他汀类药物强度对冠状动脉搭桥术后心血管结局和生存的影响

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Iftikhar Ali Ch, Khurram Nasir, Uzair Majeed, Azhar Chaudhry, Muhammad Abdullah, Ali Haider, Asadullah Jamal, Anum Hussain, Hammad Iftikhar, Salman Khalid, Pei-Tzu Wu, Yusuf Shah, Arham Niaz, Muhammad Siddique, Naeem Tahirkheli
{"title":"他汀类药物强度对冠状动脉搭桥术后心血管结局和生存的影响","authors":"Iftikhar Ali Ch,&nbsp;Khurram Nasir,&nbsp;Uzair Majeed,&nbsp;Azhar Chaudhry,&nbsp;Muhammad Abdullah,&nbsp;Ali Haider,&nbsp;Asadullah Jamal,&nbsp;Anum Hussain,&nbsp;Hammad Iftikhar,&nbsp;Salman Khalid,&nbsp;Pei-Tzu Wu,&nbsp;Yusuf Shah,&nbsp;Arham Niaz,&nbsp;Muhammad Siddique,&nbsp;Naeem Tahirkheli","doi":"10.1002/clc.70170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>High-intensity statins are recommended for patients with chronic coronary artery disease, with reports suggesting improved clinical outcomes. However, recent findings in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients question whether a treat-to-target low density lipoprotein (LDL) approach is non-inferior to high-intensity statin therapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This single-center observational study analyzed all CABG only (<i>n</i> = 1854) procedures performed between 2013 and 2015. Patients were divided into three groups based on statin prescription: high-intensity statin therapy (atorvastatin ≥ 40 mg or rosuvastatin ≥ 20 mg), low/moderate-intensity statin therapy, and a no-statin group. The primary outcome measured was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of post-CABG acute coronary syndrome, cerebrovascular accident and cardiovascular mortality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>No-Statin group had significantly higher incidence of MACE compared to statin group (14.2% vs 8.9%; odds ratio (OR) 1.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.055–2.427, <i>p</i> = 0.029). Low/moderate-intensity therapy (<i>n</i> = 1301) was associated with a numerically higher overall rate of MACE compared to high-intensity therapy (<i>n</i> = 397) but was not statistically significant (9.6% vs 6.6%; OR 1.45, CI 0.961–2.172, <i>p</i> = 0.073). Beyond 2 years post-CABG, low/moderate intensity statin use was associated with a significant higher incidence of MACE (9.1% vs 5.3%; OR 1.72, 95% CI 0.993–2.978, <i>p</i> = 0.047) compared to high intensity statins.</p>\n \n <p>Patients who received high-intensity statin therapy had the lowest LDL levels (82.21 ± 41.85 mg/dL), compared to those on low/moderate-intensity statins (90.84 ± 45.89 mg/dL) and no-statin group (104.83 ± 38.93 mg/dL, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>High-intensity statin therapy following CABG is associated with improved long-term clinical outcomes compared to low- or moderate-intensity statin regimens.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"48 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clc.70170","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Statin Intensity on Cardiovascular Outcomes and Survival Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting\",\"authors\":\"Iftikhar Ali Ch,&nbsp;Khurram Nasir,&nbsp;Uzair Majeed,&nbsp;Azhar Chaudhry,&nbsp;Muhammad Abdullah,&nbsp;Ali Haider,&nbsp;Asadullah Jamal,&nbsp;Anum Hussain,&nbsp;Hammad Iftikhar,&nbsp;Salman Khalid,&nbsp;Pei-Tzu Wu,&nbsp;Yusuf Shah,&nbsp;Arham Niaz,&nbsp;Muhammad Siddique,&nbsp;Naeem Tahirkheli\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/clc.70170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>High-intensity statins are recommended for patients with chronic coronary artery disease, with reports suggesting improved clinical outcomes. However, recent findings in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients question whether a treat-to-target low density lipoprotein (LDL) approach is non-inferior to high-intensity statin therapy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This single-center observational study analyzed all CABG only (<i>n</i> = 1854) procedures performed between 2013 and 2015. Patients were divided into three groups based on statin prescription: high-intensity statin therapy (atorvastatin ≥ 40 mg or rosuvastatin ≥ 20 mg), low/moderate-intensity statin therapy, and a no-statin group. The primary outcome measured was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of post-CABG acute coronary syndrome, cerebrovascular accident and cardiovascular mortality.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>No-Statin group had significantly higher incidence of MACE compared to statin group (14.2% vs 8.9%; odds ratio (OR) 1.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.055–2.427, <i>p</i> = 0.029). Low/moderate-intensity therapy (<i>n</i> = 1301) was associated with a numerically higher overall rate of MACE compared to high-intensity therapy (<i>n</i> = 397) but was not statistically significant (9.6% vs 6.6%; OR 1.45, CI 0.961–2.172, <i>p</i> = 0.073). Beyond 2 years post-CABG, low/moderate intensity statin use was associated with a significant higher incidence of MACE (9.1% vs 5.3%; OR 1.72, 95% CI 0.993–2.978, <i>p</i> = 0.047) compared to high intensity statins.</p>\\n \\n <p>Patients who received high-intensity statin therapy had the lowest LDL levels (82.21 ± 41.85 mg/dL), compared to those on low/moderate-intensity statins (90.84 ± 45.89 mg/dL) and no-statin group (104.83 ± 38.93 mg/dL, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>High-intensity statin therapy following CABG is associated with improved long-term clinical outcomes compared to low- or moderate-intensity statin regimens.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"48 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clc.70170\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.70170\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.70170","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:高强度他汀类药物推荐用于慢性冠状动脉疾病患者,有报告表明其可改善临床结果。然而,最近在冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者中的研究结果质疑靶向低密度脂蛋白(LDL)治疗方法是否优于高强度他汀类药物治疗。方法:本研究为单中心观察性研究,分析2013年至2015年间进行的所有CABG手术(n = 1854)。患者根据他汀类药物处方分为三组:高强度他汀治疗(阿托伐他汀≥40mg或瑞舒伐他汀≥20mg),低/中强度他汀治疗和无他汀治疗组。测量的主要终点是主要不良心血管事件(MACE),即冠脉搭桥后急性冠状动脉综合征、脑血管意外和心血管死亡率的综合指标。结果无他汀类药物组MACE发生率显著高于他汀类药物组(14.2% vs 8.9%;优势比(OR) 1.60, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.055-2.427, p = 0.029)。与高强度治疗(n = 397)相比,低/中强度治疗(n = 1301)与数字上更高的MACE总体发生率相关,但无统计学意义(9.6% vs 6.6%;OR 1.45, CI 0.961-2.172, p = 0.073)。冠脉搭桥后2年以上,低/中强度他汀类药物使用与MACE发生率显著升高相关(9.1% vs 5.3%;OR 1.72, 95% CI 0.993-2.978, p = 0.047)。接受高强度他汀类药物治疗的患者LDL水平最低(82.21±41.85 mg/dL),而接受低/中强度他汀类药物治疗的患者(90.84±45.89 mg/dL)和不接受他汀类药物治疗的患者(104.83±38.93 mg/dL, p < 0.001)。结论:与低或中等强度他汀类药物治疗方案相比,CABG术后高强度他汀类药物治疗可改善长期临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effect of Statin Intensity on Cardiovascular Outcomes and Survival Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Effect of Statin Intensity on Cardiovascular Outcomes and Survival Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Background

