《英格兰和威尔士精神健康法案(2025年)》:专业人士和护理人员的共识声明,总结了对自闭症和学习障碍拟议变化的担忧和意外后果

Peter Beazley, Regi T. Alexander, John L. Taylor, Bharat Velani, Helen Dewson, Rohit Shankar, Samuel J. Tromans, Mahesh M. Odiyoor, Angela Hassiotis, Ashok Roy, Iain McKinnon, Asif Zia, Andre Strydom, Patrick Keown, Bhathika Perera, Mohsin Khan, Jane McCarthy, Michael Butler, Verity Chester, Lucy Fitton, Kenny Chiu, Andrea Bew, Tadhgh Lane, Tricia Gay, Bob Gay
{"title":"《英格兰和威尔士精神健康法案(2025年)》:专业人士和护理人员的共识声明,总结了对自闭症和学习障碍拟议变化的担忧和意外后果","authors":"Peter Beazley, Regi T. Alexander, John L. Taylor, Bharat Velani, Helen Dewson, Rohit Shankar, Samuel J. Tromans, Mahesh M. Odiyoor, Angela Hassiotis, Ashok Roy, Iain McKinnon, Asif Zia, Andre Strydom, Patrick Keown, Bhathika Perera, Mohsin Khan, Jane McCarthy, Michael Butler, Verity Chester, Lucy Fitton, Kenny Chiu, Andrea Bew, Tadhgh Lane, Tricia Gay, Bob Gay","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2025.10324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Mental Health Bill, 2025, proposes to remove autism and learning disability from the scope of Section 3 of the Mental Health Act, 1983 (MHA). The present article represents a professional and carer consensus statement that raises concerns and identifies probable unintended consequences if this proposal becomes law. Our concerns relate to the lack of clear mandate for such proposals, conceptual inconsistency when considering other conditions that might give rise to a need for detention and the inconsistency in applying such changes to Part II of the MHA but not Part III. If the proposed changes become law, we anticipate that detentions would instead occur under the less safeguarded Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards framework, and that unmanaged risks will eventuate in behavioural consequences that will lead to more autistic people or those with a learning disability being sent to prison. Additionally, there is a concern that the proposed definitional breadth of autism and learning disability gives rise to a risk that people with other conditions may unintentionally be unable to be detained. We strongly urge the UK Parliament to amend this portion of the Bill prior to it becoming law.</p>","PeriodicalId":22495,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"653 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Mental Health Bill (2025) for England and Wales: professional and carer consensus statement summarising concerns and unintended consequences from proposed changes to autism and learning disability\",\"authors\":\"Peter Beazley, Regi T. Alexander, John L. Taylor, Bharat Velani, Helen Dewson, Rohit Shankar, Samuel J. Tromans, Mahesh M. Odiyoor, Angela Hassiotis, Ashok Roy, Iain McKinnon, Asif Zia, Andre Strydom, Patrick Keown, Bhathika Perera, Mohsin Khan, Jane McCarthy, Michael Butler, Verity Chester, Lucy Fitton, Kenny Chiu, Andrea Bew, Tadhgh Lane, Tricia Gay, Bob Gay\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/bjp.2025.10324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Mental Health Bill, 2025, proposes to remove autism and learning disability from the scope of Section 3 of the Mental Health Act, 1983 (MHA). The present article represents a professional and carer consensus statement that raises concerns and identifies probable unintended consequences if this proposal becomes law. Our concerns relate to the lack of clear mandate for such proposals, conceptual inconsistency when considering other conditions that might give rise to a need for detention and the inconsistency in applying such changes to Part II of the MHA but not Part III. If the proposed changes become law, we anticipate that detentions would instead occur under the less safeguarded Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards framework, and that unmanaged risks will eventuate in behavioural consequences that will lead to more autistic people or those with a learning disability being sent to prison. Additionally, there is a concern that the proposed definitional breadth of autism and learning disability gives rise to a risk that people with other conditions may unintentionally be unable to be detained. We strongly urge the UK Parliament to amend this portion of the Bill prior to it becoming law.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The British Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"653 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The British Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2025.10324\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2025.10324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《2025年精神卫生法》建议将自闭症和学习障碍从1983年《精神卫生法》(MHA)第3节的范围中删除。本文代表了一个专业人士和护理人员的共识声明,提出了关注,并确定了如果该提案成为法律可能产生的意想不到的后果。我们关注的是,这些建议缺乏明确的授权,在考虑可能导致需要拘留的其他条件时,概念上的不一致,以及在将这些变化应用于MHA的第二部分而不是第三部分时的不一致。如果提议的修改成为法律,我们预计拘留将在保障较少的剥夺自由保障框架下发生,而不受管理的风险将最终导致行为后果,导致更多的自闭症患者或有学习障碍的人被送进监狱。此外,有人担心,拟议的自闭症和学习障碍的定义范围可能会导致有其他情况的人可能无意中无法被拘留。我们强烈敦促英国议会在该法案成为法律之前修改该部分内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Mental Health Bill (2025) for England and Wales: professional and carer consensus statement summarising concerns and unintended consequences from proposed changes to autism and learning disability

The Mental Health Bill, 2025, proposes to remove autism and learning disability from the scope of Section 3 of the Mental Health Act, 1983 (MHA). The present article represents a professional and carer consensus statement that raises concerns and identifies probable unintended consequences if this proposal becomes law. Our concerns relate to the lack of clear mandate for such proposals, conceptual inconsistency when considering other conditions that might give rise to a need for detention and the inconsistency in applying such changes to Part II of the MHA but not Part III. If the proposed changes become law, we anticipate that detentions would instead occur under the less safeguarded Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards framework, and that unmanaged risks will eventuate in behavioural consequences that will lead to more autistic people or those with a learning disability being sent to prison. Additionally, there is a concern that the proposed definitional breadth of autism and learning disability gives rise to a risk that people with other conditions may unintentionally be unable to be detained. We strongly urge the UK Parliament to amend this portion of the Bill prior to it becoming law.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信