M.W. Brejnebøl , T. Haugegaard , R. Christensen , H. Gudbergsen , H. Bliddal , P. Hansen , L.E. Kristensen , C.T. Nielsen , C.L. Daugaard , J.U. Nybing , M. Henriksen , M. Boesen
{"title":"减肥和胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂对膝关节骨关节炎结构变化的影响:随机、安慰剂对照减肥试验的二次分析","authors":"M.W. Brejnebøl , T. Haugegaard , R. Christensen , H. Gudbergsen , H. Bliddal , P. Hansen , L.E. Kristensen , C.T. Nielsen , C.L. Daugaard , J.U. Nybing , M. Henriksen , M. Boesen","doi":"10.1016/j.ostima.2025.100280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>To compare the effect of weight loss and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) (liraglutide), relative to weight loss and placebo, on structural knee osteoarthritis.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>This secondary analysis followed a superiority framework of data from the LOSEIT trial, a randomised, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial. Participants aged 18 to 74 years with overweight (BMI ≥27 kg/m²), symptomatic and early-to-moderate radiographic knee OA were recruited. They underwent 8-week intensive diet intervention followed by randomisation to receive a GLP-1RA (liraglutide 3 mg/d) or placebo for 52 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in radiographic medial minimal joint space width (mmJSW). Analyses were conducted on the intention-to-treat population.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>From November 14, 2016, through September 12, 2017, 156 participants were randomly assigned to GLP-1RA (n = 80) or to placebo (n = 76). As reported in the primary analysis of the data, the GLP-1RA group lost more weight than the placebo group (mean difference, - 3.21 kg, 95%CI: - 6.39 to - 0.03; P=0.050). The GLP-1RA group demonstrated an increase in mean mmJSW of 0.22 mm (95%CI: 0.06 to 0.38) while the placebo group did not change (0.07 mm, 95%CI: - 0.11 to 0.25). No evidence of a difference in mean mmJSW was observed between groups (0.15 mm, 95%CI: -0.06 to 0.36; P=0.17).</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>While the results indicate a potentially favourable effect on mmJSW within the GLP-1RA group, the observed difference in structural knee OA changes on radiographs compared to placebo did not reach statistical significance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74378,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis imaging","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100280"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE EFFECT OF WEIGHT LOSS AND GLUCAGON-LIKE PEPTIDE-1 RECEPTOR AGONIST ON STRUCTURAL CHANGES IN KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS: SECONDARY ANALYSIS OF THE RANDOMISED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED LOSEIT TRIAL\",\"authors\":\"M.W. Brejnebøl , T. Haugegaard , R. Christensen , H. Gudbergsen , H. Bliddal , P. Hansen , L.E. Kristensen , C.T. Nielsen , C.L. Daugaard , J.U. Nybing , M. Henriksen , M. Boesen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ostima.2025.100280\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>To compare the effect of weight loss and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) (liraglutide), relative to weight loss and placebo, on structural knee osteoarthritis.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>This secondary analysis followed a superiority framework of data from the LOSEIT trial, a randomised, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial. Participants aged 18 to 74 years with overweight (BMI ≥27 kg/m²), symptomatic and early-to-moderate radiographic knee OA were recruited. They underwent 8-week intensive diet intervention followed by randomisation to receive a GLP-1RA (liraglutide 3 mg/d) or placebo for 52 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in radiographic medial minimal joint space width (mmJSW). Analyses were conducted on the intention-to-treat population.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>From November 14, 2016, through September 12, 2017, 156 participants were randomly assigned to GLP-1RA (n = 80) or to placebo (n = 76). As reported in the primary analysis of the data, the GLP-1RA group lost more weight than the placebo group (mean difference, - 3.21 kg, 95%CI: - 6.39 to - 0.03; P=0.050). The GLP-1RA group demonstrated an increase in mean mmJSW of 0.22 mm (95%CI: 0.06 to 0.38) while the placebo group did not change (0.07 mm, 95%CI: - 0.11 to 0.25). No evidence of a difference in mean mmJSW was observed between groups (0.15 mm, 95%CI: -0.06 to 0.36; P=0.17).</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>While the results indicate a potentially favourable effect on mmJSW within the GLP-1RA group, the observed difference in structural knee OA changes on radiographs compared to placebo did not reach statistical significance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Osteoarthritis imaging\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100280\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Osteoarthritis imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772654125000200\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772654125000200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的比较减肥和胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)(利拉鲁肽)相对于减肥和安慰剂对结构性膝骨关节炎的影响。方法本二次分析采用LOSEIT试验的优势数据框架,该试验是一项随机、平行组、安慰剂对照试验。参与者年龄在18至74岁之间,体重超重(BMI≥27 kg/m²),有症状和早期至中度膝关节炎。他们接受了8周的强化饮食干预,随后随机分配接受GLP-1RA(利拉鲁肽3mg /d)或安慰剂52周。主要观察指标是影像学上内侧最小关节间隙宽度(mmJSW)的变化。对意向治疗人群进行了分析。从2016年11月14日至2017年9月12日,156名参与者被随机分配到GLP-1RA组(n = 80)或安慰剂组(n = 76)。在数据的初步分析中,GLP-1RA组比安慰剂组减轻了更多的体重(平均差,- 3.21 kg, 95%CI: - 6.39至- 0.03;P = 0.050)。GLP-1RA组显示平均mmJSW增加0.22 mm (95%CI: 0.06至0.38),而安慰剂组没有变化(0.07 mm, 95%CI: - 0.11至0.25)。没有证据表明两组之间的平均mmJSW有差异(0.15 mm, 95%CI: -0.06 ~ 0.36;P = 0.17)。结论:虽然结果表明GLP-1RA组对mmJSW有潜在的有利影响,但与安慰剂相比,在x线片上观察到的膝关节OA结构性变化的差异没有达到统计学意义。
THE EFFECT OF WEIGHT LOSS AND GLUCAGON-LIKE PEPTIDE-1 RECEPTOR AGONIST ON STRUCTURAL CHANGES IN KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS: SECONDARY ANALYSIS OF THE RANDOMISED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED LOSEIT TRIAL
OBJECTIVE
To compare the effect of weight loss and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) (liraglutide), relative to weight loss and placebo, on structural knee osteoarthritis.
METHODS
This secondary analysis followed a superiority framework of data from the LOSEIT trial, a randomised, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial. Participants aged 18 to 74 years with overweight (BMI ≥27 kg/m²), symptomatic and early-to-moderate radiographic knee OA were recruited. They underwent 8-week intensive diet intervention followed by randomisation to receive a GLP-1RA (liraglutide 3 mg/d) or placebo for 52 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in radiographic medial minimal joint space width (mmJSW). Analyses were conducted on the intention-to-treat population.
RESULTS
From November 14, 2016, through September 12, 2017, 156 participants were randomly assigned to GLP-1RA (n = 80) or to placebo (n = 76). As reported in the primary analysis of the data, the GLP-1RA group lost more weight than the placebo group (mean difference, - 3.21 kg, 95%CI: - 6.39 to - 0.03; P=0.050). The GLP-1RA group demonstrated an increase in mean mmJSW of 0.22 mm (95%CI: 0.06 to 0.38) while the placebo group did not change (0.07 mm, 95%CI: - 0.11 to 0.25). No evidence of a difference in mean mmJSW was observed between groups (0.15 mm, 95%CI: -0.06 to 0.36; P=0.17).
CONCLUSION
While the results indicate a potentially favourable effect on mmJSW within the GLP-1RA group, the observed difference in structural knee OA changes on radiographs compared to placebo did not reach statistical significance.