女性跑步者的盆底负荷是否与跑步后盆底形态或功能的改变有关?

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Marie‐Eve Berube, Stefan Niederauer, Ryan Graham, Robert Hitchcock, Linda McLean
{"title":"女性跑步者的盆底负荷是否与跑步后盆底形态或功能的改变有关?","authors":"Marie‐Eve Berube, Stefan Niederauer, Ryan Graham, Robert Hitchcock, Linda McLean","doi":"10.1111/bju.16842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectivesTo investigate whether, among female runners, transient changes in pelvic floor morphometry, pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function, or pad weight gain observed after a standardised running protocol are associated with the exposure of the pelvic floor to loading during the run.MethodsAdult female runners with (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 19) and without (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 19) running‐induced stress urinary incontinence (RI‐SUI) completed a 37‐min treadmill‐based running protocol with a pressure sensor placed in the posterior fornix of the vagina and a triaxial accelerometer adhered to the pelvis, and an incontinence pad adhered to their undergarment. Pelvic morphometry and PFM function were assessed before and after the run using transperineal ultrasonography and intra‐vaginal dynamometry. Urine leakage volume was estimated based on incontinence pad weight gain. Separate linear regression models were used to evaluate the associations between variables representative of pelvic floor load exposure (posterior fornix sensor pressure [PFSP] and pelvic accelerations) and changes in pelvic morphometry, PFM function, and incontinence pad weight observed after the run.ResultsAfter the run, the levator hiatus was larger and the bladder neck sat lower in the pelvis, but there were no significant differences in PFM active or passive forces measured using dynamometry. These changes were not different between those with and those without RI‐SUI. Higher pelvic accelerations were associated with greater reductions in passive PFM stiffness after the run (<jats:italic>R</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 20%–27%), but not with changes in pelvic morphometry. No associations were found between any measures of pelvic floor load exposure and changes in PFM force‐generating capacity. Among runners with RI‐SUI, greater pad weight gain occurred among those who ran with slower vector accelerations (<jats:italic>R</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 0.27).ConclusionThe magnitude of pelvic floor loading experienced during running does not appear to influence the transient loss in static pelvic organ support observed after running nor urine leakage volume.","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is pelvic floor loading in female runners associated with post‐run changes in pelvic floor morphometry or function?\",\"authors\":\"Marie‐Eve Berube, Stefan Niederauer, Ryan Graham, Robert Hitchcock, Linda McLean\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bju.16842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ObjectivesTo investigate whether, among female runners, transient changes in pelvic floor morphometry, pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function, or pad weight gain observed after a standardised running protocol are associated with the exposure of the pelvic floor to loading during the run.MethodsAdult female runners with (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 19) and without (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 19) running‐induced stress urinary incontinence (RI‐SUI) completed a 37‐min treadmill‐based running protocol with a pressure sensor placed in the posterior fornix of the vagina and a triaxial accelerometer adhered to the pelvis, and an incontinence pad adhered to their undergarment. Pelvic morphometry and PFM function were assessed before and after the run using transperineal ultrasonography and intra‐vaginal dynamometry. Urine leakage volume was estimated based on incontinence pad weight gain. Separate linear regression models were used to evaluate the associations between variables representative of pelvic floor load exposure (posterior fornix sensor pressure [PFSP] and pelvic accelerations) and changes in pelvic morphometry, PFM function, and incontinence pad weight observed after the run.ResultsAfter the run, the levator hiatus was larger and the bladder neck sat lower in the pelvis, but there were no significant differences in PFM active or passive forces measured using dynamometry. These changes were not different between those with and those without RI‐SUI. Higher pelvic