推进髋关节骨关节炎预测:从多模态预测模型与世界教练联盟的个人参与者数据的见解

M.A. van den Berg , F. Boel , M.M.A. van Buuren , N.S. Riedstra , J. Tang , H. Ahedi , N. Arden , S.M.A. Bierma-Zeinstra , C.G. Boer , F.M. Cicuttini , T.F. Cootes , K.M. Crossley , D.T. Felson , W.P. Gielis , J.J. Heerey , G. Jones , S. Kluzek , N.E. Lane , C. Lindner , J.A. Lynch , R. Agricola
{"title":"推进髋关节骨关节炎预测:从多模态预测模型与世界教练联盟的个人参与者数据的见解","authors":"M.A. van den Berg ,&nbsp;F. Boel ,&nbsp;M.M.A. van Buuren ,&nbsp;N.S. Riedstra ,&nbsp;J. Tang ,&nbsp;H. Ahedi ,&nbsp;N. Arden ,&nbsp;S.M.A. Bierma-Zeinstra ,&nbsp;C.G. Boer ,&nbsp;F.M. Cicuttini ,&nbsp;T.F. Cootes ,&nbsp;K.M. Crossley ,&nbsp;D.T. Felson ,&nbsp;W.P. Gielis ,&nbsp;J.J. Heerey ,&nbsp;G. Jones ,&nbsp;S. Kluzek ,&nbsp;N.E. Lane ,&nbsp;C. Lindner ,&nbsp;J.A. Lynch ,&nbsp;R. Agricola","doi":"10.1016/j.ostima.2025.100343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>INTRODUCTION</h3><div>Radiographic hip osteoarthritis (RHOA) is a multifactorial disease, making early detection of individuals at risk challenging yet essential for timely intervention and evaluation of preventive strategies. Integrating information on multiple different data modalities using individual participant data from diverse cohorts may enhance predictive modeling in the early stages of RHOA. A focus on model interpretability may further enable the identification of clinically relevant patient subgroups and potential intervention targets.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>Creating a multi-modal prediction model for improving the performance of RHOA incidence prediction models compared to clinical features alone, and investigating the estimated predictor effects and the generalizability of the models to similar populations.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>We pooled individual participant data from nine prospective cohort studies within the Worldwide Collaboration on OsteoArthritis prediCtion for the Hip (World COACH consortium). All studies included standardized anteroposterior pelvic, long-limb, and/or hip radiographs, assessed for RHOA at baseline and after 4–8 years of follow-up. Incident RHOA was defined as the development of RHOA (grade ≥2) in hips without definite RHOA at baseline (grade &lt;2). The original cohort values of clinical predictors including age, birth-assigned sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, diabetes, and hip pain were harmonized into one consistent dataset. X-ray-derived predictors describing the hip morphology, the alpha angle and the lateral center edge angle, were automatically and uniformly determined using automated landmark points placed with Bonefinder®. Additionally, the values of 13 shape modes explaining 85% of the variation from a landmark-based statistical shape model were included. This SSM was built on all baseline RHOA grade &lt;2 hips within World COACH. Risk prediction models were built with generalized linear mixed effects models (GLMM) and Random Forest (RF) models while adjusting for correlations within cohorts and individuals. The discriminative performance (AUC) of different model configurations and the linear versus non-linear approaches were compared through stratified 5-fold cross-validation. For each model configuration, predictions were made with and without cohort labels to assess heterogeneity between cohorts.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>In total, 29,110 hips without definite RHOA at baseline were included of which 5.0% developed RHOA within 4-8 years (mean age 63.7 (8.6) years, 75.5% female, mean BMI 27.5 (4.7) kg/m<sup>2</sup>). When comparing our uni-modal prediction model using only the clinical predictors (Model 1) to those with X-ray information added (Table 1), we observed a higher discriminative performance for the multi-modal models. Overall, including cohort information significantly improved model performance (p &lt; 0.05), and the RF models have a slightly but not significantly better performance than the GLMMs. Comparing the average effects of the significant predictors of the models including all predictors on incident RHOA (Figure 1), showed most differences between the GLMM and RF estimated effects at the maximum and minimum predictor values.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>By leveraging multi-modal data, we could improve our predictions of incident RHOA compared to clinical features alone. Our findings indicate that there would be a benefit for considering non-linear modeling approaches for this task in future work.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74378,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis imaging","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100343"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ADVANCING HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS PREDICTION: INSIGHTS FROM MULTI-MODAL PREDICTIVE MODELING WITH INDIVIDUAL PARTICIPANT DATA OF THE WORLD COACH CONSORTIUM\",\"authors\":\"M.A. van den Berg ,&nbsp;F. Boel ,&nbsp;M.M.A. van Buuren ,&nbsp;N.S. Riedstra ,&nbsp;J. Tang ,&nbsp;H. Ahedi ,&nbsp;N. Arden ,&nbsp;S.M.A. Bierma-Zeinstra ,&nbsp;C.G. Boer ,&nbsp;F.M. Cicuttini ,&nbsp;T.F. Cootes ,&nbsp;K.M. Crossley ,&nbsp;D.T. Felson ,&nbsp;W.P. Gielis ,&nbsp;J.J. Heerey ,&nbsp;G. Jones ,&nbsp;S. Kluzek ,&nbsp;N.E. Lane ,&nbsp;C. Lindner ,&nbsp;J.A. Lynch ,&nbsp;R. Agricola\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ostima.2025.100343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>INTRODUCTION</h3><div>Radiographic hip osteoarthritis (RHOA) is a multifactorial disease, making early detection of individuals at risk challenging yet essential for timely intervention and evaluation of preventive strategies. Integrating information on multiple different data modalities using individual participant data from diverse cohorts may enhance predictive modeling in the early stages of RHOA. A focus on model interpretability may further enable the identification of clinically relevant patient subgroups and potential intervention targets.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>Creating a multi-modal prediction model for improving the performance of RHOA incidence prediction models compared to clinical features alone, and investigating the estimated predictor effects and the generalizability of the models to similar populations.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>We pooled individual participant data from nine prospective cohort studies within the Worldwide Collaboration on OsteoArthritis prediCtion for the Hip (World COACH consortium). All studies included standardized anteroposterior pelvic, long-limb, and/or hip radiographs, assessed for RHOA at baseline and after 4–8 years of follow-up. Incident RHOA was defined as the development of RHOA (grade ≥2) in hips without definite RHOA at baseline (grade &lt;2). The original cohort values of clinical predictors including age, birth-assigned sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, diabetes, and hip pain were harmonized into one consistent dataset. X-ray-derived predictors describing the hip morphology, the alpha angle and the lateral center edge angle, were automatically and uniformly determined using automated landmark points placed with Bonefinder®. Additionally, the values of 13 shape modes explaining 85% of the variation from a landmark-based statistical shape model were included. This SSM was built on all baseline RHOA grade &lt;2 hips within World COACH. Risk prediction models were built with generalized linear mixed effects models (GLMM) and Random Forest (RF) models while adjusting for correlations within cohorts and individuals. The discriminative performance (AUC) of different model configurations and the linear versus non-linear approaches were compared through stratified 5-fold cross-validation. For each model configuration, predictions were made with and without cohort labels to assess heterogeneity between cohorts.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>In total, 29,110 hips without definite RHOA at baseline were included of which 5.0% developed RHOA within 4-8 years (mean age 63.7 (8.6) years, 75.5% female, mean BMI 27.5 (4.7) kg/m<sup>2</sup>). When comparing our uni-modal prediction model using only the clinical predictors (Model 1) to those with X-ray information added (Table 1), we observed a higher discriminative performance for the multi-modal models. Overall, including cohort information significantly improved model performance (p &lt; 0.05), and the RF models have a slightly but not significantly better performance than the GLMMs. Comparing the average effects of the significant predictors of the models including all predictors on incident RHOA (Figure 1), showed most differences between the GLMM and RF estimated effects at the maximum and minimum predictor values.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>By leveraging multi-modal data, we could improve our predictions of incident RHOA compared to clinical features alone. Our findings indicate that there would be a benefit for considering non-linear modeling approaches for this task in future work.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Osteoarthritis imaging\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100343\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Osteoarthritis imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772654125000832\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772654125000832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

