Iftikhar Ali Ch, Khurram Nasir, Uzair Majeed, Azhar Chaudhry, Muhammad Abdullah, Ali Haider, Asadullah Jamal, Anum Hussain, Hammad Iftikhar, Salman Khalid, Pei-Tzu Wu, Yusuf Shah, Arham Niaz, Muhammad Siddique, Naeem Tahirkheli
{"title":"他汀类药物强度对冠状动脉搭桥术后心血管结局和生存的影响","authors":"Iftikhar Ali Ch, Khurram Nasir, Uzair Majeed, Azhar Chaudhry, Muhammad Abdullah, Ali Haider, Asadullah Jamal, Anum Hussain, Hammad Iftikhar, Salman Khalid, Pei-Tzu Wu, Yusuf Shah, Arham Niaz, Muhammad Siddique, Naeem Tahirkheli","doi":"10.1002/clc.70170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>High-intensity statins are recommended for patients with chronic coronary artery disease, with reports suggesting improved clinical outcomes. However, recent findings in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients question whether a treat-to-target low density lipoprotein (LDL) approach is non-inferior to high-intensity statin therapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This single-center observational study analyzed all CABG only (<i>n</i> = 1854) procedures performed between 2013 and 2015. Patients were divided into three groups based on statin prescription: high-intensity statin therapy (atorvastatin ≥ 40 mg or rosuvastatin ≥ 20 mg), low/moderate-intensity statin therapy, and a no-statin group. The primary outcome measured was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of post-CABG acute coronary syndrome, cerebrovascular accident and cardiovascular mortality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>No-Statin group had significantly higher incidence of MACE compared to statin group (14.2% vs 8.9%; odds ratio (OR) 1.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.055–2.427, <i>p</i> = 0.029). Low/moderate-intensity therapy (<i>n</i> = 1301) was associated with a numerically higher overall rate of MACE compared to high-intensity therapy (<i>n</i> = 397) but was not statistically significant (9.6% vs 6.6%; OR 1.45, CI 0.961–2.172, <i>p</i> = 0.073). Beyond 2 years post-CABG, low/moderate intensity statin use was associated with a significant higher incidence of MACE (9.1% vs 5.3%; OR 1.72, 95% CI 0.993–2.978, <i>p</i> = 0.047) compared to high intensity statins.</p>\n \n <p>Patients who received high-intensity statin therapy had the lowest LDL levels (82.21 ± 41.85 mg/dL), compared to those on low/moderate-intensity statins (90.84 ± 45.89 mg/dL) and no-statin group (104.83 ± 38.93 mg/dL, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>High-intensity statin therapy following CABG is associated with improved long-term clinical outcomes compared to low- or moderate-intensity statin regimens.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"48 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clc.70170","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Statin Intensity on Cardiovascular Outcomes and Survival Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting\",\"authors\":\"Iftikhar Ali Ch, Khurram Nasir, Uzair Majeed, Azhar Chaudhry, Muhammad Abdullah, Ali Haider, Asadullah Jamal, Anum Hussain, Hammad Iftikhar, Salman Khalid, Pei-Tzu Wu, Yusuf Shah, Arham Niaz, Muhammad Siddique, Naeem Tahirkheli\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/clc.70170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>High-intensity statins are recommended for patients with chronic coronary artery disease, with reports suggesting improved clinical outcomes. However, recent findings in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients question whether a treat-to-target low density lipoprotein (LDL) approach is non-inferior to high-intensity statin therapy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This single-center observational study analyzed all CABG only (<i>n</i> = 1854) procedures performed between 2013 and 2015. Patients were divided into three groups based on statin prescription: high-intensity statin therapy (atorvastatin ≥ 40 mg or rosuvastatin ≥ 20 mg), low/moderate-intensity statin therapy, and a no-statin group. The primary outcome measured was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of post-CABG acute coronary syndrome, cerebrovascular accident and cardiovascular mortality.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>No-Statin group had significantly higher incidence of MACE compared to statin group (14.2% vs 8.9%; odds ratio (OR) 1.