社会信用示范城市能否减少城市碳排放?

IF 4.8 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Yueyue He , Xueping Ning
{"title":"社会信用示范城市能否减少城市碳排放?","authors":"Yueyue He ,&nbsp;Xueping Ning","doi":"10.1016/j.iref.2025.104341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Formal environmental regulations in China, typically imposed through top-down mechanisms, often face enforcement challenges and inefficiencies. In contrast, informal institutions such as social credit systems offer alternative approaches to managing urban environmental issues. This study investigates whether the establishment of Social Credit System Demonstration Cities (SCSDCC) can lower urban carbon emission intensity (CEI). Using panel data from 283 Chinese cities and a multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) framework, we find that SCSDCC significantly reduce CEI, with an average reduction of 18.80 % compared to non-demonstration cities. The findings remain robust after accounting for other concurrent policy pilots and using urban elevation as an instrumental variable to address endogeneity. The results suggest that the SCSDCC promote emission reductions by improving energy efficiency, encouraging technological innovation, and supporting economies of scale. Moreover, the policy generates spatial spillovers, reducing CEI in neighboring areas. The effect is more pronounced in small and medium-sized cities, northern regions, non-resource-based economies, and cities without overlapping pilot programs. These results underscore the environmental value of social credit systems as informal regulatory tools in urban carbon governance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14444,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Economics & Finance","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 104341"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can social credit demonstration cities reduce urban carbon emissions?\",\"authors\":\"Yueyue He ,&nbsp;Xueping Ning\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iref.2025.104341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Formal environmental regulations in China, typically imposed through top-down mechanisms, often face enforcement challenges and inefficiencies. In contrast, informal institutions such as social credit systems offer alternative approaches to managing urban environmental issues. This study investigates whether the establishment of Social Credit System Demonstration Cities (SCSDCC) can lower urban carbon emission intensity (CEI). Using panel data from 283 Chinese cities and a multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) framework, we find that SCSDCC significantly reduce CEI, with an average reduction of 18.80 % compared to non-demonstration cities. The findings remain robust after accounting for other concurrent policy pilots and using urban elevation as an instrumental variable to address endogeneity. The results suggest that the SCSDCC promote emission reductions by improving energy efficiency, encouraging technological innovation, and supporting economies of scale. Moreover, the policy generates spatial spillovers, reducing CEI in neighboring areas. The effect is more pronounced in small and medium-sized cities, northern regions, non-resource-based economies, and cities without overlapping pilot programs. These results underscore the environmental value of social credit systems as informal regulatory tools in urban carbon governance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Economics & Finance\",\"volume\":\"102 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104341\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Economics & Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056025005040\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Economics & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056025005040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在中国,正式的环境法规通常是通过自上而下的机制实施的,常常面临执行上的挑战和效率低下。相比之下,社会信用体系等非正式机构为管理城市环境问题提供了替代办法。本研究探讨建立社会信用体系示范城市是否能降低城市碳排放强度。利用283个中国城市的面板数据和多期差中差(DID)框架,我们发现SCSDCC显著降低了CEI,与非示范城市相比,平均降低了18.80%。在考虑了其他同时进行的政策试点并使用城市海拔作为工具变量来解决内生性问题后,研究结果仍然稳健。研究结果表明,SCSDCC通过提高能源效率、鼓励技术创新和支持规模经济来促进减排。此外,该政策还会产生空间溢出效应,降低周边地区的CEI。在中小城市、北方地区、非资源型经济体和试点项目不重叠的城市,效果更为明显。这些结果强调了社会信用体系作为城市碳治理非正式监管工具的环境价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can social credit demonstration cities reduce urban carbon emissions?
Formal environmental regulations in China, typically imposed through top-down mechanisms, often face enforcement challenges and inefficiencies. In contrast, informal institutions such as social credit systems offer alternative approaches to managing urban environmental issues. This study investigates whether the establishment of Social Credit System Demonstration Cities (SCSDCC) can lower urban carbon emission intensity (CEI). Using panel data from 283 Chinese cities and a multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) framework, we find that SCSDCC significantly reduce CEI, with an average reduction of 18.80 % compared to non-demonstration cities. The findings remain robust after accounting for other concurrent policy pilots and using urban elevation as an instrumental variable to address endogeneity. The results suggest that the SCSDCC promote emission reductions by improving energy efficiency, encouraging technological innovation, and supporting economies of scale. Moreover, the policy generates spatial spillovers, reducing CEI in neighboring areas. The effect is more pronounced in small and medium-sized cities, northern regions, non-resource-based economies, and cities without overlapping pilot programs. These results underscore the environmental value of social credit systems as informal regulatory tools in urban carbon governance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.20%
发文量
253
期刊介绍: The International Review of Economics & Finance (IREF) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of high quality theoretical and empirical articles in all areas of international economics, macroeconomics and financial economics. Contributions that facilitate the communications between the real and the financial sectors of the economy are of particular interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信