Jingzhe Guo , Yuxia Wang , Ya Li , Pan Zhang , Lifa Zhou
{"title":"利用二维地层水电阻率变量进行低对比度储层测井识别的机器学习可视化表示","authors":"Jingzhe Guo , Yuxia Wang , Ya Li , Pan Zhang , Lifa Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2025.107518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Owing to their similar resistivity to water layers, low-contrast pay (LCP) zones may be misinterpreted. While machine learning (ML) methods offer advantages in identifying LCP zones over conventional approaches, their interpretability remains a challenge. This study employs novel approaches to construct sensitive parameters and develop visual representation models, aiming to achieve accurate identification and enhanced model interpretability of Jurassic LCPs in the southwestern Ordos Basin. The key points can be summarized as follows: 1) True and apparent formation water resistivities (FWRs) were calculated from conventional parameters. Based on FWR spectra, the innovative 2D FWR variables were constructed, thereby enhancing distinctions among production-layer types. 2) Nine models were trained using three base learners—support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), and artificial neural network (ANN)—with three sets of input features: conventional parameters, true and apparent FWRs, and 2D FWR variables. The ANN model performed best with an F<sub>1</sub>-score of 95.55 % on the testing set when using 2D FWR variables. 3) Cross-plots of 2D FWR variables visually represent model performance. The ANN model's superior performance is attributed to its hidden layer neurons generating four demarcation lines that finely divide the cross-plot into nine zones for classification. In contrast, the SVM model divides the cross-plot into three zones using two demarcation lines, and the DT model's stepped demarcation lines lead to overfitting. The novelties can be summarized as follows: 1) During domain-specific feature transformation, the introduction of 2D FWR variables integrates both morphological information from logging curves and the differences between true and apparent FWRs. 2) Application of 2D FWR variables provides visual insights into ML model principles and performances, thereby facilitating a clearer understanding.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18189,"journal":{"name":"Marine and Petroleum Geology","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 107518"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visual representation of machine learning for low-contrast pay logging identification using 2D formation water resistivity variables\",\"authors\":\"Jingzhe Guo , Yuxia Wang , Ya Li , Pan Zhang , Lifa Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2025.107518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Owing to their similar resistivity to water layers, low-contrast pay (LCP) zones may be misinterpreted. While machine learning (ML) methods offer advantages in identifying LCP zones over conventional approaches, their interpretability remains a challenge. This study employs novel approaches to construct sensitive parameters and develop visual representation models, aiming to achieve accurate identification and enhanced model interpretability of Jurassic LCPs in the southwestern Ordos Basin. The key points can be summarized as follows: 1) True and apparent formation water resistivities (FWRs) were calculated from conventional parameters. Based on FWR spectra, the innovative 2D FWR variables were constructed, thereby enhancing distinctions among production-layer types. 2) Nine models were trained using three base learners—support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), and artificial neural network (ANN)—with three sets of input features: conventional parameters, true and apparent FWRs, and 2D FWR variables. The ANN model performed best with an F<sub>1</sub>-score of 95.55 % on the testing set when using 2D FWR variables. 3) Cross-plots of 2D FWR variables visually represent model performance. The ANN model's superior performance is attributed to its hidden layer neurons generating four demarcation lines that finely divide the cross-plot into nine zones for classification. In contrast, the SVM model divides the cross-plot into three zones using two demarcation lines, and the DT model's stepped demarcation lines lead to overfitting. The novelties can be summarized as follows: 1) During domain-specific feature transformation, the introduction of 2D FWR variables integrates both morphological information from logging curves and the differences between true and apparent FWRs. 2) Application of 2D FWR variables provides visual insights into ML model principles and performances, thereby facilitating a clearer understanding.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marine and Petroleum Geology\",\"volume\":\"181 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107518\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marine and Petroleum Geology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264817225002351\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine and Petroleum Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264817225002351","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Visual representation of machine learning for low-contrast pay logging identification using 2D formation water resistivity variables
Owing to their similar resistivity to water layers, low-contrast pay (LCP) zones may be misinterpreted. While machine learning (ML) methods offer advantages in identifying LCP zones over conventional approaches, their interpretability remains a challenge. This study employs novel approaches to construct sensitive parameters and develop visual representation models, aiming to achieve accurate identification and enhanced model interpretability of Jurassic LCPs in the southwestern Ordos Basin. The key points can be summarized as follows: 1) True and apparent formation water resistivities (FWRs) were calculated from conventional parameters. Based on FWR spectra, the innovative 2D FWR variables were constructed, thereby enhancing distinctions among production-layer types. 2) Nine models were trained using three base learners—support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), and artificial neural network (ANN)—with three sets of input features: conventional parameters, true and apparent FWRs, and 2D FWR variables. The ANN model performed best with an F1-score of 95.55 % on the testing set when using 2D FWR variables. 3) Cross-plots of 2D FWR variables visually represent model performance. The ANN model's superior performance is attributed to its hidden layer neurons generating four demarcation lines that finely divide the cross-plot into nine zones for classification. In contrast, the SVM model divides the cross-plot into three zones using two demarcation lines, and the DT model's stepped demarcation lines lead to overfitting. The novelties can be summarized as follows: 1) During domain-specific feature transformation, the introduction of 2D FWR variables integrates both morphological information from logging curves and the differences between true and apparent FWRs. 2) Application of 2D FWR variables provides visual insights into ML model principles and performances, thereby facilitating a clearer understanding.
期刊介绍:
Marine and Petroleum Geology is the pre-eminent international forum for the exchange of multidisciplinary concepts, interpretations and techniques for all concerned with marine and petroleum geology in industry, government and academia. Rapid bimonthly publication allows early communications of papers or short communications to the geoscience community.
Marine and Petroleum Geology is essential reading for geologists, geophysicists and explorationists in industry, government and academia working in the following areas: marine geology; basin analysis and evaluation; organic geochemistry; reserve/resource estimation; seismic stratigraphy; thermal models of basic evolution; sedimentary geology; continental margins; geophysical interpretation; structural geology/tectonics; formation evaluation techniques; well logging.