (ELCAs) dominate the sector, with a limited focus on economic and social LCAs (s-LCA). The multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) technique of Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) and entropy method was conducted to identify commodities and relevant circular economy solutions that require further LCA assessments. Using the proposed circular economy for research conceptual framework, it was determined that wheat, barley, and corn should be prioritized for future LCAs, and more extensive efforts should be conducted for soybeans. Consequently, single cell protein, corn bioethanol, and corn pellets emerged as promising circular economy solutions despite potential challenges in implementation. A correlation analysis revealed that hemp should prioritize LCA assessments of systems at the farm and processing gate, whereas corn and wheat should prioritize LCA modeling in circular innovations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"391 ","pages":"Article 126227"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-criteria decision-analysis on the circularity and life cycle assessment direction in grains, cereals, crops, and pulses industry: A Canadian Case Study\",\"authors\":\"Joël Mongeon,&nbsp;Ebenezer M. Kwofie,&nbsp;Raphael Aidoo,&nbsp;Joyce Selby\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study extensively analyzes Life Cycle Assessments (LCAs) and circular economy solutions in the Canadian grains, crops, cereals, and pulse (GCCP) industry. The analysis reveals that corn, canola, and wheat are the most represented GCCP commodities in existing LCAs. At the same time, Saskatchewan and Ontario remain underrepresented relative to provincial GDP derived from GCCPs, particularly in oilseed and coarse grain assessments. Environmental LCAs (ELCAs) dominate the sector, with a limited focus on economic and social LCAs (s-LCA). The multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) technique of Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) and entropy method was conducted to identify commodities and relevant circular economy solutions that require further LCA assessments. Using the proposed circular economy for research conceptual framework, it was determined that wheat, barley, and corn should be prioritized for future LCAs, and more extensive efforts should be conducted for soybeans. Consequently, single cell protein, corn bioethanol, and corn pellets emerged as promising circular economy solutions despite potential challenges in implementation. A correlation analysis revealed that hemp should prioritize LCA assessments of systems at the farm and processing gate, whereas corn and wheat should prioritize LCA modeling in circular innovations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"391 \",\"pages\":\"Article 126227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725022030\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725022030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究广泛分析了加拿大谷物、作物、谷物和豆类(GCCP)行业的生命周期评估(LCAs)和循环经济解决方案。分析表明,玉米、油菜籽和小麦是现有lca中最具代表性的GCCP商品。与此同时,萨斯喀彻温省和安大略省的代表性仍然不足,特别是在油籽和粗粮评估方面。环境lca (elca)占主导地位,对经济和社会lca (s-LCA)的关注有限。采用多准则决策分析(MCDA)技术,结合妥协解(CoCoSo)和熵值法,确定需要进一步LCA评估的商品和相关循环经济解决方案。利用提出的循环经济研究概念框架,确定小麦、大麦和玉米应优先用于未来的LCAs,而大豆应进行更广泛的努力。因此,尽管在实施过程中存在潜在挑战,单细胞蛋白、玉米生物乙醇和玉米颗粒仍成为有希望的循环经济解决方案。相关分析显示,大麻应该优先考虑农场和加工环节的系统LCA评估,而玉米和小麦应该优先考虑循环创新中的LCA建模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-criteria decision-analysis on the circularity and life cycle assessment direction in grains, cereals, crops, and pulses industry: A Canadian Case Study
This study extensively analyzes Life Cycle Assessments (LCAs) and circular economy solutions in the Canadian grains, crops, cereals, and pulse (GCCP) industry. The analysis reveals that corn, canola, and wheat are the most represented GCCP commodities in existing LCAs. At the same time, Saskatchewan and Ontario remain underrepresented relative to provincial GDP derived from GCCPs, particularly in oilseed and coarse grain assessments. Environmental LCAs (ELCAs) dominate the sector, with a limited focus on economic and social LCAs (s-LCA). The multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) technique of Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) and entropy method was conducted to identify commodities and relevant circular economy solutions that require further LCA assessments. Using the proposed circular economy for research conceptual framework, it was determined that wheat, barley, and corn should be prioritized for future LCAs, and more extensive efforts should be conducted for soybeans. Consequently, single cell protein, corn bioethanol, and corn pellets emerged as promising circular economy solutions despite potential challenges in implementation. A correlation analysis revealed that hemp should prioritize LCA assessments of systems at the farm and processing gate, whereas corn and wheat should prioritize LCA modeling in circular innovations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信