在印度,谁更喜欢买改良的经期产品?列表实验证据

IF 1.6 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Olivia Sarkar , Arijita Dutta
{"title":"在印度,谁更喜欢买改良的经期产品?列表实验证据","authors":"Olivia Sarkar ,&nbsp;Arijita Dutta","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2025.102406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the backdrop of significantly high reporting of usage of hygienic period products by Indian women in different surveys including National Family Health Survey 5 (2019–21), the current paper attempts to elicit young married girls’ attitude towards spending on sanitary napkins. This might be important because menstrual management in low-and-medium-income countries are often shrouded by shame and sense of impurity, creating a background of Social Desirability Bias (SDB). This study employs List Experiment (LE) technique alongside direct questions in a survey of 1200 young women from Bihar and West Bengal to present a new measurement of preference for marketed sanitary product and detect SDB in reporting in direct question. The results show strong presence of SDB, particularly among women belonging to Islamic faith (32 %), general castes (30 %) and with more than primary education (31 %). Correlates of menstrual spending with true responses provide new insights into product choice, revealing that the motivation is driven more by the desire to conceal menstruation than hygiene concerns. Post-marital intra-household agency and access to open discussions about menstruation with all genders assume a crucial role in understanding the need for spending on period products, drawing policy highlights on inclusive IEC and initiatives to discard the menstrual disgrace.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 102406"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who prefers to buy improved period products in India? Evidence from list experiment\",\"authors\":\"Olivia Sarkar ,&nbsp;Arijita Dutta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socec.2025.102406\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In the backdrop of significantly high reporting of usage of hygienic period products by Indian women in different surveys including National Family Health Survey 5 (2019–21), the current paper attempts to elicit young married girls’ attitude towards spending on sanitary napkins. This might be important because menstrual management in low-and-medium-income countries are often shrouded by shame and sense of impurity, creating a background of Social Desirability Bias (SDB). This study employs List Experiment (LE) technique alongside direct questions in a survey of 1200 young women from Bihar and West Bengal to present a new measurement of preference for marketed sanitary product and detect SDB in reporting in direct question. The results show strong presence of SDB, particularly among women belonging to Islamic faith (32 %), general castes (30 %) and with more than primary education (31 %). Correlates of menstrual spending with true responses provide new insights into product choice, revealing that the motivation is driven more by the desire to conceal menstruation than hygiene concerns. Post-marital intra-household agency and access to open discussions about menstruation with all genders assume a crucial role in understanding the need for spending on period products, drawing policy highlights on inclusive IEC and initiatives to discard the menstrual disgrace.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics\",\"volume\":\"117 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102406\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804325000722\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804325000722","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在包括2019-21年全国家庭健康调查5 (National Family Health Survey 5)在内的不同调查中,印度妇女使用卫生用品的报告比例很高。在这种背景下,本论文试图引出年轻已婚女孩对卫生巾消费的态度。这一点可能很重要,因为在中低收入国家,经期管理往往被羞耻和不洁感所笼罩,形成了社会可取性偏见(SDB)的背景。本研究采用清单实验法(LE)结合直接提问法对来自比哈尔邦和西孟加拉邦的1200名年轻女性进行了调查,提出了一种新的对市场卫生产品偏好的测量方法,并在直接提问中检测了SDB。结果显示,SDB的存在感很强,特别是在伊斯兰教(32%)、一般种姓(30%)和小学以上教育程度(31%)的女性中。月经消费与真实反应的相关性为产品选择提供了新的见解,揭示了动机更多地是由隐藏月经的愿望驱动,而不是卫生问题。婚后家庭内部机构和与所有性别公开讨论月经问题的机会,在理解购买经期产品的需求方面发挥着至关重要的作用,并将政策重点放在包容性的信息、教育和宣传以及消除月经耻辱的举措上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Who prefers to buy improved period products in India? Evidence from list experiment
In the backdrop of significantly high reporting of usage of hygienic period products by Indian women in different surveys including National Family Health Survey 5 (2019–21), the current paper attempts to elicit young married girls’ attitude towards spending on sanitary napkins. This might be important because menstrual management in low-and-medium-income countries are often shrouded by shame and sense of impurity, creating a background of Social Desirability Bias (SDB). This study employs List Experiment (LE) technique alongside direct questions in a survey of 1200 young women from Bihar and West Bengal to present a new measurement of preference for marketed sanitary product and detect SDB in reporting in direct question. The results show strong presence of SDB, particularly among women belonging to Islamic faith (32 %), general castes (30 %) and with more than primary education (31 %). Correlates of menstrual spending with true responses provide new insights into product choice, revealing that the motivation is driven more by the desire to conceal menstruation than hygiene concerns. Post-marital intra-household agency and access to open discussions about menstruation with all genders assume a crucial role in understanding the need for spending on period products, drawing policy highlights on inclusive IEC and initiatives to discard the menstrual disgrace.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
113
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly the Journal of Socio-Economics) welcomes submissions that deal with various economic topics but also involve issues that are related to other social sciences, especially psychology, or use experimental methods of inquiry. Thus, contributions in behavioral economics, experimental economics, economic psychology, and judgment and decision making are especially welcome. The journal is open to different research methodologies, as long as they are relevant to the topic and employed rigorously. Possible methodologies include, for example, experiments, surveys, empirical work, theoretical models, meta-analyses, case studies, and simulation-based analyses. Literature reviews that integrate findings from many studies are also welcome, but they should synthesize the literature in a useful manner and provide substantial contribution beyond what the reader could get by simply reading the abstracts of the cited papers. In empirical work, it is important that the results are not only statistically significant but also economically significant. A high contribution-to-length ratio is expected from published articles and therefore papers should not be unnecessarily long, and short articles are welcome. Articles should be written in a manner that is intelligible to our generalist readership. Book reviews are generally solicited but occasionally unsolicited reviews will also be published. Contact the Book Review Editor for related inquiries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信