用Argo的绝对地转流模型评价挪威海封闭盆地的涡旋和风力驱动环流

IF 3.3 2区 地球科学 Q1 OCEANOGRAPHY
T. M. Shaun Johnston, Anna Lina P. Sjur, Pål Erik Isachsen, J. H. LaCasce
{"title":"用Argo的绝对地转流模型评价挪威海封闭盆地的涡旋和风力驱动环流","authors":"T. M. Shaun Johnston,&nbsp;Anna Lina P. Sjur,&nbsp;Pål Erik Isachsen,&nbsp;J. H. LaCasce","doi":"10.1029/2024JC021990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cyclonic flow in enclosed basins arises from cyclonic vorticity input from either winds or eddies. Previous observations show winds account for about half of the circulation (integral of parallel velocity around a closed isobath) in the Lofoten Basin of the Norwegian Sea, implying a comparable contribution from eddies. In contrast, in the Norwegian Basin, winds explain much of the circulation. We use Argo data from 2012 to 2022, a linear wind-forced and bottom friction-regulated model, and a primitive equation model to investigate how winds and eddies drive the circulation. While Argo cannot resolve individual eddies, it does resolve mesoscale spatial variability. Absolute geostrophic velocities to 2,000 m are calculated by referencing geostrophic shear from objective maps of the profile data to the trajectories at 1,000 m. The time-mean shear is anticyclonic. However, the flow is mostly cyclonic, bottom-intensified, and isobath following. The linear model explains less than half of the observed circulation, suggesting a contribution from an unobserved eddy flux. This interpretation is supported by a numerical model with 800-m horizontal resolution, which resolves the 10–15-km deformation radius. In this model, the difference between the full and linear response comes from an eddy-driven vorticity flux, which produces a largely cyclonic circulation. This result is consistent with the observed global prevalence of positive topostrophy (anticyclonic flow around elevations and cyclonic flow around basins). The observations also show a seasonal shift in the eddy flux, which maybe related to a decadal-scale fresh inflow that alters the density gradient and influences eddy production.</p>","PeriodicalId":54340,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans","volume":"130 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eddy- and Wind-Driven Circulation in the Enclosed Basins of the Norwegian Sea Evaluated Using a Model and Absolute Geostrophic Flow From Argo\",\"authors\":\"T. M. Shaun Johnston,&nbsp;Anna Lina P. Sjur,&nbsp;Pål Erik Isachsen,&nbsp;J. H. LaCasce\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JC021990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Cyclonic flow in enclosed basins arises from cyclonic vorticity input from either winds or eddies. Previous observations show winds account for about half of the circulation (integral of parallel velocity around a closed isobath) in the Lofoten Basin of the Norwegian Sea, implying a comparable contribution from eddies. In contrast, in the Norwegian Basin, winds explain much of the circulation. We use Argo data from 2012 to 2022, a linear wind-forced and bottom friction-regulated model, and a primitive equation model to investigate how winds and eddies drive the circulation. While Argo cannot resolve individual eddies, it does resolve mesoscale spatial variability. Absolute geostrophic velocities to 2,000 m are calculated by referencing geostrophic shear from objective maps of the profile data to the trajectories at 1,000 m. The time-mean shear is anticyclonic. However, the flow is mostly cyclonic, bottom-intensified, and isobath following. The linear model explains less than half of the observed circulation, suggesting a contribution from an unobserved eddy flux. This interpretation is supported by a numerical model with 800-m horizontal resolution, which resolves the 10–15-km deformation radius. In this model, the difference between the full and linear response comes from an eddy-driven vorticity flux, which produces a largely cyclonic circulation. This result is consistent with the observed global prevalence of positive topostrophy (anticyclonic flow around elevations and cyclonic flow around basins). The observations also show a seasonal shift in the eddy flux, which maybe related to a decadal-scale fresh inflow that alters the density gradient and influences eddy production.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans\",\"volume\":\"130 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JC021990\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OCEANOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JC021990","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

封闭盆地中的气旋流是由风或漩涡输入的气旋涡量引起的。先前的观测表明,在挪威海的罗弗敦盆地,风大约占环流的一半(沿闭合等深线平行速度的积分),这意味着涡流也有相当的贡献。相反,在挪威盆地,风解释了大部分的环流。我们使用2012年至2022年的Argo数据,一个线性风强迫和底部摩擦调节模型,以及一个原始方程模型来研究风和涡流是如何驱动环流的。虽然Argo不能解决个别漩涡,但它确实解决了中尺度空间变异性。通过参考地转切变从剖面数据的客观图到1,000 m的轨迹来计算2,000 m的绝对地转速度。时间平均切变是反气旋的。然而,气流主要是气旋式的,底部增强,等深线跟随。线性模式解释了观测到的环流的不到一半,表明未观测到的涡流通量有贡献。这一解释得到了一个水平分辨率为800 m的数值模型的支持,该模型可以解析10 - 15 km的变形半径。在这个模型中,完全响应和线性响应之间的差异来自于涡流驱动的涡量通量,它产生了一个很大程度上的气旋环流。这一结果与观测到的全球正地形(高地周围的反气旋流和盆地周围的气旋流)的普遍存在相一致。观测还显示涡旋通量的季节变化,这可能与年代际新鲜流入改变密度梯度并影响涡旋产生有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Eddy- and Wind-Driven Circulation in the Enclosed Basins of the Norwegian Sea Evaluated Using a Model and Absolute Geostrophic Flow From Argo

Cyclonic flow in enclosed basins arises from cyclonic vorticity input from either winds or eddies. Previous observations show winds account for about half of the circulation (integral of parallel velocity around a closed isobath) in the Lofoten Basin of the Norwegian Sea, implying a comparable contribution from eddies. In contrast, in the Norwegian Basin, winds explain much of the circulation. We use Argo data from 2012 to 2022, a linear wind-forced and bottom friction-regulated model, and a primitive equation model to investigate how winds and eddies drive the circulation. While Argo cannot resolve individual eddies, it does resolve mesoscale spatial variability. Absolute geostrophic velocities to 2,000 m are calculated by referencing geostrophic shear from objective maps of the profile data to the trajectories at 1,000 m. The time-mean shear is anticyclonic. However, the flow is mostly cyclonic, bottom-intensified, and isobath following. The linear model explains less than half of the observed circulation, suggesting a contribution from an unobserved eddy flux. This interpretation is supported by a numerical model with 800-m horizontal resolution, which resolves the 10–15-km deformation radius. In this model, the difference between the full and linear response comes from an eddy-driven vorticity flux, which produces a largely cyclonic circulation. This result is consistent with the observed global prevalence of positive topostrophy (anticyclonic flow around elevations and cyclonic flow around basins). The observations also show a seasonal shift in the eddy flux, which maybe related to a decadal-scale fresh inflow that alters the density gradient and influences eddy production.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans
Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans Earth and Planetary Sciences-Oceanography
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
429
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信