accelerations were associated with greater reductions in passive PFM stiffness after the run (<jats:italic>R</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 20%–27%), but not with changes in pelvic morphometry. No associations were found between any measures of pelvic floor load exposure and changes in PFM force‐generating capacity. Among runners with RI‐SUI, greater pad weight gain occurred among those who ran with slower vector accelerations (<jats:italic>R</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 0.27).ConclusionThe magnitude of pelvic floor loading experienced during running does not appear to influence the transient loss in static pelvic organ support observed after running nor urine leakage volume.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJU International\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJU International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16842\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJU International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16842","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的研究在女性跑步者中,在标准化跑步方案后观察到的盆底形态测量、盆底肌肉(PFM)功能或垫重增加的短暂变化是否与跑步期间盆底暴露于负荷有关。方法:有(n = 19)和没有(n = 19)跑步引起的压力性尿失禁(RI - SUI)的成年女性跑步者完成了一项37分钟的跑步机跑步方案,其中压力传感器放置在阴道后孔,三轴加速度计粘附在骨盆上,尿失禁垫粘附在内衣上。盆腔形态测量和PFM功能在跑步前后通过经会阴超声检查和阴道内动力测量进行评估。漏尿量是根据尿失禁垫体重的增加来估计的。使用单独的线性回归模型来评估代表盆底负荷暴露的变量(后穹窿传感器压力[PFSP]和盆腔加速度)与跑步后观察到的盆腔形态测量、PFM功能和失禁垫重量的变化之间的关系。结果跑步后,提肛肌间隙增大,膀胱颈在骨盆内位置降低,但动力测量法测得的PFM主动力与被动力无显著差异。这些变化在RI - SUI患者和非RI - SUI患者之间没有差异。更高的盆腔加速度与跑步后被动PFM僵硬程度的降低相关(R2 = 20%-27%),但与盆腔形态测量的变化无关。盆底负荷暴露与PFM产生力能力的变化之间没有发现任何关联。在患有RI - SUI的跑步者中,在矢量加速度较慢的跑步者中,垫重增加较多(R2 = 0.27)。结论跑步时盆底负荷的大小不影响跑步后盆腔器官支持的短暂损失,也不影响尿漏量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is pelvic floor loading in female runners associated with post‐run changes in pelvic floor morphometry or function?
ObjectivesTo investigate whether, among female runners, transient changes in pelvic floor morphometry, pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function, or pad weight gain observed after a standardised running protocol are associated with the exposure of the pelvic floor to loading during the run.MethodsAdult female runners with (n = 19) and without (n = 19) running‐induced stress urinary incontinence (RI‐SUI) completed a 37‐min treadmill‐based running protocol with a pressure sensor placed in the posterior fornix of the vagina and a triaxial accelerometer adhered to the pelvis, and an incontinence pad adhered to their undergarment. Pelvic morphometry and PFM function were assessed before and after the run using transperineal ultrasonography and intra‐vaginal dynamometry. Urine leakage volume was estimated based on incontinence pad weight gain. Separate linear regression models were used to evaluate the associations between variables representative of pelvic floor load exposure (posterior fornix sensor pressure [PFSP] and pelvic accelerations) and changes in pelvic morphometry, PFM function, and incontinence pad weight observed after the run.ResultsAfter the run, the levator hiatus was larger and the bladder neck sat lower in the pelvis, but there were no significant differences in PFM active or passive forces measured using dynamometry. These changes were not different between those with and those without RI‐SUI. Higher pelvic accelerations were associated with greater reductions in passive PFM stiffness after the run (R2 = 20%–27%), but not with changes in pelvic morphometry. No associations were found between any measures of pelvic floor load exposure and changes in PFM force‐generating capacity. Among runners with RI‐SUI, greater pad weight gain occurred among those who ran with slower vector accelerations (R2 = 0.27).ConclusionThe magnitude of pelvic floor loading experienced during running does not appear to influence the transient loss in static pelvic organ support observed after running nor urine leakage volume.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJU International
BJU International 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
262
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BJUI is one of the most highly respected medical journals in the world, with a truly international range of published papers and appeal. Every issue gives invaluable practical information in the form of original articles, reviews, comments, surgical education articles, and translational science articles in the field of urology. BJUI employs topical sections, and is in full colour, making it easier to browse or search for something specific.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信