Wiebke Konerding , Julie Arenberg , Andrej Kral , Peter Baumhoff
{"title":"耳蜗健康改变豚鼠的极性效应和尖峰起始位点","authors":"Wiebke Konerding , Julie Arenberg , Andrej Kral , Peter Baumhoff","doi":"10.1016/j.heares.2025.109341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While cochlear implants (CIs) historically use cathodic-leading pulses for stimulation, studies in humans found that anodic-leading pulses are perceived louder than cathodic-leading ones. Modeling studies proposed that cathodic pulses excite the spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) more peripherally than anodic pulses. Thus, the anodic-benefit in human CI listeners is thought to reflect degenerated peripheral processes.</div><div>We used an animal model to test the contributions of peripheral dendrites and central axons of SGNs to polarity-effectiveness in CI stimulation. We mechanically lesioned the SGN (∼400 µm diameter; <em>n</em> = 18 cochleae) and introduced a 9-day degeneration time (<em>n</em> = 13 cochleae) to mimic human SGN degeneration. These lesions were compared to 20 control ears. We stimulated via a guinea-pig adjusted CI with symmetric, biphasic pulses (monopolar mode) of alternating leading-phase polarity (50µs/phase). Electrically-evoked compound action potential recordings to anodic- and cathodic-leading pulses were separated in the analysis to calculate the polarity effect.</div><div>We confirmed the cathodic-benefit for cochleae with healthy SGN (lower threshold, larger amplitudes, dynamic ranges, and steeper slopes). Longer latencies (50–70µs) to cathodic than anodic monophasic and biphasic pulses confirmed the proposed peripheral (cathodic) and central (anodic) spike-initiation sites. The cathodic benefit persisted after acute lesioning, which prolonged latencies for anodic- but not for cathodic-leading pulses – consistent with remaining structures being excited by both polarities. After chronic degeneration, the threshold showed polarity-specific changes, leading to an anodic-benefit.</div><div>The observed decline in cathodic-effectiveness with reduced neural health confirmed theoretical considerations for human CI users with stimulus-polarity and degeneration-type dependent changes in spike-initiation site.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12881,"journal":{"name":"Hearing Research","volume":"465 ","pages":"Article 109341"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cochlear health alters the polarity effect and spike-initiation sites in guinea pigs\",\"authors\":\"Wiebke Konerding , Julie Arenberg , Andrej Kral , Peter Baumhoff\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.heares.2025.109341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>While cochlear implants (CIs) historically use cathodic-leading pulses for stimulation, studies in humans found that anodic-leading pulses are perceived louder than cathodic-leading ones. Modeling studies proposed that cathodic pulses excite the spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) more peripherally than anodic pulses. Thus, the anodic-benefit in human CI listeners is thought to reflect degenerated peripheral processes.</div><div>We used an animal model to test the contributions of peripheral dendrites and central axons of SGNs to polarity-effectiveness in CI stimulation. We mechanically lesioned the SGN (∼400 µm diameter; <em>n</em> = 18 cochleae) and introduced a 9-day degeneration time (<em>n</em> = 13 cochleae) to mimic human SGN degeneration. These lesions were compared to 20 control ears. We stimulated via a guinea-pig adjusted CI with symmetric, biphasic pulses (monopolar mode) of alternating leading-phase polarity (50µs/phase). Electrically-evoked compound action potential recordings to anodic- and cathodic-leading pulses were separated in the analysis to calculate the polarity effect.</div><div>We confirmed the cathodic-benefit for cochleae with healthy SGN (lower threshold, larger amplitudes, dynamic ranges, and steeper slopes). Longer latencies (50–70µs) to cathodic than anodic monophasic and biphasic pulses confirmed the proposed peripheral (cathodic) and central (anodic) spike-initiation sites. The cathodic benefit persisted after acute lesioning, which prolonged latencies for anodic- but not for cathodic-leading pulses – consistent with remaining structures being excited by both polarities. After chronic degeneration, the threshold showed polarity-specific changes, leading to an anodic-benefit.</div><div>The observed decline in cathodic-effectiveness with reduced neural health confirmed theoretical considerations for human CI users with stimulus-polarity and degeneration-type dependent changes in spike-initiation site.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hearing Research\",\"volume\":\"465 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109341\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hearing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595525001595\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595525001595","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cochlear health alters the polarity effect and spike-initiation sites in guinea pigs
While cochlear implants (CIs) historically use cathodic-leading pulses for stimulation, studies in humans found that anodic-leading pulses are perceived louder than cathodic-leading ones. Modeling studies proposed that cathodic pulses excite the spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) more peripherally than anodic pulses. Thus, the anodic-benefit in human CI listeners is thought to reflect degenerated peripheral processes.
We used an animal model to test the contributions of peripheral dendrites and central axons of SGNs to polarity-effectiveness in CI stimulation. We mechanically lesioned the SGN (∼400 µm diameter; n = 18 cochleae) and introduced a 9-day degeneration time (n = 13 cochleae) to mimic human SGN degeneration. These lesions were compared to 20 control ears. We stimulated via a guinea-pig adjusted CI with symmetric, biphasic pulses (monopolar mode) of alternating leading-phase polarity (50µs/phase). Electrically-evoked compound action potential recordings to anodic- and cathodic-leading pulses were separated in the analysis to calculate the polarity effect.
We confirmed the cathodic-benefit for cochleae with healthy SGN (lower threshold, larger amplitudes, dynamic ranges, and steeper slopes). Longer latencies (50–70µs) to cathodic than anodic monophasic and biphasic pulses confirmed the proposed peripheral (cathodic) and central (anodic) spike-initiation sites. The cathodic benefit persisted after acute lesioning, which prolonged latencies for anodic- but not for cathodic-leading pulses – consistent with remaining structures being excited by both polarities. After chronic degeneration, the threshold showed polarity-specific changes, leading to an anodic-benefit.
The observed decline in cathodic-effectiveness with reduced neural health confirmed theoretical considerations for human CI users with stimulus-polarity and degeneration-type dependent changes in spike-initiation site.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the journal is to provide a forum for papers concerned with basic peripheral and central auditory mechanisms. Emphasis is on experimental and clinical studies, but theoretical and methodological papers will also be considered. The journal publishes original research papers, review and mini- review articles, rapid communications, method/protocol and perspective articles.
Papers submitted should deal with auditory anatomy, physiology, psychophysics, imaging, modeling and behavioural studies in animals and humans, as well as hearing aids and cochlear implants. Papers dealing with the vestibular system are also considered for publication. Papers on comparative aspects of hearing and on effects of drugs and environmental contaminants on hearing function will also be considered. Clinical papers will be accepted when they contribute to the understanding of normal and pathological hearing functions.