Fahad Zeed Alanezi PhD, MSc, RN , Robin Wagner DNP, APRN-CNS, CHSE , Benjamin Kelcey PhD, MA, BS , Caroline F. Morrison PhD, RN, CNL , Elaine Miller PhD, RN, CRRN, FAAN, FAHA
{"title":"冷热汇报对本科护生劳动能力的影响:一项随机对照试验","authors":"Fahad Zeed Alanezi PhD, MSc, RN , Robin Wagner DNP, APRN-CNS, CHSE , Benjamin Kelcey PhD, MA, BS , Caroline F. Morrison PhD, RN, CNL , Elaine Miller PhD, RN, CRRN, FAAN, FAHA","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2025.101768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Annually, there are over 290,000 in-hospital adult cardiac arrests in the United States. Basic Life Support (BLS) is essential in nursing simulation training, and effective debriefing enhances individual and team performance. “Hot” debriefing occurs shortly after simulation, while “Cold” debriefing happens after one-day. However, the optimal method for nursing students remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of hot versus cold debriefing on BLS competence and debriefing experience in undergraduate nursing students.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A randomized controlled trial with 44 BLS-certified nursing students assigned to Hot (<em>n</em> = 22) or Cold (<em>n</em> = 22) debriefing groups. BLS competence was assessed using the American Heart Association BLS competency checklist, and the Debriefing Experience Scale measured debriefing experience.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Both groups showed significant improvement in BLS competence from pre to post-test, with no statistical differences in competence or debriefing experience scores between methods.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While neither debriefing method proved superior, simulation with debriefing was beneficial. All students were BLS-certified, yet their mean baseline competence score was 10 out of 15, underscores the need for simulation-based BLS training in nursing curricula.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 101768"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of hot and cold debriefing on BLS competence in undergraduate nursing students: A randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Fahad Zeed Alanezi PhD, MSc, RN , Robin Wagner DNP, APRN-CNS, CHSE , Benjamin Kelcey PhD, MA, BS , Caroline F. Morrison PhD, RN, CNL , Elaine Miller PhD, RN, CRRN, FAAN, FAHA\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecns.2025.101768\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Annually, there are over 290,000 in-hospital adult cardiac arrests in the United States. Basic Life Support (BLS) is essential in nursing simulation training, and effective debriefing enhances individual and team performance. “Hot” debriefing occurs shortly after simulation, while “Cold” debriefing happens after one-day. However, the optimal method for nursing students remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of hot versus cold debriefing on BLS competence and debriefing experience in undergraduate nursing students.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A randomized controlled trial with 44 BLS-certified nursing students assigned to Hot (<em>n</em> = 22) or Cold (<em>n</em> = 22) debriefing groups. BLS competence was assessed using the American Heart Association BLS competency checklist, and the Debriefing Experience Scale measured debriefing experience.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Both groups showed significant improvement in BLS competence from pre to post-test, with no statistical differences in competence or debriefing experience scores between methods.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While neither debriefing method proved superior, simulation with debriefing was beneficial. All students were BLS-certified, yet their mean baseline competence score was 10 out of 15, underscores the need for simulation-based BLS training in nursing curricula.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Simulation in Nursing\",\"volume\":\"105 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101768\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Simulation in Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139925000854\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139925000854","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
The effect of hot and cold debriefing on BLS competence in undergraduate nursing students: A randomized controlled trial
Background
Annually, there are over 290,000 in-hospital adult cardiac arrests in the United States. Basic Life Support (BLS) is essential in nursing simulation training, and effective debriefing enhances individual and team performance. “Hot” debriefing occurs shortly after simulation, while “Cold” debriefing happens after one-day. However, the optimal method for nursing students remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of hot versus cold debriefing on BLS competence and debriefing experience in undergraduate nursing students.
Method
A randomized controlled trial with 44 BLS-certified nursing students assigned to Hot (n = 22) or Cold (n = 22) debriefing groups. BLS competence was assessed using the American Heart Association BLS competency checklist, and the Debriefing Experience Scale measured debriefing experience.
Results
Both groups showed significant improvement in BLS competence from pre to post-test, with no statistical differences in competence or debriefing experience scores between methods.
Conclusion
While neither debriefing method proved superior, simulation with debriefing was beneficial. All students were BLS-certified, yet their mean baseline competence score was 10 out of 15, underscores the need for simulation-based BLS training in nursing curricula.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation.
We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria:
Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation
Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation
Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation
Leadership for simulation
Simulation operations
Clinical and academic uses of simulation.