Ashraf Khalil , Reeti Agarwal , Muhammad Zafar Yaqub , Armando Papa
{"title":"解开人力资源中的人工智能生产力悖论:跨组织层面的定性洞察","authors":"Ashraf Khalil , Reeti Agarwal , Muhammad Zafar Yaqub , Armando Papa","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Artificial Intelligence (AI) is widely expected to boost productivity and economic growth. As with other technological innovations, a productivity paradox emerges, stating that productivity falls upon its introduction. Therefore, while organizations consistently augment their investments in AI, they might fall short of significant productivity improvements. This study delves into this productivity paradox using a longitudinal qualitative research design with two waves of data collection. We explored four critical themes: AI’s evolving role in organizations, its tangible effects on HR productivity, the underlying reasons behind the productivity paradox, and its multifaceted impact on the employee, team, and organizational levels. Our findings reveal compelling insights into why increased AI investments may not always translate into immediate productivity gains. In addition to providing a framework outlining the relationship between AI and the productivity paradox in HR operations, the findings offer insightful information that can be extremely helpful to industry practitioners.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"199 ","pages":"Article 115456"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unlocking the AI-Productivity paradox in HR: Qualitative insights across organizational levels\",\"authors\":\"Ashraf Khalil , Reeti Agarwal , Muhammad Zafar Yaqub , Armando Papa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115456\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Artificial Intelligence (AI) is widely expected to boost productivity and economic growth. As with other technological innovations, a productivity paradox emerges, stating that productivity falls upon its introduction. Therefore, while organizations consistently augment their investments in AI, they might fall short of significant productivity improvements. This study delves into this productivity paradox using a longitudinal qualitative research design with two waves of data collection. We explored four critical themes: AI’s evolving role in organizations, its tangible effects on HR productivity, the underlying reasons behind the productivity paradox, and its multifaceted impact on the employee, team, and organizational levels. Our findings reveal compelling insights into why increased AI investments may not always translate into immediate productivity gains. In addition to providing a framework outlining the relationship between AI and the productivity paradox in HR operations, the findings offer insightful information that can be extremely helpful to industry practitioners.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"volume\":\"199 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115456\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325002796\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325002796","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Unlocking the AI-Productivity paradox in HR: Qualitative insights across organizational levels
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is widely expected to boost productivity and economic growth. As with other technological innovations, a productivity paradox emerges, stating that productivity falls upon its introduction. Therefore, while organizations consistently augment their investments in AI, they might fall short of significant productivity improvements. This study delves into this productivity paradox using a longitudinal qualitative research design with two waves of data collection. We explored four critical themes: AI’s evolving role in organizations, its tangible effects on HR productivity, the underlying reasons behind the productivity paradox, and its multifaceted impact on the employee, team, and organizational levels. Our findings reveal compelling insights into why increased AI investments may not always translate into immediate productivity gains. In addition to providing a framework outlining the relationship between AI and the productivity paradox in HR operations, the findings offer insightful information that can be extremely helpful to industry practitioners.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.