髋关节骨关节炎(RHOA)是一种多因素疾病,早期发现个体风险具有挑战性,但对于及时干预和评估预防策略至关重要。利用来自不同队列的个体参与者数据整合多种不同数据模式的信息,可以增强RHOA早期阶段的预测建模。对模型可解释性的关注可以进一步确定临床相关的患者亚组和潜在的干预目标。目的建立一个多模态预测模型,以提高RHOA发病率预测模型相对于单独临床特征的性能,并研究预测效果和模型在相似人群中的普遍性。方法:我们汇集了来自全球髋关节骨关节炎预测合作组织(World COACH consortium)的9项前瞻性队列研究的个体参与者数据。所有研究包括标准化骨盆前后位、长肢和/或髋关节x线片,在基线和随访4-8年后评估RHOA。偶发性RHOA定义为在基线时没有明确的RHOA(分级<;2),但髋关节发生RHOA(分级≥2)。包括年龄、出生性别、体重指数(BMI)、吸烟状况、糖尿病和髋关节疼痛等临床预测因子的原始队列值被统一为一个一致的数据集。描述髋关节形态的x射线衍生预测因子,α角和外侧中心边缘角,使用Bonefinder®放置的自动地标点自动统一确定。此外,13种形状模态的值解释了85%的变化从一个基于地标的统计形状模型。该SSM建立在世界教练中所有基线RHOA等级<;2髋上。采用广义线性混合效应模型(GLMM)和随机森林模型(RF)建立风险预测模型,同时调整队列和个体之间的相关性。通过分层5重交叉验证比较了不同模型配置和线性与非线性方法的判别性能(AUC)。对于每种模型配置,分别使用和不使用队列标签进行预测,以评估队列之间的异质性。结果共纳入29,110例基线时无明确RHOA的髋关节,其中5.0%在4-8年内发生RHOA(平均年龄63.7(8.6)岁,75.5%为女性,平均BMI 27.5 (4.7) kg/m2)。将仅使用临床预测因子的单模态预测模型(模型1)与添加x射线信息的单模态预测模型(表1)进行比较时,我们观察到多模态模型具有更高的判别性能。总体而言,纳入队列信息显著提高了模型性能(p <;0.05), RF模型的性能略优于glmm模型,但不显著。比较包括所有预测因子在内的模型中显著预测因子对事件RHOA的平均影响(图1),显示GLMM和RF在最大和最小预测值上的估计效果差异最大。结论通过利用多模态数据,与单独的临床特征相比,我们可以提高对RHOA事件的预测。我们的研究结果表明,在未来的工作中考虑非线性建模方法将对这项任务有好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ADVANCING HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS PREDICTION: INSIGHTS FROM MULTI-MODAL PREDICTIVE MODELING WITH INDIVIDUAL PARTICIPANT DATA OF THE WORLD COACH CONSORTIUM

