{"title":"修正“中国肛周失禁妇女围产期悲伤量表的验证与改进:一项心理测量学研究”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cpp.70119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>\n <span>Li, S. N.</span>, <span>Yang, L.</span>, <span>Wang, Q. Y.</span>, <span>Xie, J.</span>, <span>Cao, H.</span>, <span>Zhao, W.</span>, & <span>Tang, S. Q.</span> (<span>2025</span>). <span>Validation and Refinement of the Short Version of Perinatal Grief Scale in Chinese Women Who Experience Perianal Loss: A Psychometric Study</span>. <i>Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy</i>, <span>32</span>(<span>2</span>), e70067. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.70067.\n </p><p>In title, the ‘Validation and Refinement of the Short Version of Perinatal Grief Scale in Chinese Women Who Experience Perianal Loss: A Psychometric Study’ was incorrect. This should have read: ‘Validation and Refinement of the Short Version of Perinatal Grief Scale in Chinese Women Who Experience Perinatal Loss: A Psychometric Study’.</p><p>In page 6 of the ‘Results’ section, the title ‘3.2 Internal Consistency and Stability of the 6-PAQ-C’ was incorrect. This should have read: ‘Internal Consistency and Stability’.</p><p>In page 6 of the ‘Results’ section, the text ‘For stability, the kappa value of the 8-week test–retest reliability of the refined SVPGS was 0.83 (range 0.80 [domain: difficulty coping] to 0.88 [domain: active grief])’ was incorrect. This should have read: ‘For stability, the kappa value of the 1-month test–retest reliability of the refined SVPGS was 0.83 (range 0.80 [domain: difficulty coping] to 0.88 [domain: active grief])’.</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"32 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.70119","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correction to ‘Validation and Refinement of the Short Version of Perinatal Grief Scale in Chinese Women Who Experience Perianal Loss: A Psychometric Study’\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpp.70119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>\\n <span>Li, S. N.</span>, <span>Yang, L.</span>, <span>Wang, Q. Y.</span>, <span>Xie, J.</span>, <span>Cao, H.</span>, <span>Zhao, W.</span>, & <span>Tang, S. Q.</span> (<span>2025</span>). <span>Validation and Refinement of the Short Version of Perinatal Grief Scale in Chinese Women Who Experience Perianal Loss: A Psychometric Study</span>. <i>Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy</i>, <span>32</span>(<span>2</span>), e70067. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.70067.\\n </p><p>In title, the ‘Validation and Refinement of the Short Version of Perinatal Grief Scale in Chinese Women Who Experience Perianal Loss: A Psychometric Study’ was incorrect. This should have read: ‘Validation and Refinement of the Short Version of Perinatal Grief Scale in Chinese Women Who Experience Perinatal Loss: A Psychometric Study’.</p><p>In page 6 of the ‘Results’ section, the title ‘3.2 Internal Consistency and Stability of the 6-PAQ-C’ was incorrect. This should have read: ‘Internal Consistency and Stability’.</p><p>In page 6 of the ‘Results’ section, the text ‘For stability, the kappa value of the 8-week test–retest reliability of the refined SVPGS was 0.83 (range 0.80 [domain: difficulty coping] to 0.88 [domain: active grief])’ was incorrect. This should have read: ‘For stability, the kappa value of the 1-month test–retest reliability of the refined SVPGS was 0.83 (range 0.80 [domain: difficulty coping] to 0.88 [domain: active grief])’.</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\"32 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.70119\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70119\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70119","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Correction to ‘Validation and Refinement of the Short Version of Perinatal Grief Scale in Chinese Women Who Experience Perianal Loss: A Psychometric Study’
Li, S. N., Yang, L., Wang, Q. Y., Xie, J., Cao, H., Zhao, W., & Tang, S. Q. (2025). Validation and Refinement of the Short Version of Perinatal Grief Scale in Chinese Women Who Experience Perianal Loss: A Psychometric Study. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 32(2), e70067. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.70067.
In title, the ‘Validation and Refinement of the Short Version of Perinatal Grief Scale in Chinese Women Who Experience Perianal Loss: A Psychometric Study’ was incorrect. This should have read: ‘Validation and Refinement of the Short Version of Perinatal Grief Scale in Chinese Women Who Experience Perinatal Loss: A Psychometric Study’.
In page 6 of the ‘Results’ section, the title ‘3.2 Internal Consistency and Stability of the 6-PAQ-C’ was incorrect. This should have read: ‘Internal Consistency and Stability’.
In page 6 of the ‘Results’ section, the text ‘For stability, the kappa value of the 8-week test–retest reliability of the refined SVPGS was 0.83 (range 0.80 [domain: difficulty coping] to 0.88 [domain: active grief])’ was incorrect. This should have read: ‘For stability, the kappa value of the 1-month test–retest reliability of the refined SVPGS was 0.83 (range 0.80 [domain: difficulty coping] to 0.88 [domain: active grief])’.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.