High-intensity statins are recommended for patients with chronic coronary artery disease, with reports suggesting improved clinical outcomes. However, recent findings in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients question whether a treat-to-target low density lipoprotein (LDL) approach is non-inferior to high-intensity statin therapy.

Methods

This single-center observational study analyzed all CABG only (n = 1854) procedures performed between 2013 and 2015. Patients were divided into three groups based on statin prescription: high-intensity statin therapy (atorvastatin ≥ 40 mg or rosuvastatin ≥ 20 mg), low/moderate-intensity statin therapy, and a no-statin group. The primary outcome measured was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of post-CABG acute coronary syndrome, cerebrovascular accident and cardiovascular mortality.

Results

No-Statin group had significantly higher incidence of MACE compared to statin group (14.2% vs 8.9%; odds ratio (OR) 1.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.055–2.427, p = 0.029). Low/moderate-intensity therapy (n = 1301) was associated with a numerically higher overall rate of MACE compared to high-intensity therapy (n = 397) but was not statistically significant (9.6% vs 6.6%; OR 1.45, CI 0.961–2.172, p = 0.073). Beyond 2 years post-CABG, low/moderate intensity statin use was associated with a significant higher incidence of MACE (9.1% vs 5.3%; OR 1.72, 95% CI 0.993–2.978, p = 0.047) compared to high intensity statins.

Patients who received high-intensity statin therapy had the lowest LDL levels (82.21 ± 41.85 mg/dL), compared to those on low/moderate-intensity statins (90.84 ± 45.89 mg/dL) and no-statin group (104.83 ± 38.93 mg/dL, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

High-intensity statin therapy following CABG is associated with improved long-term clinical outcomes compared to low- or moderate-intensity statin regimens.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Cardiology
Clinical Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
189
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Cardiology provides a fully Gold Open Access forum for the publication of original clinical research, as well as brief reviews of diagnostic and therapeutic issues in cardiovascular medicine and cardiovascular surgery. The journal includes Clinical Investigations, Reviews, free standing editorials and commentaries, and bonus online-only content. The journal also publishes supplements, Expert Panel Discussions, sponsored clinical Reviews, Trial Designs, and Quality and Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信