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.055–2.427, <i>p</i> = 0.029). Low/moderate-intensity therapy (<i>n</i> = 1301) was associated with a numerically higher overall rate of MACE compared to high-intensity therapy (<i>n</i> = 397) but was not statistically significant (9.6% vs 6.6%; OR 1.45, CI 0.961–2.172, <i>p</i> = 0.073). Beyond 2 years post-CABG, low/moderate intensity statin use was associated with a significant higher incidence of MACE (9.1% vs 5.3%; OR 1.72, 95% CI 0.993–2.978, <i>p</i> = 0.047) compared to high intensity statins.</p>\\n \\n <p>Patients who received high-intensity statin therapy had the lowest LDL levels (82.21 ± 41.85 mg/dL), compared to those on low/moderate-intensity statins (90.84 ± 45.89 mg/dL) and no-statin group (104.83 ± 38.93 mg/dL, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>High-intensity statin therapy following CABG is associated with improved long-term clinical outcomes compared to low- or moderate-intensity statin regimens.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"48 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clc.70170\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.70170\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.70170","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:高强度他汀类药物推荐用于慢性冠状动脉疾病患者,有报告表明其可改善临床结果。然而,最近在冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者中的研究结果质疑靶向低密度脂蛋白(LDL)治疗方法是否优于高强度他汀类药物治疗。方法:本研究为单中心观察性研究,分析2013年至2015年间进行的所有CABG手术(n = 1854)。患者根据他汀类药物处方分为三组:高强度他汀治疗(阿托伐他汀≥40mg或瑞舒伐他汀≥20mg),低/中强度他汀治疗和无他汀治疗组。测量的主要终点是主要不良心血管事件(MACE),即冠脉搭桥后急性冠状动脉综合征、脑血管意外和心血管死亡率的综合指标。结果无他汀类药物组MACE发生率显著高于他汀类药物组(14.2% vs 8.9%;优势比(OR) 1.60, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.055-2.427, p = 0.029)。与高强度治疗(n = 397)相比,低/中强度治疗(n = 1301)与数字上更高的MACE总体发生率相关,但无统计学意义(9.6% vs 6.6%;OR 1.45, CI 0.961-2.172, p = 0.073)。冠脉搭桥后2年以上,低/中强度他汀类药物使用与MACE发生率显著升高相关(9.1% vs 5.3%;OR 1.72, 95% CI 0.993-2.978, p = 0.047)。接受高强度他汀类药物治疗的患者LDL水平最低(82.21±41.85 mg/dL),而接受低/中强度他汀类药物治疗的患者(90.84±45.89 mg/dL)和不接受他汀类药物治疗的患者(104.83±38.93 mg/dL, p < 0.001)。结论:与低或中等强度他汀类药物治疗方案相比,CABG术后高强度他汀类药物治疗可改善长期临床结果。
Effect of Statin Intensity on Cardiovascular Outcomes and Survival Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Background
High-intensity statins are recommended for patients with chronic coronary artery disease, with reports suggesting improved clinical outcomes. However, recent findings in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients question whether a treat-to-target low density lipoprotein (LDL) approach is non-inferior to high-intensity statin therapy.
Methods
This single-center observational study analyzed all CABG only (n = 1854) procedures performed between 2013 and 2015. Patients were divided into three groups based on statin prescription: high-intensity statin therapy (atorvastatin ≥ 40 mg or rosuvastatin ≥ 20 mg), low/moderate-intensity statin therapy, and a no-statin group. The primary outcome measured was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of post-CABG acute coronary syndrome, cerebrovascular accident and cardiovascular mortality.
Results
No-Statin group had significantly higher incidence of MACE compared to statin group (14.2% vs 8.9%; odds ratio (OR) 1.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.055–2.427, p = 0.029). Low/moderate-intensity therapy (n = 1301) was associated with a numerically higher overall rate of MACE compared to high-intensity therapy (n = 397) but was not statistically significant (9.6% vs 6.6%; OR 1.45, CI 0.961–2.172, p = 0.073). Beyond 2 years post-CABG, low/moderate intensity statin use was associated with a significant higher incidence of MACE (9.1% vs 5.3%; OR 1.72, 95% CI 0.993–2.978, p = 0.047) compared to high intensity statins.
Patients who received high-intensity statin therapy had the lowest LDL levels (82.21 ± 41.85 mg/dL), compared to those on low/moderate-intensity statins (90.84 ± 45.89 mg/dL) and no-statin group (104.83 ± 38.93 mg/dL, p < 0.001).
Conclusion
High-intensity statin therapy following CABG is associated with improved long-term clinical outcomes compared to low- or moderate-intensity statin regimens.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Cardiology provides a fully Gold Open Access forum for the publication of original clinical research, as well as brief reviews of diagnostic and therapeutic issues in cardiovascular medicine and cardiovascular surgery.
The journal includes Clinical Investigations, Reviews, free standing editorials and commentaries, and bonus online-only content.
The journal also publishes supplements, Expert Panel Discussions, sponsored clinical Reviews, Trial Designs, and Quality and Outcomes.