INTRODUCTION

Radiographic hip osteoarthritis (RHOA) is a multifactorial disease, making early detection of individuals at risk challenging yet essential for timely intervention and evaluation of preventive strategies. Integrating information on multiple different data modalities using individual participant data from diverse cohorts may enhance predictive modeling in the early stages of RHOA. A focus on model interpretability may further enable the identification of clinically relevant patient subgroups and potential intervention targets.

OBJECTIVE

Creating a multi-modal prediction model for improving the performance of RHOA incidence prediction models compared to clinical features alone, and investigating the estimated predictor effects and the generalizability of the models to similar populations.

METHODS

We pooled individual participant data from nine prospective cohort studies within the Worldwide Collaboration on OsteoArthritis prediCtion for the Hip (World COACH consortium). All studies included standardized anteroposterior pelvic, long-limb, and/or hip radiographs, assessed for RHOA at baseline and after 4–8 years of follow-up. Incident RHOA was defined as the development of RHOA (grade ≥2) in hips without definite RHOA at baseline (grade <2). The original cohort values of clinical predictors including age, birth-assigned sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, diabetes, and hip pain were harmonized into one consistent dataset. X-ray-derived predictors describing the hip morphology, the alpha angle and the lateral center edge angle, were automatically and uniformly determined using automated landmark points placed with Bonefinder®. Additionally, the values of 13 shape modes explaining 85% of the variation from a landmark-based statistical shape model were included. This SSM was built on all baseline RHOA grade <2 hips within World COACH. Risk prediction models were built with generalized linear mixed effects models (GLMM) and Random Forest (RF) models while adjusting for correlations within cohorts and individuals. The discriminative performance (AUC) of different model configurations and the linear versus non-linear approaches were compared through stratified 5-fold cross-validation. For each model configuration, predictions were made with and without cohort labels to assess heterogeneity between cohorts.

RESULTS

In total, 29,110 hips without definite RHOA at baseline were included of which 5.0% developed RHOA within 4-8 years (mean age 63.7 (8.6) years, 75.5% female, mean BMI 27.5 (4.7) kg/m2). When comparing our uni-modal prediction model using only the clinical predictors (Model 1) to those with X-ray information added (Table 1), we observed a higher discriminative performance for the multi-modal models. Overall, including cohort information significantly improved model performance (p < 0.05), and the RF models have a slightly but not significantly better performance than the GLMMs. Comparing the average effects of the significant predictors of the models including all predictors on incident RHOA (Figure 1), showed most differences between the GLMM and RF estimated effects at the maximum and minimum predictor values.

CONCLUSION

By leveraging multi-modal data, we could improve our predictions of incident RHOA compared to clinical features alone. Our findings indicate that there would be a benefit for considering non-linear modeling approaches for this task in future work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Osteoarthritis imaging
Osteoarthritis imaging Radiology and Imaging
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信